Науковий вісник НГУ

Governance models in the globalization era: from moral to political responsibility

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 4

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Contens №3 2020

Last Updated on 13 September 2020

Published on 02 July 2020

Hits: 4089

Authors:

V. Filipchuk, Cand. Sc. (Publ. Admin.), Associate Professor of the Political Sciences Department of the Faculty of Philosophy, orcid.org/0000-0002-7335-2256, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

G. Malkina, Dr. Sc. (Polit.), Assoc. Prof., Professor of the Political Sciences Department of the Faculty of Philosophy, orcid.org/0000-0002-2307-4702, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

V. Kolyukh, Dr. Sc. (Polit.), Assoc. Prof., Professor of the Political Sciences Department of the Faculty of Philosophy, orcid.org/0000-0002-8545-7450, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

I. Petrenko, Dr. Sc. (Polit.), Assoc. Prof., Associate Professor of the Political Sciences Department of the Faculty of Philosophy, orcid.org/0000-0003-3328-4102, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2020, (3): 177-182

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-3/177

повний текст / full article

Abstract:

Purpose. To study the role and significance of the moral responsibility of international management in governance models under conditions of global economy and democracy.

Methodology. The authors use structural-functional, institutional, and comparative methods as well as the methods of synthesis and analysis.

Findings. The authors examined and proved the key statement of the study. Modern international management is a holistic corporate governance culture. The foundations of leadership and professional qualities of modern international management are their moral qualities. In democratic governance models, the moral qualities of management turn into political responsibility and ensure the quality of management, the growth of state capacity of Ukraine, the formation and promotion of national interests in the face of global threats and challenges.

Originality. The authors prove that the main determining actor in the governance model is international management characterized by stable moral qualities. Only in this case, a governance model will achieve the highest efficiency and ensure the growth of state capacity, as well as the promotion of national interests in the face of global threats and challenges.

Practical value. The results of the study can be used to improve the legislative framework as well as to develop the educational programs for international management education. The experience of international management education under consideration, as well as the use of moral responsibility in the behaviour patterns of international management, will ensure the quality of governance, the growth of Ukrainian state capacity and the promotion of national interests in the global economy and democracy.

References.

1. Lane, H., & Maznevski, M. (2019). International Management Behavior: Global and Sustainable Leadership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108637152.

2. Rudenko, S., Bazaluk, O., Tsvykh, V., & Kalmuk, I. (2019). The Role of Philosophical Disciplines in Educational Strategies for Specialist Training in the Field of Public Administration. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (3), 158-163. https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2019-3/22.

3. Scholte, J. A. (2020). After Liberal Global Democracy: New Methodology for New Praxis. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, (13), 67-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-019-00265-3.

4. Prato, S., & Sonkin, F. (2018). Editorial: Inequalities, Financialization, Technology: Sometimes the Nearest Exit is Behind You. Development, 61, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-019-00222-3.

5. FACTS. Income Inequality in the United States (2020). Retrieved from https://inequality.org/facts/income-inequality/.

6. Kyianytsia, L. (2019). The One Belt One Road Initiative as a New Silk Road: The (Potential) Place of Ukraine. Ukrainian Policymaker, 4, 21-26. https://doi.org/10.29202/up/4/3.

7. Vilkov, V. (2018). “Scientific Communism” and the Modern Political Science in Ukraine. Ukrainian Policymaker, 2, 48-55. https://doi.org/10.29202/up/2/7.

8. Association Agreement between Ukraine, of the one part, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the other part (2015). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_011.

9. Kuyper, J. (2016). Global Democracy. In N. Zalta Edward (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/global-democracy/.

10. Fuchs, T. A. E. (2018). The Limits of European Integration Theories: Cyber-Development and the Future of the European Union. In E. Carayannis, D. Campbell, & M. Efthymiopoulos (Eds.), Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09069-6_62.

11. Soroka, L., & Kurkova, K. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Space Technologies: Legal, Ethical and Technological Issues. Advanced Space Law, 3, 131-139. https://doi.org/10.29202/asl/2019/3/11.

12. Yuldashev, S. (2018). The Concept of Overcoming Corruption in the Management of the Space Industry in Ukraine. Advanced Space Law, 2, 112-117. https://doi.org/10.29202/asl/2018/2/12.

13. Wu, G. (2017). Globalization against Democracy: A Political Economy of Capitalism after its Global Triumph. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108116077.

14. Zaring, D. (2019). The Globalized Governance of Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

15. Blau, A. (2018). Cognitive corruption and deliberative democracy. Social Philosophy and Policy, 35(2), 198-220. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052519000037.

16. Scholte, J. (Ed.) (2012). Building Global Democracy?: Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

17. Little, A., & Macdonald, K. (2013). Pathways to global democracy? Escaping the statist imaginary. Review of International Studies, 39(4), 789-813. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210512000551.

18. Bazaluk, O. (2019). Plato’s Traditions in Modern Educational Theories. Annals of the University of Craiova – Philosophy Series, 43(1/2019), 5-20.

19. Boettke, P. J., & Candela, R. A. (2020). Productive specialization, peaceful cooperation and the problem of the predatory state: lessons from comparative historical political economy. Public Choice, 182, 331-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00657-9.

20. Beardsworth, R. (2015). From Moral to Political Responsibility in a Globalized Age. Ethics & International Affairs, 29(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679414000781.

• < Prev
• Next >