Науковий вісник НГУ

Industrial potential: assessment, modeling and administration under the condition of sustainable development

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 2

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №6 2020

Last Updated on 22 December 2020

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 1676

Authors:

O.Ye.Kuzmin, orcid.org/0000-0002-6014-6437, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

N.S.Stanasiuk, orcid.org/0000-0002-6885-9431, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

M.Ya.Yastrubskyi, orcid.org/0000-0002-8032-4501, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.Yu.Mohylevska, orcid.org/0000-0001-8482-7950, Kyiv International University, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

V.S.Artiushok, orcid.org/0000-0003-4812-1613, Academician Stepan Demianchuk International University of Economics and Humanities, Rivne, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2020, (6): 128 - 135

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-6/128

Abstract:

Purpose. The world community recognizes the concept of sustainable economic development as the dominant ideology of society in the 21^st century. The aim of the research is to improve the theoretical and methodological as well as methodologically applied principles of economic assessment of the industrial potential development and to work out, on this basis, the conceptual principles of state administration, directed towards its balanced development that will foster the implementation of the sustainable development concept.

Methodology. To reach the aim, we used the systems analysis to develop the system of indexes and evaluation indicators; integral evaluation to determine integral levels of indexes; multivariable correlation-regressive analysis to determine cause-and-effect relations between the factors of the macro environment and levels of development of the industrial potential.

Findings. It is suggested to consider the industrial potential as a multicomponent category through input and output indicators, their outline being the basis for determination of integral levels of reproductive and achieved potentials development. Conceptual bases of the state administration of the balanced development of the industrial potential are formulated, the main idea of which is fulfillment of sustainable industrial development principles due to the achievement of certain levels of the development of the reproductive and achieved potential components. The creation of a favorable macro environment is defined as the main direction of state administration of industrial potential development. It is proposed to use the following indicators to identify the relationship between macro-environmental indicators and result indicators of industrial potential development: development of scientific potential, development of educational potential, development of consumer potential, macroeconomic stability, business environment development, investment activity, labor market development, infrastructure development, demographic situation, ecological stability, level of law and order, and innovation activity. Econometric models of macro environment formation for the balanced development of the industrial potential are worked out. Factors of significant influence on the development level of the reproductive and achieved potentials are identified. The result of implementation of the suggested concept is to achieve a high level of the industrial potential development both at the input stage (the stage of formation) and at the output (stage of implementation) since disbalance gives evidence of an arising problem, unsustainable use of the potential available can result in structure crises.

Originality. The system of indicators of complex economic assessment of industrial potential is substantiated on the conditions of multicomponentity. The proposed methodological approach allows distinguishing two types of industrial potential (reproductive and achieved ones), the balanced interaction of which is the basis of its development, which should be taken into account when developing the conceptual foundations of state management of sustainable development. Aset of models for the formation of a favorable macroenvironment as a result of multicollinear influence of factors with regard to the result indicators of industrial potential development has been developed.

Practical value. These results can be used by practitioners, scientists, government officials in developing a strategy for sustainable industrial development, forming a set of tools for the mechanism of state administration of industrial potential in order to suspend and eliminate negative trends inherent in the current stage of economic development.

Keywords: industrial potential, indicators of evaluation, development, state administration, balanced development

References.

1. Patrick, L., & Tijaja, J. (2017). Global Value Chains and Industrial Policies. Retrieved from http://www.e15initiative.org.

2. Zhalila, A. (2014). Innovative economic development as a component of structural transformation of the economy of Ukraine. Kyiv: NISD. Retrieved from https://niss.gov.ua/publikacii/analitichni-dopovidi/innovaciyniy-rozvitok-promislovosti-yak-skladova-strukturnoi.

3. Onishi, A. (2015). Futures of Global Interdependence (FUGI) Global Modeling System: Integrated Global Model for Sustainable Development. Journal of Policy Modeling, 27(1), 101-135.

4. Marques, A.C., Fuinhas, J.A., & Toms, C. (2019). Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Growth in Industrial Sectors in European Union Countries: A Nonlinear ARDL Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1(2), 20-31.

5. Bogers, M., & West, J. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814-831.

6. Kao, Y.-S., Nawata, K., & Huang, C.-Y. (2019). Systemic functions evaluation based technological innovation system for the sustainability of IoT in the manufacturing industry. Sustainability, 11(8), 2342.

7. Francisco Cleiton da Silva Paiva & Llian Caporlngua Giesta (2019). Socio-environmental management in micro and small industries of Pau dos Ferros-RN. Gestao e Producao, 3(2), 41-45.

8. Park, S.H., & Shin, W.S. (2019). Assessing a social responsibility model for sustainable company growth in the fourth industrial revolution. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 3(2), 41-45.

9. Shpak, N.O., Stanasiuk, N.S., Hlushko, O.V., & Sroka, W. (2018). Assessment of the social and labor components of industrial potential in the context of corporate social responsibility. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17(1), 209-220.

10. Marques, A.C., Fuinhas, J.A., & Toms, C. (2019). Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Growth in Industrial Sectors in European Union Countries: A Nonlinear ARDL Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1(2), 20-31.

11. Lee, H.S., & Choi, Y. (2019). Environmental performance evaluation of the Korean manufacturing industry based on sequential DEA. Sustainability, 11(3), 874.

12. Zhang, X., & Ye, B. (2019). The evaluation of industrial eco-innovation efficiency in China from the perspective of industry heterogeneity. Shengtai Xuebao/Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(14), 5198-5207.

13. Cheng, R., & Li, W. (2019). Evaluating environmental sustainability of an urban industrial plan under the three-line environmental governance policy in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 20(251), 54-67.

14. Bezhentseva, T.V., Aleksandrova, N.N., & Matyus, E.G. (2018). Formation of system of indicators for evaluation of environmental activities. International Conference on Construction, Architecture and Technosphere Safety, (pp.1102-1109). Ghelybinsk, Russian Federation: South Ural State University Ghelybinsk; Russian Federation. Retrieved from http://toc.proceedings.com/47566webtoc.pdf.

15. Stanasiuk, N.S. (2018). Rozvytok promyslovoho potentsialu: ekonomichne otsinyuvannya, prostorovi aspekty ta derzhavne upravlinnya. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoyi politekhniky.

16. State statistics service of Ukraine (2018). Statistical yearbook of Ukraine 2018. Retrieved from https://ukrstat.org/uk/druk/publicat/kat_u/publ1_u.htm.

• < Prev
• Next >