Науковий вісник НГУ

The impact of knowledge components on the world competitiveness

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №1 2021

Last Updated on 05 March 2021

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 2620

Authors:

Olena Tkachenko, orcid.org/0000-0003-2923-7186, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Iryna Kulaga, orcid.org/0000-0002-2148-1435, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Larysa Kozlovska, orcid.org/0000-0002-0523-9913, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Oleh Shvidanenko, orcid.org/0000-0001-7369-1762, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Tetiana Busarieva, orcid.org/0000-0001-9563-8120, Kyiv University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2021, (1): 198 - 203

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-1/198

Abstract:

Purpose. To analyze the impact of the knowledge component on the level of global competitiveness of the world.

Methodology. The methodological basis of the article is the methods and forms of scientific knowledge adopted in domestic science, such as system approaches, comparative and synthesis methods, methods of abstract logical evaluation, methods of detailing, groupings and generalizations, experts evaluations; dynamics series, logic analysis, paired and multiple correlation techniques. Moreover, the Google Trends search engine was used, since the use of this search tool allowed drawing the following conclusions: searches for both concepts in the world and in Ukraine are substantially different: both concepts in the global space, particularly in countries with a high level of competitiveness, are hardly in demand.

Findings. Knowledge as an economic category and practical skill permeates all spheres of human life. Currently, knowledge formation is concentrated within TNCs localized in the developed countries of the world (the USA, Singapore, the EU countries, Japan, and others), which is confirmed by the level of competitiveness of the economy of these countries and high ranking of the knowledge component in it. In the overall rating of competitiveness of the influence of the components of the knowledge economy, Ukraine ranks below average, while science now barely crosses the threshold of performing a sociocultural function and begins to perform a cognitive one.

Originality. Globalization processes and technological revolution of recent decades have transformed knowledge and intellectual capital into key drivers of competitiveness in the world. We have formed and studied groups of subjective (regional and state policy, which determines the quality of economic and financial processes, as well as the management of the public sector) and objective (geographic, natural and climatic conditions, the degree of sufficiency in raw materials, infrastructure, and others) factors affecting competitiveness of countries. According to the research results, the use of this approach allows for continuous monitoring of the competitiveness level of social and economic indicators in order to identify and eliminate bottlenecks in various levels of state management.

Practical value. The authors approach suggested is recommended to be used by scientific institutes, universities, government bodies and services for monitoring socio-economic indicators included in the groups of objective and subjective factors in order to form a holistic understanding and systematic analysis of the influence of the competitiveness of the knowledge component on different aspects of the countrys social and economic life.

Keywords: knowledge, knowledge economy, world competitiveness, national economies, globalization

References.

1. Hang, C.C., Garnsey, E., & Ruan, Y. (2015). Opportunities for disruption. Technovation, 39-40, 88-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2014.11.005.

2. Melnyk, T. (2018). Ukraine and Its Future in a Globalised International Community. Ukrainian Policymaker, 3, 17-28. https://doi.org/10.29202/up/3/3.

3. Iliashenko, S.M. (2016). Innovative development: marketing and knowledge management. Sumy: Disa Plus LLC.

4. Soroka, L., & Kurkova, K. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Space Technologies: Legal, Ethical and Technological Issues. Advanced Space Law, 3, 131-139. https://doi.org/10.29202/asl/2019/3/11.

5. Shevchuk, O.A. (2018). System-synergetic approach to providing dynamic stability of enterprises based business leadership. Economic bulletin of NTUU KPI, 15, 199-207.

6. Rudenko, M., & Kryvoruchko, V. (2016). Knowledge management as a competitive advantage of enterprise. Ekonomika ta derzhava, (4), 74-78.

7. Awwad, M. (2018). Influences of Freges Predicate Logic on Some Computational Models. Future Human Image, 9, 5-19. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/9/1.

8. Novikova, M.M. (2017). Concept genesis intellectual capital of the company. Market Infrastructure, 5, 108-112.

9. Andriushchenko, K., Lavruk, V., Uliganets, S., Kovtun, V., & Matviienko, H. (2019). Reputation Risk Management Companies Based on Competence Approach. TEM Journal, 8(2), 516-524. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM82-27.

10. Breznik, K. (2018). Knowledge Management from its Inception to the Innovation Linkage. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 238, 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.03.017.

11. Yi, Y., Meng, M., & Wei, Z. (2017). Bottom-up learning, strategic flexibility and strategicchange. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(2), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-12-2015-024.

12. Baharun, R., Jing Mi, T., Streimikiene, D., Mardani, A., Shakeel, J., & Nitsenko, V. (2019). Innovation in healthcare performance among private brands healthcare services in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 16(5), 151-172. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.16.5.2019.5.9.

13. Tretyak, O.A., & Klimanov, D.E. (2016). New Approach to Business Model Analysis. Russian Management Journal, 14(1), 115-130.

14. Yatsenko, O., Nitsenko, V., Mardani, A., Streimikiene, S., & Tananaiko, T. (2019). Global Risks of Trade and Economic Cooperation of Ukraine with Countries of the Northern American Region. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 15(3), 217-225. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2019.15-3.16.

15. OECD (2016). Enabling Chinas Transition towards a Knowledge-based Economy: (Chinese version). Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266858-zh.

16. Kholiavko, N., Popova, L., Marych, M., Hanzhurenko,I., Koliadenko, S., & Nitsenko, V. (2020). Comprehensive methodological approach to estimating the research component influence on the information economy development. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (4), 192-199. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-4/192.

• < Prev
• Next >