Науковий вісник НГУ

An integrated method for evaluating the quality of education and university performance

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Parent Category: 2021

Category: Content №3 2021

Created on 23 June 2021

Last Updated on 23 June 2021

Published on 30 November -0001

Written by A. Ye. Artyukhov, T. A. Vasylieva, S. V. Lyeonov

Hits: 5393

Authors:

A.Ye.Artyukhov, orcid.org/0000-0003-1112-6891, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

T.A.Vasylieva, orcid.org/0000-0003-0635-7978, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

S.V.Lyeonov, orcid.org/0000-0001-5639-3008, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2021, (3): 148 - 154

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-3/148

Abstract:

Purpose. To create an integrated methodology for assessing educational and scientific activities of higher education institutions (HEI) following the recommendations of international ranking agencies and specific indicators that consider the institutions position at the national level.

Methodology. The combined method of evaluation of the HEI activity is applied. Some evaluation indicators are inherent in the HEI (in whole or in part). Others have a specific numerical value. The calculation of the final ranking indicator is based on comparing universities according to the indicators from the methodology (ranking positions in the world educational and scientific space, education quality indicators, financial indicators, and quality of scientific activity) with the reference university, which has the best result for each indicator.

Findings. An integrated methodology algorithm for assessing the educational and scientific activities of the HEI is presented and recommendations are given for the use of each of the indicators depending on the peculiarities of the ranking (for example, general ranking or ranking by direction).

Originality. An integrated method of external evaluation of educational and scientific activities is proposed, considering both well-known indicators of world ranking agencies and specific (different from world ranking indicators) indicators for assessing universities activities at the national level.

Practical value. The method allows determining some economic indicators of the dynamics (positive or negative) of university development and finding bottlenecks in the implementation of specific activities in the institutions educational and scientific activities. The methodology considers the actual educational activities (training of higher education institutions at all levels). It also allows us to assess the success of free economics in implementing scientific activities as a significant factor in creating new knowledge and improving educational services quality.

Keywords: quality of education, technology transfer, economic development, evaluation methods, external evaluation

References.

1. Vasylieva, T.A., & Kasyanenko, V.O. (2013). Integral assessment of innovation potential of Ukraines national economy: A scientific methodical approach and practical calculations. Actual Problems of Economics, 144(6), 50-59. Retrieved from https://eco-science.net/downloads/.

2. Vorontsova, A., Vasylieva, T., Bilan, Y., Ostasz, G., & Mayboroda,T. (2020). The influence of state regulation of education for achieving the sustainable development goals: Case study of central and eastern european countries. Administratie Si Management Public, 2020(34), 6-26. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2020.34-01.

3. Lyeonov, S., & Liuta, O. (2016). Actual problems of finance teaching in Ukraine in the post-crisis period. In T., Azarmi, & W., Amann (Eds.). (2016). The financial crisis: Implications for research and teaching, (pp. 145-152). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20588-5.

4. Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2006). Entpreprenerial universities andtechnologytransfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5029-z.

5. Hanushek, E.A. (2005). Why quality matters in education. Finance and Development, 42(2), 15-19. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252555388_Why_Quality_Matters_in_Education.

6. Todorut, A.V. (2016). A new architecture of quality in education. Quality Access to Success, 17(153), 60-63. Retrieved from https://www.srac.ro/calitatea/en/arhiva/2016/2016-04-Abstracts.pdf.

7. Mantovani, D., Gouvea, M., & Conejero, M. (2013). Quality Gap Analysis on Education Services. International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, 2(5), 30-39. Retrieved from https://www.humanities.mn/fileman/Uploads/MD_handbook/Erdenechimeg.E/3%20ARTICLE%20IN%20GAP%20ANALYSIS%20IN%20EDUCATIONAL.pdf .

8. Keban, Y.B., Arifin, S., & Wahyono, R. (2019). SWOT Analysis and Its Implementation Strategies in Educational Management. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(12), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/10-12-10.

9. Cox, J. (2021). The higher education environment driving academic library strategy: A political, economic, social and technological (PEST) analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), 102219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102219.

10. Ehrenberg, R.G. (2004). Econometric Studies of Higher Education. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 19-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.008.

11. Hazelkorn, E. (2013). How Rankings are Reshaping Higher Education. in Climent, V., Michavila, F., & Ripolles, M. (Eds.) (2013). Los Rankings Univeritarios. Mitos y Realidades. Retrieved from https://arrow.tudublin.ie/cserbk/23/.

12. Vernon, M.M., Balas, E.A., & Momani, S. (2018). Are university rankings useful to improve research? A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 13(3), e0193762. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193762.

13. Keupp, M.M., Palmi, M., & Gassmann, O. (2012). The strategic management of innovation: A systematic review and paths for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 367-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00321.x.

14. Sutherland, W.J., Goulson, D., Potts, S.G., & Dicks,L.V. (2011). Quantifying the Impact and Relevance of Scientific Research. PLoS ONE, 6(11), e27537. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027537.

15. Ranking WEB of Universities (n.d.). Retrieved from http://webometrics.info/en.

16. World University Rankings. THE (Times Higher Education) (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings.

17. QS World University Rankings (2021). Retrieved from https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2021.

18. Ranking of universities for the IT industry 2020 (2020). Retrieved from https://dou.ua/lenta/articles/ukrainian-universities-2020/.

19.State Enterprise Ukrainian Institute of Intellectual Property (Ukrpatent) (n.d.). Retrieved from https://ukrpatent.org/.

20. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (n.d.). Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/ua.

21. Pisarenko, T.V., & Kuranda, T.K. (2020). Scientific and scientific-technical activity in Ukraine in 2019: scientific-analytical report. yiv: UkrINTEI. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/nauka/informatsiyno-analitychni/2020/08/13/nadnaukaza2019-stisnuto.pdf.

22. NAQA Annual Report: 2019 (2020). Retrieved from https://naqa.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/%d0%97%d0%b2%d1%96%d1%82-2020.pdf.

23. Ranking of universities according to Scopus database 2020 (2020). Retrieved from http://osvita.ua/vnz/rating/72780/.

• < Prev
• Next >