Науковий вісник НГУ

State and regional policy on industrial waste management: the EU experience for Ukraine

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Parent Category: 2021

Category: Content №3 2021

Created on 23 June 2021

Last Updated on 23 June 2021

Published on 30 November -0001

Written by P. Pokataiev, I. Garkavyy, V. Koltun, N. Shamrai, K. Kramarenko

Hits: 5099

Authors:

P.Pokataiev, orcid.org/0000-0003-3806-2197, Classical Private University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

I.Garkavyy, orcid.org/0000-0002-5431-019X, Classical Private University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

V.Koltun, orcid.org/0000-0001-8432-873X, National Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

N.Shamrai, orcid.org/0000-0002-6222-6385, Kyiv City State Administration, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

K.Kramarenko, orcid.org/0000-0001-9601-2003, National Academy of the National Guard of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2021, (3): 111 - 116

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-3/111

Abstract:

Purpose. To identify the main trends caused by the divergence of the policy of Ukraine and the EU in the formation and accumulation of waste and threats to the environment.

Methodology. Using the methods of content analysis, quantitative and qualitative comparison, EU policy on waste management is analyzed and logical generalization is used to establish the features of waste management financing for industries and regions.

Findings. Regional irregularities of industrial waste accumulation, including hazardous waste, trends of their change are revealed. The reasons for regional peculiarities of waste management in the EU and Ukraine are established. It is established that the distribution of capital investments both in environmental protection in general and in waste management in particular does not always coincide with the leading regions of accumulation. It is established that limitation of financial instruments for waste management only by budgetary resources leads to a reduction in capital investment. A comparison of trends in environmental spending and waste management indicated a significant difference. Analysis of environmental investment by polluting industries, which are unevenly represented in different regions, revealed a significant difference between them.

Originality. Regions that are the main polluters have been identified. The discrepancy between trends of capital investments in environmental protection and waste management was revealed. It is established that the list of leading regions in terms of capital investments in environmental protection does not correlate with the list of leading regions of waste accumulation. It is pointed out that uneven investment creates risks of increasing the rate of waste accumulation, in particular hazardous waste. Forecasting of indicators of waste management of the following periods is carried out.

Practical value. There are risks of increasing the rate of waste accumulation, especially hazardous waste, both in Ukraine in general and in some regions, inequalities in some areas in the amount of capital investment into environmental protection, which will form an effective waste management policy. Identifying common features and differences in waste management in the EU and Ukraine will allow implementing effective environmental protection tools, reducing risks in industrial waste management.

Keywords: industrial waste, state policy, settlements, regions

References.

1. Andreichenko, A., Andreichenko, S., & Smentyna, N. (2021). Ensuring Biosphere Balance in the Context of Agricultural Waste Management. Philosophy and Cosmology, 26, 46-61. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/26/4.

2. Pavlova, O. (2018). Politically-Technological Potential of Cultural Practices in Ukrainian Perspective. Ukrainian Policymaker, 2, 20-26. https://doi.org/10.29202/up/2/3.

3. Analytical note on the state of implementation of the first stage of implementation of the National Waste Management Strategy in Ukraine until 2030 (2019). Retrieved from http://epl.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/analitychna-zapyska-Natsstartegiya.docx.

4. Bondar, O.I. (Ed) (2016). National report on the implementation of national environmental policy. Kherson, FOP Green DS Company Publishing House. Retrieved from http://dea.edu.ua/img/source/Doc/ecopol.pdf.

5. Krichevsky, S., & Levchenko, V. (2021). Human Life and Evolution in Biospheres on Earth and Outer Space: Problems and Prospects. Future Human Image, 15, 39-58. Retrieved from http://www.fhijournal.org/15-4/.

6. Bilan, Y., Nitsenko, V., & Havrysh, V. (2017). Energy aspect of vertical integration in agriculture. Rynek Energii, 5(132), 98-110.

7. Voitsikhovska, A., Kravchenko, O., Melen-Zabramna, O., & Pankevych, M. (2019). European best waste management practices. Lviv, Manuscript Company Publishing House. Retrieved from http://epl.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Krashchi_ES_praktuku_NET.pdf.

8. Soroka, L. (2020). Modern Challenges to Establishing Global Law on Sustainable Development of Space Activities. Advanced Space Law, 6, 64-71. https://doi.org/10.29202/asl/6/7.

9. Chukurna, O., Nitsenko, V., Kralia, V., Sahachko, Y., Morkunas,M., & Volkov, A. (2019). Modelling and Managing the Effect of Transferring the Dynamics of Exchange Rates on Prices of Machine-Building Enterprises in Ukraine. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.1.09.

10. Ciua, J., Gaska, K., Siedlarz, D., & Koval, V. (2019). Management of sewage sludge energy use with the application of bi-functional bioreactor as an element of pure production in industry. E3S Web of Conferences, 123, 01016. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912301016.

11. Cabannes, Y. (2019). The contribution of participatory budgeting to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals lessons for policy in Commonwealth countries. Common wealth Journal of Local Governance, 21, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.v0i21.6707.

12. Ili, M., & Nikoli, M. (2019). Drivers for development of circular economy A case study of Serbia. Habitat International, 56, 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.06.003.

13. Prieto-Sandoval, V., Jaca, C., & Ormazabal, M. (2018). Towards a consensus on the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 605-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224.

14. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E. (2017). The Circular Economy A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143(1), 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.048.

15. Reike, D., Vermeulen, W.J.V., & Witjes, S. (2018). The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 246-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027.

16. Ghisolfi, V., Chaves, G.D.L.D., Siman, R.R., & Xavier, L.H. (2017). System dynamics applied to closed loop supply chains of desktops and laptops in Brazil: A perspective for social inclusion of waste pickers. Waste Management, 60, 14-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.

17. Aderoju, O.M., Dias, G.A., & Gonalves, A.J. (2018). A GIS-based analysis for sanitary landfill sites in Abuja, Nigeria. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22, 551574 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0206-z.

18. Bazaluk, O., Havrysh, V., Nitsenko, V., Baleentis, T., Streimikiene, D., & Tarkhanova, E.A. (2020). Assessment of Green Methanol Production Potential and Related Economic and Environmental Benefits: The Case of China. Energies, 13(12), 3113. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123113.

19. Bazaluk, O., Havrysh, V., & Nitsenko, V. (2021). Energy and Environmental Assessment of Straw Production for Power Generation. E3S Web of Conferences, 228, 01010. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202122801010.

20. Koval, V., Mikhno, I., Trokhymets, O., Kustrich, L., & Vdovenko,N. (2020). Modeling the interaction between environment and the economy considering the impact on ecosystem. E3S Web of Conferences, 166, 13002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016613002.

• < Prev
• Next >