Науковий вісник НГУ

Influence of pulse excitation on electromechanical indicators of a linear pulse converter of electrodynamic type

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Contens №3 2020

Last Updated on 13 September 2020

Published on 02 July 2020

Hits: 3638

Authors:

V. F. Bolyukh, Dr. Sc. (Tech.), Prof., Professor of the Department of General Electrical Engineering, orcid.org/0000-0001-9115-7828, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kharkiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Yu. V. Kashanskyi, Postgraduate Student of the Department of General Electrical Engineering, orcid.org/0000-0002-1532-9613, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kharkiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

I. S. Shchukin, Cand. Sc. (Tech.), Assoc. Prof., Associate Professor of the Department of Electric machines, orcid.org/0000-0001-7982-8633, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kharkiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2020, (3): 73-80

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-3/073

повний текст / full article

Abstract:

Purpose. Investigation of the effect of pulsed excitation of the electronic circuit-controlled inductor and armature windings, powered with the capacitive energy storage (CES) source, on the speed and power indicators of a linear pulse electrodynamic converter (LPEC).

Methodology. On the basis of the developed numerical model, the influence of pulsed excitation — vibrationally damped, half-wave, aperiodic, and aperiodic with recharge, on the characteristics and performance of LPEC is studied. The mathematical model of the LPEC, using the lumped parameters of the stationary winding of the inductor and the movable winding of the armature, takes into account the interconnected electromagnetic, mechanical and thermal processes, presenting their solutions in a recursive form.

Findings. It was found that the pulse excitation of the LPEC insignificantly affects the maximum speed, the pulse of electrodynamic forces (EDF) and the temperature rise of the inductor winding. The highest values of the maximum speed and impulse of an EDF arise upon excitation by a vibrationally damped current pulse, while the smallest ones – upon excitation by an aperiodic pulse. The LPEC excitation by an aperiodic current pulse with recharge allows the use of a reduced charge voltage for rechargeable CES. With a decrease in this voltage and with conservation of the energy of the CES, the amplitude of the EDF decreases by 31.5 %, but due to the delay of electromagnetic processes, the pulse of the EDF increases by 3 %, and the efficiency – by 8.2 %.

Originality. A comprehensive criterion for the LPEC efficiency was introduced, which takes into account the amplitude of the excitation current, the mass of the windings, the temperature of the inductor winding, the magnitude of the EDF pulse, the efficiency, and the maximum speed for a given reliability coefficient. Using this criterion, we found that in terms of power and speed indicators, the most efficient is a converter excited by an aperiodic current pulse with recharge, and the quality of work is a converter excited by an aperiodic pulse.

Practical value. The influence of the width of the copper bus and the corresponding axial heights of the windings of the inductor and the armature on the speed and power performance of the LPEC using vibration-damping, half-wave, aperiodic and aperiodic with recharge current pulses is established.

References.

1. Zhang, T., Guo, W., Lin, F., Cao, B., Dong, Z., Ren, R., …, & Su, Z. (2013). Experimental results from a 4-stage synchronous induction coil gun. IEEE Transactions on plasma science, 41(5), 1084-1088. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2013.2249116.

2. Go, B.-S., Le, D.-V., Song, M.-G., Park, M., & Yu, I.-K. (2019). Design and electromagnetic analysis of an induction-type coilgun system with a pulse power module. IEEE Transactions on plasma science, 47(1), 971-976. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2018.2874955.

3. Gorodzha, K. A., Podoltsev, O. D., & Troshchynskyi, B. A. (2019). Electromagnetic processes in pulse electrodynamic emitter for exciting elastic oscillations in concrete structures. Technical Electrodynamics, (3), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.15407/techned2019.03.023.

4. Angquist, L., Baudoin, A., Norrga, S., Nee, S., & Modeer, T. (2018). Low-cost ultra-fast DC circuit-breaker: Power electronics integrated with mechanical switchgear. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), Lyon, (pp. 1708-1713). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2018.8352439.

5. Vilchis-Rodriguez, D. S., Shuttleworth, R., Smith, A. C., & Barne, M. (2018). A comparison of damping techniques for the soft-stop of ultra-fast linear actuators for HVDC breaker applications. The 9 ^th International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD), Liverpool, UK, (pp. 1-6). Retrieved from https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/files/68110674/Soft_stop_techniques_full_paper_Final.pdf.

6. Vilchis-Rodriguez, D. S., Shuttleworth, R., & Barnes, M. (2017). Modelling thomson coils with axis-symmetric problems: practical accuracy considerations. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 32(2), 629-639. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2017.2651979.

7. Kondratiuk, M., & Ambroziak, L. (2016). Concept of the magnetic launcher for medium class unmanned aerial vehicles designed on the basis of numerical calculations. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 54(1), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.15632/jtam-pl.54.1.163.

8. Bissal, A., Magnusson, J., & Engdahl, G. (2012). Comparison of two ultra-fast actuator concept. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 48(11), 3315-3318. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2012.2198447.

9. Bolyukh, V. F., Kashanskij, Y. V., & Schukin, I. S. (2019). Influence of geometrical parameters of the inductor and armature on the indicators of a linear pulse electromechanical converter of an electrodynamic type. Electrical engineering & electromechanics, (3), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2019.3.02.

10. Fan, G., Wang, Y., Xu, Q., Nie, X., & Zhongming, Y. (2019). Design and analysis of a novel three-coil reconnection electromagnetic launcher. IEEE transactions on plasma science, 47(1), 814-820. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2018.2874287.

11. Bolyukh, V. F., & Katkov, I. I. (2013). Cryogenic cooling system “Krioblast” increased efficiency and lowered the operation time of protective electrical induction-induced devices. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings IMECE 2013, 8 B, San Diego, CA; US, code105847. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2013-62383.

12. Niu, X., Li, W., & Feng, J. (2019). Nonparametric modeling and parameter optimization of multistage synchronous induction coilgun. IEEE Transactions on plasma science, 47(7), 3246-3255. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2019.2918157.

13. Bolyukh, V. F., & Shchukin, I. S. (2012). The thermal state of an electromechanical induction converter with impact action in the cyclic operation mode. Russian Electrical Engineering, 83(10), 571-576. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068371212100045.

14. Liu, X., Yu, X., Ban, R., & Li, Z. (2017). Analysis of the capacitor-aided meat grinder circuits for an inductive pulsed power supply. IEEE Transactions on plasma science, 45(7), 1339-1346. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2017.2705179.

15. Zhou, Y., Huang, Y., Wen, W., Lu, J., Cheng, T., & Gao, S. (2019). Research on a novel drive unit of fast mechanical switch with modular double capacitors. Journal of Engineering, (17), 4345-4348. https://doi.org/10.1049/joe.2018.8148.

• < Prev
• Next >