Науковий вісник НГУ

Social responsibility assessment in the field of employment (case study of manufacturing)

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 1

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Contens №3 2020

Last Updated on 13 September 2020

Published on 02 July 2020

Hits: 3675

Authors:

O. O. Oliinyk, Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Associate Professor of the Department of Human Resources and Entrepreneurship, orcid.org/0000-0002-3941-2286, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Rivne, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2020, (3): 131-136

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-3/131

повний текст / full article

Abstract:

Purpose. To develop methodological framework for the assessment of social responsibility in the field of remuneration and its informational support in manufacturing by types of economic activity.

Methodology. This paper draws on theoretical and methodological concerns of modern economics, research works by domestic and foreign scientists with regard to issues of social and employment sphere, social responsibility, and decent work. While investigating the issue, the authors used the following research methods: generalisation, systematisation, analysis and synthesis (to analyse theoretical and methodological advances regarding the assessment of social responsibility in employment relations); statistical analysis (to diagnose informational support of implementing social responsibility); aggregation (to assess social responsibility in the field of remuneration); comparative analysis (to diagnose the level of social responsibility in the field of remuneration in manufacturing by types of economic activity); expert assessments (to substantiate the weighting coefficients of partial indices).

Findings. The research generalised and systematised approaches of scientists in terms of determining the content of social responsibility in employment relations, as well as analysed existing methodological framework for the assessment of social responsibility and criteria of international standards in this field. Basing on the received data, the paper substantiated the indicators for the assessment of social responsibility in the field of remuneration with their distribution to incentives and disincentives. The authors developed an aggregate index to determine the level of social responsibility in the field of remuneration and tested its calculation with regard to manufacturing in Ukraine by types of economic activity.

Originality. The methodological framework of social responsibility assessment in the field of remuneration, which is based on the calculation of the aggregate index that uses incentives and disincentives, has been improved. Unlike the current practice, the methodological principles use the indicators that characterise the level of compliance with the requirements of legislation, as well as additional obligations, in terms of social responsibility concept.

Practical value. The developed and substantiated methodological principles allow assessing the effectiveness of remuneration regulation in various types of economic activity, as well as the level of material well-being of employees with sufficient objectivity. The use of the social responsibility index in the field of remuneration allows determining “bottlenecks” in social policy basing on obtained partial and aggregate indicators and defining priority directions of social and employment sphere development. It will also serve as a basis for improving the interaction of social partners and substantiating their requirements and suggestions when concluding collective employment agreements at different levels.

References.

1. Levchenko, O. V., & Moroz, T. V. (2017). Research of indicators of internal corporate social responsibility. Economy and society, 11, 263-269.

2. Libanova, E. M., Makarova, O. V., & Khmelevskaya, O. M. (2017). Human development in Ukraine: Institutional basis for social responsibility: monograph. Kyiv: Institute of Demography and Social Research named after M. V. Ptyhu NAS of Ukraine.

3. Antonyuk, V. P. (2016). Social policy in the sphere of remuneration: problems and ways to ensure its decent level (on the example of industry). Management of Economics: theory and practice, 3-24.

4. Amosha, O. I., & Shamileva, L. L. (2016). Development of labor potential of industry on the principles of social responsibility: conceptual and scientific and methodological support. Journal of Economic Sciences of Ukraine, 2, 3-8.

5. Bocharova, N. A., & Shchepilina, A. K. (2018). The integral assessment of the corporate social responsibility level of enterprise. Economy of the Transport Complex, 31, 45-62.

6. Hrishnova, O. A., Mishchuk, H. Yu., & Oliynyk, O. O. (2014). Social responsibility in labor relations: theory, practice, risk management: monograph. Rivne: National University of Water and Environmental Engineering.

7. Delini, M. M. (2017). Indicators of assessment of social and economic responsibility of entrepreneurship in Ukraine. Problems of economics, 4, 263-270.

8. Nagaevskaya, D. Yu. (2018). Methodical approach to ensuring social responsibility of business in the food market. Economics and society, 14, 725-734.

9. Pankova, O., & Kasperovych, O. (2018). Main directions and ways of modernization of the system of social and labor relations in industry on the basis of social responsibility and social dialogue. Ukraine: aspects of labor, 3, 36-43.

10. Zinchenko, A., & Saprykina, M. (2018). CSR Development in Ukraine: 2010–2018. Retrieved from http://csr-ua.info/csr-ukraine/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CSR_2017_reserch-1.pdf.

11. Smachylo, V. V., & Baliaba, V. O. (2015). Assessment of social responsibility by construction enterprises. Economics: the realities of time, 6(22), 162-169.

12. Social Accountability Certification (SA 8000) (2007). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/n0015697-07.

13. G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (2018). Retrieved from https://www2.globalreporting.org/standards/g4/Pages/default.aspx.

14. Mishchuk, G. Y., & Samolyuk, N. M. (2018). Measuring social justice in the context of evaluating the effectiveness of distribution relations in society. Demography and the social economics, 1, 58-72. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2018.01.

15. Labor of Ukraine 2018 (2019). Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.

16. Labor of Ukraine 2017 (2018). Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.

17. Labor of Ukraine 2016 (2017). Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.

• < Prev
• Next >