Науковий вісник НГУ

The environmental regulation of mining: legal foundations

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Parent Category: 2021

Category: Content №3 2021

Created on 23 June 2021

Last Updated on 23 June 2021

Published on 30 November -0001

Written by O. Vasylchenko, O. Lotiuk, A. Yevstihnieiev, A. Basalaieva, S. Kustova

Hits: 4706

Authors:

O.Vasylchenko, orcid.org/0000-0002-4464-3708, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.Lotiuk, orcid.org/0000-0001-7119-754X, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

A.Yevstihnieiev, orcid.org/0000-0001-6994-1069, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

A.Basalaieva, orcid.org/0000-0001-7558-2621, National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

S.Kustova, orcid.org/0000-0003-3563-1454, Katerynchuk, Moor and Partners Law Firm, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2021, (3): 106 - 110

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-3/106

Abstract:

Purpose. To enhance the quality of Ukrainian legislation by improving the legal framework of public administration in the field of environmental regulation of mining in Ukraine.

Methodology. The authors used comparative and legal, historical, systemic, structural and functional, formal and logical, and dialectical research methods. The need to use an integrated research method is emphasized.

Findings. The authors investigated two problems actualized by the so-called Adani Syndrome:

1. The criteria for assessing the impact on the environment and their legal force.

2. The legal framework governing the rights of the owner, the state and the public.

The above problems were studied in comparison with the legal support of environmental regulation of mining in Ukraine.

Originality. The experience of environmental regulation of mining in Australia is analyzed on the example of the conflict over the Carmichael mine project, resulting in disclosing the current state of Ukrainian legislation in this area. The directions of improving the legal foundations of public administration in the field of environmental regulation of mining in Ukraine have been brought up for discussion.

Practical value. The use of the obtained results will make it possible to eliminate the difference between the legal support of environmental regulation of mining in developed and developing countries. The proposals have been formulated to improve the legal regulation in the area under study in terms of detailing the powers of individual governing bodies of special competence, as well as in terms of procedures for assessing the environmental impact. The formulated proposals can help to strengthen the effectiveness of the legislation in power.

Keywords: public participation, environmental regulation, mining, Adani Syndrome, environmental consciousness

References.

1. McNamara, N., & Crane, W. (2018). Public participation and the Adani Syndrome. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 35(3), 320-330.

2. Vasylchenko, O.P., Lotiuk, O.S., & Gut, N.Y. (2018). Civil society as the subject of formation of state policy in the sphere of subsoil use and protection. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (6), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2018/20.

3. Renn, O., Ulmer, F., Anna Deckert, A. (Eds.) (2020). The Role of Public Participation in Energy Transitions. Academic Press.

4. Yevstihnieiev, A. (2018). Ecological safety of special nature management in Ukraine in the context of sustainable development: theoretical and legal aspects: monograph. Kyiv: Gordon.

5. Hasan, M.A., Nahiduzzaman, K.M., & Aldosary, A.S. (2018). Public participation in EIA: A comparative study of the projects run by government and non-governmental organizations. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 72, 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.05.001.

6. Ma, Bo (2020). Value Shaping of Ecological Man: External Standard and Internal Idea. Future Human Image, 13, 57-65. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/13/6.

7. International Association for Public Participation (2021). Retrieved from https://iap2usa.org/.

8. Adani mine: Australia approves controversial coal project (2019). BBC News, 13 June 2019. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-48618774?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world&link_location=live-reporting-story.

9. Haiko, H., Saik, P., & Lozynskyi, V. (2019). The Philosophy of Mining: Historical Aspect and Future Prospect. Philosophy and Cosmology, 22, 76-90. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/22/6.

10. Nalule, V.R. (2020). Social and Environmental Impacts of Mining. In: Mining and the Law in Africa. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33008-8_3.

11. Stewart, A.G. (2020). Mining is bad for health: a voyage of discovery. Environ Geochem Health, 42, 1153-1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-019-00367-7.

12. Bezzubov, D., & Pravotorova, O. (2020). The Impact of Transnational Corporations on the Regulatory Framework for the World Market for Space Services and Technologies. Advanced Space Law, 6, 4-12. https://doi.org/10.29202/asl/6/1.

13. Colvin, R. (2020). Social identity in the energy transition: an analysis of the Stop Adani Convoy to explore social-political conflict in Australia. Energy Research & Social Science, 66, 101492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101492.

14. Uhl, C. (2020). Developing Ecological Consciousness: Becoming Fully Human. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

15. Pylypenko, H., Lytvynenko, N., & Barna, T. (2019). Socio-Cultural Context of Innovative Development. Philosophy and Cosmology, 23, 98-111. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/23/9.

16. Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (2021). Australian Government. Retrieved from https://www.awe.gov.au/about.

17. Ministry of energy and environment protection of Ukraine (2021). Retrieved from https://mepr.gov.ua/en/.

18. Yevstigneyev, A. (2017). Legal providing of ecological safety of special nature use in the context of the Law of Ukraine On Environmental Impact Assessment. Chasopys Kyyivskoho universytetu prava, 2, 201-204.

19. Law of Ukraine On Environmental Impact Assessment (2020). Revision on December 1, 2020. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2059-19?lang=en#Text.

20. Frantsuz, A. (2020). Central and Eastern Europe the Globalization Process, Hybrid Threats: Political and Legal Aspects. Ukrainian Policymaker, 6, 24-31. https://doi.org/10.29202/up/6/3.

21. Law of Ukraine About the Basic principles (strategy) of the state ecological policy of Ukraine for the period till 2030 (2019). Adoption on February 28, 2019. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2697-19?lang=en#Text.

• < Prev
• Next >