Науковий вісник НГУ

Defining the standard of market analysis in sectors of strong SOE presence

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №6 2020

Last Updated on 22 December 2020

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 2300

Authors:

N.Mazaraki, orcid.org/0000-0002-1729-7846, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

A.Gerasymenko, orcid.org/0000-0003-0313-6942, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2020, (6): 136 - 141

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-6/136

Abstract:

Purpose. Defining of the criteria that determine a choice of the standard of market analysis in the sectors with strong presence of state-owned enterprises (SOEs).

Methodology. The methodological basis of the study is a comparative analysis of the principles of classifying SOEs and SOEs activities in different countries and the results of their analysis under neoclassical and institutional standards that have resulted in the set of criteria which determine the prerequisites of applying certain standard.

Findings. The paper grounds the impermissibility of the common use of the neoclassical standard of market analysis in sectors of strong SOE presence. It specifies the set of criteria that determine when each of the standards (neoclassical and institutional ones) should be applied.

Originality. The criteria that determine a choice of the standard of market analysis in the sectors with strong SOE presence are defined. They include a type of the economic system, a type of the SOE, its functional dependency on the state agency, structure of the state control over its property.

Practical value. The results of the research, being implemented in the activity of a competition agency, allow providing more accurate market analysis of the grounds and a practice of competition within the markets, as well as within the entire economy.

Keywords: state-owned enterprise (SOE), control, market analysis, standard of market analysis, competition

References.

1. VRU, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2001). Ukrainian Law On the protection of economic competition No. 2210-III dated 11 Jan. 2001. Retrieved from http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2210-14.

2. EC, European Commission Council Regulation (2004). On the Control of Concentrations between Undertakings No. 139/2004 dated 20 Jan. 2004 Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/legislation/regulations.html.

3. Brchet, J.-P., Charreaux, G., Desreumaux, A., & Montmorilon, B. (2015). Lentreprise, son projet, sa gouvernance: lments dune vision partenariale. Economies et Socits. Srie Economie de lEntreprise, 23(1), 33-65. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2614.5766.

4. Lallemand-Kirche, G., Tixier,C., & Piffaut,H. (2017). The Treatment of State-owned Enterprises in EU Competition Law: New Developments and Future Challenges, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 8(5), 295-308, https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpx016.

5. mejkal, V. (2019). Chinese state-owned enterprises and the concept of undertaking under EU competition law. Journal for International and European Law, Economics and Market Integrations, 6(2), 31-51. https://doi.org/10.22598/iele.2019.6.2.2.

6. Kowalski, P., Rabaioli, D., & Vallejo, S. (2017). International Technology Transfer measures in an interconnected world: Lessons and policy implications. OECD Trade Policy Papers, 206, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/ada51ec0-en.

7. McLaughlin, M. (2019). Defining a State-Owned Enterprise in International Investment Agreements. Foreign Investment Law Journal, 34(3), 595-625. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siz011.

8. OECD (2010). State Owned Enterprises and the Principle of Competitive Neutrality: OECD Working Paper DAF/COMP(2009) 37. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/46734249.pdf.

9. IMF, International Monetary Fund (2020). Fiscal Monitor: Policies to Support People During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM/Issues/2020/04/06/fiscal-monitor-april-2020.

10. NARK. The National Assembly of the Republic of Korea (2016). Act on the Management of Public Institutions Act No. 14461, 27 Dec. 2016. Retrieved from https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_service/lawView.do?hseq=41210&lang=ENG.

11. Kowalski, P. (2019). State-owned Enterprises and the Trade Wars. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. Policy Brief, 6. Retrieved from https://www.nupi.no/en/Publications/CRIStin-Pub/State-owned-Enterprises-and-the-Trade-Wars.

12. VRU, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2006). Ukrainian Law On management of state-owned entities No.185-V dated 21. Sep. 2006. Retrieved from http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/185-16.

13. VRU, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2003). Commercial Code of Ukraine No.436-IV dated 16 Jan. 2003 Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/436-15/page3.

14. KM, Kyivskyi Metropoliten (2019). Financial plan of MC Kyivskyi Metropoliten for 2019. E-portal Kyivaudit. Retrieved from https://kyivaudit.gov.ua/pdf/fp/01_01_19/03328913_5_NFP.pdf.

15. Kyivpastrans (2019a). Financial plan of MC Kyivpastrans for 2019. E-portal Kyivaudit. Retrieved from https://kyivaudit.gov.ua/pdf/fp/01_01_19/31725604_5_NFP.pdf.

16. Kyivpastrans (2020). Marks on financial statement of MC Kyivpastrans in 2019. Retrieved from https://kpt.kyiv.ua/uploads/u/1/WaUsDsS0jjxHb_cgBCINTRgEi_3c2g_L.pdf.

17. KSSS, Kyiv State Statistic Service (2019). Passenger traffic in 2018. Retrieved from http://kiev.ukrstat.gov.ua/p.php3?c=1016&lang=1.

18. Kyivpastrans (2019b). Report on management of MC Kyivpastrans in 2018. Retrieved from https://kpt.kyiv.ua/uploads/u/1/xa7z0tCLJog8faMeZk3VxyIiodbE7Q2B.pdf.

• < Prev
• Next >