The impact of economic shadowing on social development: challenges for macroeconomic stability
/ 0
- Details
- Category: Content №1 2022
- Last Updated on 25 February 2022
- Published on 30 November -0001
- Hits: 4215
Authors:
I.V.Tiutiunyk, orcid.org/0000-0001-5883-2940, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine, e-mail:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
A.O.Zolkover, orcid.org/0000-0002-8176-1850, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
S.V.Lyeonov, orcid.org/0000-0001-5639-3008, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine, e-mail:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
L.B.Ryabushka, orcid.org/0000-0001-8597-6819, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine, e-mail:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2022, (1): 183 - 191
https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-1/183
Abstract:
Purpose. To develop a model of investigating the link between the level of shadow economy and indicators of social development of the country.
Methodology. The study of the relationship between the analyzed indicators was conducted using general and special research methods. The established hypotheses were tested using VAR/VEC modeling. Dickey-Fuller test, the Phillips-Perron test, Joansen test are used in the work.
Findings. The paper identifies the risks of the shadow economy for social indicators of macroeconomic stability. Based on the analysis of the countrys social development indicators, indicators were identified that are most sensitive to changes in the level of the shadow economy which are: Gini coefficient, average income ratio of 10% of the richest to 10% of the poorest, average income ratio of 20% of the richest to 20% of the poorest sections of the population, Human Development Index, gross average wage. The EU countries and Ukraine are identified as the statistical base of the study and the assessment period is 20052020. The results of modeling proved the relationship between the level of shadow economy and indicator of social development.
Originality. The approach to assessing the relationship between the level of the shadow economy and indicators of social development of the country by considering the indicators that most fully characterize the level of social protection and material well-being of the population has been improved.
Practical value. The scientific contribution of the paper is that existing research on the impact of shadow economy on the level of social development of the countries remains fragmented, as well as studies assessing its effect on the macroeconomic stability. The impulse response function constructed by the authors may provide some insight into better understanding of the indicators of social development, the most sensitive to the shadow economy shocks. The results of estimation can be used for practical or scientific purposes.
Keywords: shadow economy, macroeconomic stability, social development, economic development, cointegration
References.
1. Katrechka, A., & Dahlberg, S. (2014). The effect of the shadow economy on social development. A comparative study on advanced and least developed countries. (Masters Thesis, University of Gothenburg).
2. Amendola, A., & DellAnno, R. (2010). Institutions and Human development in the Latin America shadow economy. Estudios En Derecho Y Gobierno, 9-24.
3. World Development Indicators (n.d.). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator?tab=all.
4. Vorontsova, A., Vasylieva, T., Bilan, Y., Ostasz, G., & Mayboroda,T. (2020). The influence of state regulation of education for achieving the sustainable development goals: Case study of central and eastern european countries. Administratie Si Management Public, 2020(34), 6-26. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2020.34-01.
5. Juarez-Garcia, M.I. (2020). Personal Corruption & Corrupting Laws: Montesquieus Twofold Theory of Corruption. Business Ethics and Leadership, 4(4), 76-83.https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.4(4).76-83.2020.
6. Vasileva, T.A., & Lasukova, A.S. (2013). Empirical study on the correlation of corporate social responsibility with the banks efficiency and stability. Corporate Ownership and Control, 10(4 A), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i4art7.
7. Smiianov, V.A., Vasilyeva, T.A., Chygryn, O.Y., Rubanov, P.M., & Mayboroda, T.M. (2020). Socio-economic patterns of labor market functioning in the public health: challenges connected with COVID-19. Wiadomosci Lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland: 1960), 73(10), 2181-2187. https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202010114.
8. Kobushko, I., Tiutiunyk, I., Kobushko, I., Starinskyi, M., & Zavalna, Z. (2021). The triadic approach to cash management: Communication, advocacy, and legal aspects. Estudios De Economia Aplicada, 39(7). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i7.5071.
9. Tsalikis, J. (2018). Can We Act Ethically? Implications of Determinism, Chaos Theory and Unintended Consequences. Business Ethics and Leadership, 2(2), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.2(2).6-13.2018.
10.Yoshimori, M. (2019). Shadow Exchange Rates Changing the Winds with Headwinds and Tailwinds.SocioEconomic Challenges, 3(2), 78-88.https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.3(2).78-88.2019.
11. Vasilyeva, T., Kryklii, O., & Shilimbetova, G. (2019). The creative industry as a factor in the development of the economy: Dissemination of European experience in the countries with economies in transition. Creativity Studies, 12(1), 75-101. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2019.7453.
12. Kuzmenko, O., Vasylieva, T., Vojtovi, S., Chygryn, O., & Snieka,V. (2020). Why do regions differ in vulnerability to ovid-19? Spatial nonlinear modeling of social and economic patterns. Economics and Sociology, 13(4), 318-340. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-4/20.
13. Vasylieva, T., Machov, V., Vysochyna, A., Podgrska, J., & Samusevych, Y. (2020). Setting up architecture for environmental tax system under certain socioeconomic conditions. Journal of International Studies, 13(4), 273-285. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-4/19.
14. Trifu, A. (2018). Defending and Modelling Europe: The Visegrad Group Experience.SocioEconomic Challenges, 2(2), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.2(2).13-18.2018.
15. Vasylieva, T., Jurgilewicz, O., Poliakh, S., Tvaronaviien, M., & Hydzik, P. (2020). Problems of measuring countrys financial security. Journal of International Studies, 13(2), 329-346. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-2/22.
16. Brychko, M., Savchenko, T., Vasylieva, T., & Piotrowski, P. (2021). Illegal activities of financial intermediaries: A burden of trust crisis. Journal of International Studies, 14(1), 172-189. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2021/14-1/12.
17. Poliakh, S., & Alikariyev, N. (2017). Evaluation Quality of Consumer Protection by Financial Markets Services. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 1(3), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.1(3).75-81.2017.
18. Bouchetara, M., Nassour, A., & Eyih, S. (2020). Macroprudential policy and financial stability, role and tools. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(4), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.4(4).45-54.2020.