Науковий вісник НГУ

Generic and professional managerial skills: changing nature, thinking and roles

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Contens №3 2020

Last Updated on 13 September 2020

Published on 02 July 2020

Hits: 3510

Authors:

V. Bilohur, Dr. Sc. (Phil.), Prof., Head of the Department of Theories and Methods of Physical Education and Sports Disciplines, orcid.org/0000-0001-9041-7050, Melitopol State Pedagogical University named after Bohdan Khmelnytsky, Melitopol, Ukraine

O. Kravchenko, Cand. Sc. (Phil.), Assoc. Prof., Associate Professor of the Philosophy Department, orcid.org/0000-0002-8736-8128, Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University, Pereiaslav, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

T. Lishchuk-Torchynska, Cand. Sc. (Phil.), Assoc. Prof., orcid.org/0000-0002-0118-5321, Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University, Lutsk, Ukraine

N. Yukhymenko, Cand. Sc. (Phil.), Assoc. Prof., Associate Professor of the Philosophy Department of the Sociohistorical Faculty, orcid.org/0000-0001-7739-9716, Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University, Pereiaslav, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2020, (3): 151-156

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-3/151

повний текст / full article

Abstract:

Purpose. To study changes in the nature, thinking and roles of generic and professional skills in various organizational cultures.

Methodology. In the study, the authors used the method of comparative analysis, which allowed us to contrast and compare existing organizational cultures. The methods of analysis and synthesis were used, which made it possible to identify and consider the use of managerial skills in each of the organizational culture. Methods of induction and deduction, as well as mental modeling, made it possible to establish changes in the nature of skills, way of thinking and the roles of generic and professional skills in various organizational cultures.

Findings. The authors examined the nature, thinking and roles of generic and professional managerial skills in Weberian bureaucracy, Mintzberg’s adhocracy, and self-managing organizations. It is proved that in order to achieve the agreement in interpreting the nature of generic and professional skills, it is necessary to change the idea of a university as a public institution. At least, the idea of self-organizing universities has to be accepted.

Originality. It is proved that the embodiment of the idea of self-organizing universities is a prerequisite for the creation of autonomous organizations, whose self-realization efficiency is recognized as the most effective in comparison with Weberian bureaucracy and Mintzberg’s adhocracy.

Practical value. The results of the study expand the understanding of the nature, thinking and roles of generic and professional managerial skills in various organizational cultures. The study demonstrates the efficiency of self-organizing universities and their significance in revealing the nature of man, in particular, the nature of managerial skills.

References.

1. Martela, F. (2019). What makes self-managing organizations novel? Comparing how Weberian bureaucracy, Mintzberg’s adhocracy, and self-organizing solve six fundamental problems of organizing. Journal of Organization Design, 8(23). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-019-0062-9.

2. Glynn Cochrane (2018). Max Weber's Vision for Bureaucracy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62289-7.

3. Lishchuk-Torchynska, T. (2018). Competency Approach in Teaching of the Methodology and Organization of Scientifics Researches for the Future Specialists in Sociology. Sociological studios, 1(12), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2018-01-32-36.

4. Możgin, W. (2019). The Condition of a Modern University — Is There a Problem? Future Human Image, 11, 56-65. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/11/6.

5. Horban, O., Kravchenko, O., Martych, R., & Yukhymenko, N. (2019). The regulatory functions of education in behavioral models. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (3), 152-157. https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2019-3/23.

6. Lee, M., & Edmondson, A. (2017). Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 35-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2017.10.002.

7. Bazaluk, O. (2019). The Revival of the Notion of Arete in Contemporary Philosophy. Schole, 13(1), 198-207. https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-1-198-207.

8. Sakun, A., & Mordous, I. (2019). Digital Re-Evolution: Learning to be Human at Contemporary Society. Philosophy and Cosmology, 22, 129-136. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/22/11.

9. Oleksiyenko, A. (2019). Why Is Governance Research Important for University Reforms in Ukraine? Ukrainian Policymaker, 4, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.29202/up/4/5.

10. Bazaluk, O. (2019). Plato’s Traditions in Modern Educational Theories. Annals of the University of Craiova – Philosophy Series, 43(1/2019), 5-20.

11. Meissner, D., & Shmatko, N. (2019). Integrating professional and academic knowledge: the link between researchers skills and innovation culture. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 1273-1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9662-8.

12. Pavlova, O. (2018). Classic University as Institutional Form of Human Action. Future Human Image, 9, 92-99. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/9/9.

13. Bain, A., & Zundans-Fraser, L. (2017). The self-organizing University: Designing the higher education organization for quality learning and teaching. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4917-0.

14. Eliopoulos, P. (2019). From the Moral Limits of Personal Interest to the Derogation of Individual Identity: Colonialism and Oppression. Ukrainian Policymaker, 4, 4-12. https://doi.org/10.29202/up/4/1.

• < Prev
• Next >