Intellectual potential assessing methodology of an innovation-oriented enterprise
- Details
- Category: Content №4 2024
- Last Updated on 28 August 2024
- Published on 30 November -0001
- Hits: 41
Authors:
H.Y.Ostrovska*, orcid.org/0000-0002-9318-2258, Ternopil Ivan Pul’uj National Technical University, Ternopil, Ukraine, е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
B.G.Shelestovskyi, orcid.org/0000-0002-5606-6290, Ternopil Ivan Pul’uj National Technical University, Ternopil, Ukraine, е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
O.M.Pietukhova, orcid.org/0000-0002-4020-6949, National University of Food Technologies, Kyiv, Ukraine, е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
I.A.Yasinetska, orcid.org/0000-0002-2996-4394, Podillya State Agrarian and Engineering University, Kamianets-Podilskyi, Ukraine, е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
L.S.Tarayevska, orcid.org/0000-0001-7301-0881, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2024, (4): 141 - 148
https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2024-4/141
Abstract:
Purpose. Development and deepening of scientific and methodological foundations, elaboration of practical recommendations in the context of assessing innovation-oriented enterprise employees’ intellectual potential level.
Methodology. The results of scientific research were obtained using general and special methods: inductive logic, deduction, dialectical cognition; economic-statistical and sociological methods; analysis and synthesis; non-parametric modeling; expert-point evaluation; multidimensional scaling.
Findings. We formed a theoretical and methodological platform for evaluating the intellectual potential of innovation-oriented enterprise employees. The fundamental principles of the technology for assessing this potential, which are based on the modern management paradigm, were highlighted. The analysis and evaluation of the intellectual potential of innovation-oriented enterprise employees was carried out on the basis of an expert method using mathematical and statistical tools to ensure the consistency of expert assessments, in particular the Kendall concordance coefficient and the Pearson consistency criterion.
Originality. Our study developed scientific and methodological approach to assessing the level of innovation-oriented enterprise’s employees’ intellectual potential. The main difference between the methodologies was a multi-level assessment: at the professional level – expert assessment of professional qualification potential level significance, taking into account the consistency of expert opinions; at the creative level – expert assessment of creative potential level indicators significance, taking into account the consistency of expert opinions. As a result, taking into account the expert approach, an integral (taxonomic) index was calculated. In general, this makes it possible to increase the effectiveness of innovation-oriented management enterprises’ intellectual potential.
Practical value. The implementation of the proposed methodology makes it possible to solve the managerial problems of identifying potential abilities and opportunities (reserves) of employees, forming study groups, developing training programs, motivating employees to professional and intellectual achievements and demonstrating innovative activity
Keywords: innovative development, assessment principles, intellectual potential, creative potential, professional qualification potential
References.
1. Cherep, O., Cherep, A., Ohrenych, Y., Helman, V., & Gorbunova, A. (2024). Improvement of the management mechanism of the strategy of innovative activities of enterprises. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 1(54), 471-484. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.1.54.2024.4295.
2. Ostrovska, H., Andrushkiv, B., Tsikh, H., Boichyk, I., & Stavnycha, N. (2022). Formation of priorities for the development of intellectual potential in the conditions of establishing a knowledge-based economy. Financial and credit activities: problems of theory and practice, 1(42), 415-427. https://doi.org/10.55643/ fcaptp.1.42.2022.3561.
3. Yakymchuk, A., Valyukh, A., Poliakova, N., Skorohod, I., & Sak, T. (2023). Intellectual economic development: cost and efficiency indicators. Economics, 11(1), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2023-0006.
4. Kobeleva, T., Vytvytska, O., Pererva, P., & Kovalchuk, S. (2022). Strategic management of enterprise development based on intellectual property. Bulletin of the National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute” (economic sciences), 1, 52-57. https://doi.org/10.20998/2519-4461.2022.1.52.
5. Kolot, A. M., & Herasymenko, O. O. (2021). Work XXI: Philosophy of changes, challenges, vectors of development: monograph. Kyiv. KNEU imeni Vadyma Hetʹmana. ISBN 978-966-926-389-6.
