Науковий вісник НГУ

The combined method for assessing risk factors in underground construction

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 1

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Contens №3 2020

Last Updated on 13 September 2020

Published on 02 July 2020

Hits: 3870

Authors:

B. B. Imansakipova, PhD, Head of the Department of Mine Surveying and Geodesy, orcid.org/0000-0003-0658-2112, Satbayev University, Almaty, the Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O. O. Sdvyzhkova, Dr. Sc. (Tech.), Prof., Head of Department, orcid.org/0000-0001-6322-7526, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, e‑mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Sh. K. Aitkazinova, PhD, Senior Lecturer, the Department of Surveying and Geodesy, orcid.org/0000-0002-0964-3008, Satbayev University, Almaty, the Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

K. Z. Isabayev, Lecturer of the Department of Special Disciplines, orcid.org/0000-0001-5183-3668, Military Engineering Institute of Radio Electronics and Communications, Almaty, the Republic of Kazakhstan

G. Shakieva, PhD Student, orcid.org/0000-0002-1968-5738, Satbayev University, Almaty, the Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2020, (3): 53-58

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-3/053

повний текст / full article

Abstract:

Purpose. Development of a combined method for qualitative and quantitative assessment of risk factors accompanying the construction and operation of underground constructions based on expert analysis and mathematical modeling by numerical methods.

Methodology. When creating a comprehensive method for ranking the underground construction route by the degree of problems, we used methods of expert assessment, statistical analysis and mathematical modeling, which allow us to assess the state of each section by summing the points of risk factors assessment.

Findings. Based on the results of practical application of the developed method for ranking the Almaty metro route sections by the degree of problems, the method has shown its effectiveness in solving the problems of ensuring the safety of construction and operation of the metro and has been adopted for implementation.

Originality. Assessment of the condition of the underground construction route section according to the degree of problematicity in accordance with the principle of adding risk factors through conditional points established by the results of expert analysis and mathematical modeling.

Practical value. The method improves the effectiveness of monitoring the state of the underground construction route, improves the quality of situational control as well as the forecast of the manifestation of risk situations and their development. The method can be used for solving similar problems in underground construction of different objects, including the development of mineral deposits.

References.

1. Solodyankin, O. V., Shepel, N. M., & Shapoval, V. H. (2018). Protection of objects from the influence of long-term dynamic loads. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (3), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2018-3/11.

2. Pankratova, N., Gayko, G., Kravets, V., & Savchenko, I. (2016). Problems of Megapolises Underground Space System Planning. Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, 48(4), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.1615/JAutomatInfScien.v48.i4.40.

3. Imansakipova, B. B. (2019). Expert risk analysis of the state of sections of the main oil pipeline and their ranking by the degree of problems. Mining journal of Kazakhstan, 10(174), 37-41.

4. Spitsyn, A. A., Imansakipova, B. B., Chernov, A. V., & Kidirbayev, B. I. (2019). Development of scientific and methodological basis for identifying weakened zones on the earth’s surface of ore deposits. Mining journal of Russia, 9(2266), 63-66.

5. Alidoosti, A., Yazdani, M., Fouladgar, M. M., & Basiri, M. H. (2012). Risk assessment of critical asset using fuzzy inference system. Risk Management, 14, 77-91. http://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2011.19.

6. Han Yi Wang, & Samuel, R. (2016). 3D Geomechanical Modeling of Salt Creep Behavior on Wellbore Casing for Pre-Salt Reservoirs. SPE Drilling and Completion, 31(4), 261-272. https://doi.org/10.2118/166144-PA.

7. Sadykov, B. B., Baygurin, Zh. D., Altayeva, A. A., Kozhaev, Zh. T., & Stelling, W. (2019). New approach to zone division of surface of the deposit by the degree of sinkhole risk. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (6), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2019-6/5.

8. Strokova, L. A., & Ermolaeva, A. V. (2016). Zoning of the territory according to the degree of danger of subsidence of the earth’s surface in the design of the main gas pipeline in South Yakutia. Proceedings of Tomsk Polytechnic University. Engineering of georesources, 327(10), 59-68.

9. Haiko, H. I., Savchenko, I. O., & Matviichuk, I. O. (2019). Development of amorphological model for territorial development of underground city space. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (3), 92-98. https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2019-3/14.

10. Pankratova, N. D., Savchenko, I. O., Gayko, G. I., & Kravets, V. G. (2018). Evaluating Perspectives of Urban Underground Construction Using Modified Morphological Analysis Method. Problems of Control and Informatics, 5, 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1615/JAutomatInfScien.v50.i10.30.

11. Nedashkovskaya, N. I. (2015). Method for evaluation of the uncertainty of the paired comparisons expert judgements when calculating the decision alternatives weights. Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, 47(10), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1615/JAutomatInfScien.v47.i10.70.

12. Samigullin, G. H., Egorova, D. V., & Kutukov, S. E. (2016). Risk level analysis as a method of ensuring safe operation of the linear part of main pipelines. Bulletin of young scientist UGNTU. Ufa state petroleum technical University, 4(8), 207-211.

13. Zienkiewicz, O., & Taylor, R. (2013). The Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics. 7^th Edition. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/books/the-finite-element-method-for-solid-and-structural-mechanics/zienkiewicz/978-1-85617-634-7.

14. Babets, D., Sdvyzhkova, O., Shashenko, O., Kravchenko, K., & Cabana, E.C. (2019). Implementation of probabilistic approach to rock mass strength estimation while excavating through fault zones. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 13(4), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.33271/mining13.04.072.

15. Babets, D. V., Sdvyzhkova, O. O., Larionov, M. H., & Tereshchuk, R. M. (2017). Estimation of rock mass stability based on probability approach and rating systems. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (2), 58-64.

16. Carranza-Torres, C., & Diederichs, M. (2009). Mechanical analysis of circular liners with particular reference to composite supports. For example, liners consisting of shotcrete and steel sets. Tunneling and Underground Space, 24(5), 506-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2009.02.001.

17. Małkowski, P., Ostrowski, L., & Bachanek, P. (2017). Modelling the Small Throw Fault Effect on the Stability of a Mining Roadway and Its Verification by In Situ Investigation. Energies, 10(12), 1-21. http://doi.org/10.3390/en10122082.

• < Prev
• Next >