Науковий вісник НГУ

Formation of the incentive role of the environmental tax in Ukraine

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Parent Category: 2021

Category: Content №3 2021

Created on 23 June 2021

Last Updated on 23 June 2021

Published on 30 November -0001

Written by A. Uzhva, S. Belinska, N. Rudenko

Hits: 4991

Authors:

A.Uzhva, orcid.org/0000-0001-5239-5516, Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

S.Belinska, orcid.org/0000-0001-6029-8804, Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

N.Rudenko, orcid.org/0000-0003-0500-9189, Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2021, (3): 095 - 099

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-3/095

Abstract:

Purpose. Developing trends for increasing the effectiveness of environmental tax as an institutional means of environmental protection and optimization of the tax burden.

Methodology. A set of scientific methods and approaches was used in the research, which provided an opportunity to form a conceptually integrated scientific work. For this purpose, the following was used: content analysis method to study the regulatory framework of the environmental tax; abstract-logical approach to analyze the differences between the revenues of the environmental tax to the budget and the amount of funds planned and funds spent on environmental protection; integrated system approach to compare environmental taxation in the European Union and Ukraine; method of logical generalization to make proposals on how to increase the efficiency of the environmental tax, optimize the tax burden and align with Ukraines international obligations.

Findings. A comparative analysis of environmental taxation in the European Union and Ukraine is conducted. The existing differences by types of environmental tax, the share of these types in the total amount of environmental tax and the purpose of environmental taxation in European countries and Ukraine are indicated. The dynamics of ecological tax revenues to the State budget and budget expenditures for environmental protection is studied. Trends in the dynamics of taxation, in particular, in creating a gap between revenues and expenditures are established. There is a tendency to form a significant gap in the amounts of environmental tax paid by enterprises. It is stated that only ten enterprises pay more than half of the countrys environmental tax.

Originality. The necessity of formation of the role of ecological taxes stimulating preservation of the environment is pointed out and particular directions of formation of such incentives are offered. Proposals for environmental tax policy have been developed. It is stated that the increase in the environmental tax should be consistent with the overall tax burden per capita. Increasing the environmental tax also requires a preliminary detailed analysis of how the impact of its increase will affect each large enterprise and industry and determination of approaches to increasing the environmental tax differentiated according to transparent principles.

Practical value. Recommendations are provided on how to increase the efficiency of the environmental tax as an institutional means of environmental protection, specific steps are proposed to optimize the tax burden and promote the norms approved by the Paris Climate Agreement and the Association Agreement with the EU.

Keywords: environmental tax reform, tax system, energy/carbon taxation, consolidated budget, tax burden

References.

1. 20^th Global Conference on Environmental Taxation (GCET20) (2019). Economic Policies for Low-Carbon Development. Cyprus University of Technology. Nicosia: Cyprus by Theopress Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.gcet20.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/gcet20_programme.pdf.

2. Nitsenko, V., Mardani, A., Streimikis, J., Shkrabak, I., Klopov, I., Novomlynets, O., & Podolska, O. (2018). Criteria for Evaluation of Efficiency of Energy Transformation Based on Renewable Energy Sources. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14(4), 253-263. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-4.17.

3. Kostenko, I. (2020). The Draft Law of Ukraine On the Extraction and Utilization of Natural Resources of the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies. Advanced Space Law, 6, 29-42. https://doi.org/10.29202/asl/6/4.

4. Tang, W., & Qiu, X. (2020). Construction of Law-based Government in the Context of Counteraction to COVID-19. Ukrainian Policymaker, 6, 74-84. https://doi.org/10.29202/up/6/8.

5. Williams III, R.S. (2016). Environmental Taxation. Discussion paper, (pp. 16-24). Wahington: RFF DP. Retrieved from https://media.rff.org/archive/files/document/file/RFF-DP-16-24.pdf.

6. Bazaluk, O., Havrysh, V., Nitsenko, V., Baleentis, T., Streimikiene, D., & Tarkhanova, E.A. (2020). Assessment of Green Methanol Production Potential and Related Economic and Environmental Benefits: The Case of China. Energies, 13(12), 3113. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123113.

7. Wang, K., Wang, J., Hubacek, K., Mi, Z., & Wei, Y.M. (2020). Acost-benefit analysis of the environmental taxation policy in China: A frontier analysis-based environmentally extended inputoutput optimization method. Journal of industrial ecology, 24, 3, 564-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12947.

8. Fan, X., Li, X., & Yin, J. (2019). Impact of environmental tax on green development: A nonlinear dynamical system analysis. PLoS ONE, 14(9), e0221264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221264.

9. Bilan, Y., Zos-Kior, M., Nitsenko, V., Sinelnikau, U., & Ilin, V. (2017). Social component in sustainable management of land resources. Journal of Security and Sustainability, 7(2), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2017.7.2(9).

10. Havrysh, V.I., & Nitsenko, V.S. (2016). Current state of world alternative motor fuels market. Actual problems of economics, 7(181), 41-52.

11. Carattini, S., Baranzini, A., Thalmann, P., Varone, P., & Vhringer, F. (2017). Green taxes in a post-Paris world: Are millions of nays inevitable. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68(1), 97-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0133-8.

12. Carattini, S., Carvalho, M., & Fankhauser, S. (2018). Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes. Wiley Interisciplinary Re-views. Climate Change, 9(5), e531. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.531.

13. Andreichenko, A., Andreichenko, S., & Smentyna, N. (2021). Ensuring Biosphere Balance in the Context of Agricultural Waste Management. Philosophy and Cosmology, 26, 46-61. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/26/4.

14. Andriushchenko, K., Datsii, O., Aleinikova, O., Abdulla Alebri Mohamed, & Ali Alhemeiri Mohammed (2019). Improvement of the water resources management system at the territorial level. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17, 421-437. http://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.34.

15. Levinson, A. (2019). Energy Efficiency Standards Are More Regressive Than Energy Taxes: Theory and Evidence. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 6(S1), 7-36. https://doi.org/10.1086/701186.

16. Kuralbayeva, K. (2019). Environmental Taxation, Employment and Public Spending in Developing Countries. Environmental and Resource Economics, 72, 877-912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-0230-3.

17. Tiezzi, S., & Xiao, E. (2016). Time delay, complexity and support for taxation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 77, 117-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.03.002.

18. Kalinichenko, A., Havrysh, V., & Nitsenko, V. (2019). Alternative Vehicle Fuel Management: Impact on Energy Security Indicators. In Krakowiak-Bal, A., & Vaverkova, M. (Eds.). Infrastructure and Environment, (pp. 367-374). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16542-0_45.

19. Ma, B. (2020). Value Shaping of Ecological Man: External Standard and Internal Idea. Future Human Image, 13, 57-65. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/13/6.

20. Mikhno, I., Koval, V., Shvets, G., Garmatiuk, O., & Tamoinien,R. (2021). Discussion: Green Economy in Sustainable Development and Improvement of Resource Efficiency. Central European Business Review, 10(XX), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.252.

• < Prev
• Next >