6. Alekseieva, К., Turchyn, L., Sobko, O., Boichyk, I., & Stakhurska, S. (2020). Intellectual capital of entrepreneurship: inter connections and ways of stimulating the development. International journal of scientific & technology research, 9(3), 7039-7043.
7. Farzaneh, M., Wilden, R., Afshari, L., & Mehralian, G. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation. Journal of Business Research, 148, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.030.
8. Figueiredo, M., Ferreira, J., & Vrontis, D. (2024). Perspectives on dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity in born-global companies: Theoretical framing, review and research agenda. Journal of International Management, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2023.101099.
9. Kharchuk, T., Purdenko, O., Melnik, V., Shkolenko, O., & Kosmidailo, І. (2023). Conceptual approach to formation of innovative entrepreneurship`s creative potential. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(48), 362-377. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3967.
10. Mazur-Vezhbitskaya, E. (2019). Human resources as a fundamental element that determines the development of innovation. Marketing and Innovation Management, 1, 335-356. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.1-28.
11. Libanova, E. M., Makarova, O. V., & Sarioglo, V. G. (2020). Activation policy as an investment in human capital: theory and practice. Science and Innovation, 16(5), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine16.05.052.
12. Arefieva, O. V., Kovalenko, N. V., & Andriienko, M. M. (2023). Intellectual potential as the main factor of innovative development of an enterprise. Economics Bulletin, 1(81), 157-163. https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/81.157.
13. Butnik-Siverskyi, O. B. (2020). Methodology for estimating the value of intellectual property rights and practical aspects of its application: monograph. Kyiv. Interservis. ISBN 978-966-999-075-4.
14. Ostrovska, H., Tsikh, H., Strutynska, I., Kinash, I., Pietukhova, O., Golovnya, О., & Shehynska, N. (2021). Building an effective model of intelligent entrepreneurship development in digital economy. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(13(114)), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.244916.
15. Glazunova, O., Hurzhii, A., Korolchuk, V., & Voloshyna, T. (2023). Selection of digital tools for organizing students’ group work in distance education. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 94(2), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v94i2.5211.
16. Hrinko, I. (2021). Concordion of exsperts is a guarantee of success in developing of countrys development strategies in industry 4.0. Economy and society, 28, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-28-28.
17. Ostrovska, H. (2022). Intellectual potential structure in the modern paradigm of enterprise management. Social Economics, 63, 41-55. https://doi.org/10.26565/2524-2547-2022-63-04.
Newer news items:
- The labor market as a component of the economic security system of Ukraine - 28/08/2024 03:24
- Ethical and social incentives for the transformation of the business model of enterprise management in conditions of sustainable development - 28/08/2024 03:24
- Innovative approaches to personnel security under the conditions of martial law - 28/08/2024 03:24
- The model of economic cooperation systems in the context of implementation of the “One Belt One Road” initiative - 28/08/2024 03:24
- Ukraine’s policy on brain drain in the wartime and post-war periods - 28/08/2024 03:24
Older news items:
- Research on stochastic properties of time series data on chemical analysis of cast iron - 28/08/2024 03:24
- On the issue of load’s external ballistics under low-speed transportation - 28/08/2024 03:24
- Designing the predictive control of a drum dryer using multi-agent technology - 28/08/2024 03:24
- Cumulative triangle for visual analysis of empirical data - 28/08/2024 03:24
- The right to a safe environment: economic and legal guarantees of provision in Ukraine - 28/08/2024 03:23
- Floristic and ecological structure of the landfill vegetation in the Western Forest Steppe of Ukraine - 28/08/2024 03:23
- The effect of petroleum products pollution on environmental soil condition at airport adjacent territory - 28/08/2024 03:23
- Features of the assessment of occupational risks under hazardous working conditions - 28/08/2024 03:23
- Environmental toxicity assessment of mining waste from an abandoned Zn-Pb mine - 28/08/2024 03:23
- Application of modern mathematical apparatus for determining the dynamic properties of vehicles - 28/08/2024 03:23