Науковий вісник НГУ

The relationship between the development of a safety culture and the implementation of safety requirements in organisations

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №6 2024

Last Updated on 28 December 2024

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 170

Authors:

V.A.Tsopa, orcid.org/0000-0002-4811-3712, International Institute of Management, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

S.I.Cheberiachko, orcid.org/0000-0003-3281-7157, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.O.Yavorska*, orcid.org/0000-0001-5516-5310, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.V.Deryugin, orcid.org/0000-0002-2456-7664, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

A.A.Aleksieiev, orcid.org/0000-0003-0394-2493, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2024, (6): 101 - 108

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2024-6/101

Abstract:

Purpose. To establish the relationship between the development of a safety culture in an organisation and the fulfilment of occupational safety requirements.

Methodology. To solve the tasks set, we use the method of scientific synthesis, which allows us to obtain new knowledge as a result of combining previously dismembered parts of the subject into a single whole, to determine mutual expectations in occupational health and safety (OHS) management systems (MS).

Findings. It is proposed to determine the level of safety culture of an organisation on the basis of five stages: indifference, reaction, dependence, independence, interdependence, which characterises a change in the awareness of employees of the organization to fulfil the requirements for OHS of employees. A process for determining the level of safety culture is proposed by identifying the attitude to the fulfilment of OHS requirements by an OHS specialist, a manager of a unit (organisation), employees’ self-awareness and mutual assistance of employees to fulfil OHS requirements. The coefficient of fulfilment of the requirements for OHS of employees in a conditional unit was calculated, which allows determining the stage of development of safety culture and the contribution of each employee to the development of safety culture. A distribution of preventive measures to improve OHS level, based on the level of development of safety culture, is proposed.

Originality. The relationship is identified between the coefficient of compliance with occupational safety requirements and employee health and the stages of development of safety culture, taking into account the impact on employee compliance from managers of a units, OHS specialists, self-awareness and mutual assistance through weighting coefficients.

Practical value. Recommendations are developed to increase the effectiveness of OHS MS by strengthening the implementation of OHS requirements by changing their attitude to OHS issues, by introducing preventive measures in accordance with the development of safety culture.

Keywords: risk, safety culture, occupational injuries, management decisions

References.

1. Lu, X., & Wang, J. (2018). A Review of the Classification of Enterprise Life Cycle. Modern Economy, 9, 1169-1178. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2018.97076.

2. Matyushenko, O. I. (2010). Enterprise Life Cycle: Essence, Models, Estimation. The Problems of Economy, 4, 82-91.

3. Jabłoński, A., & Jabłoński, M. (2016). Research on Business Models in their Life Cycle. Sustainability, 8(5), 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050430.

4. Bazaluk, O., Tsopa, V., Okrasa, M., Pavlychenko, A., Cheberiachko, S., Yavorska, O., Deryugin, O., & Lozynskyi, V. (2023). Improvement of the occupational risk management process in the work safety system of the enterprise. Frontiers Public Health, 11, 1330430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1330430.

5. Kabachenko, D. V. (2017). Management decision taking under uncertainty and risk. Economic Bulletin of Dnipro University of Technology, 2(58), 107-115.

6. Han, L., Liu, J., Evans, R., Song, Y., & Ma, J. (2020). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Health Information Standards in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review Based on Best Fit Framework Synthesis. JMIR Medical Informatics, 15, 8(5), e17334. https://doi.org/10.2196/17334.

7. Wu, X., & Wang, S. (2022). Assessment of Enterprise Life Cycle Based on Two-Stage Logistic Model: Exemplified by China’s Automobile Manufacturing Enterprises. Sustainability, 14(21), 14437. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114437.

8. Bernard, B. (2018). A Safety Culture Maturity Matrix for Nuclear Regulatory Bodies. Safety, 4, 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety4040044.

9. Abeje, M., & Luo, F. (2023). The Influence of Safety Culture and Climate on Safety Performance: Mediating Role of Employee Engagement in Manufacturing Enterprises in Ethiopia. Sustainability, 15, 11274. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411274.

10. Bazaluk, O., Pavlychenko, A., Yavorska, O., Nesterova, O., Tsopa, V., Cheberiachko, S., Deryugin, O., & Lozynskyi, V. (2024). Improving the risk management process in quality management systems of higher education. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 3977. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53455-9.

11. Corbey, M., Roon, F. A., & Hinfelaar, S. (2019). Company life cycle models and business valuation. Maandblad Voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie, 93(9/10), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.5117/mab.93.37561.

12. Piwowar-Sulej, K. (2020). Pro-Environmental Organizational Culture: Its Essence and a Concept for Its Operationalization. Sustainability, 12, 4197. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104197.

13. Syed-Yahya, S. N. N., Idris, M. A., & Noblet, A. J. (2022). The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: A review. Journal of Safety Research, 83, 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.08.008.

14. Han, B., Son, S., & Kim, S. (2021). Measuring Safety Climate in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 13, 10603. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910603.

15. Han, H. (2022). The Utility of Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Educational Assessment: Performance Prediction. Mathematics, 10, 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10091493.

16. van Nunen, K., Reniers, G., & Ponnet, K. (2022). Measuring Safety Culture Using an Integrative Approach: The Development of a Comprehensive Conceptual Framework and an Applied Safety Culture Assessment Instrument. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13602. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013602.

17. Cucculelli, M., & Peruzzi, V. (2020). Innovation over the industry life-cycle. Does ownership matter? Research Policy, 49(1), 103878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103878.

18. Saleem, F., & Malik, M. I. (2022). Safety Management and Safety Performance Nexus: Role of Safety Consciousness, Safety Climate, and Responsible Leadership. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13686. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013686.

19. Fastrich, G. M., & Murayama, K. (2020). Development of Interest and Role of Choice During Sequential Knowledge Acquisition. AERA Open, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420929981.

20. Vleugels, W., Verbruggen, M., De Cooman, R., & Billsberry, J. (2023). A systematic review of temporal person-environment fit research: Trends, developments, obstacles, and opportunities for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(2), 376-398. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2607.

21. Dwivedula, R., Bredillet, C., & Müller, R. (2018). Work Motivation in Temporary Organizations: Establishing Theoretical Corpus. Management and Organizational Studies, 5(3), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.5430/mos.v5n3p29.

22. Serdiuk, О. О., & Bazyma, В. О. (2021). Adaptation of the five-factor BFI-10 personality screening questionnaire and testing of its diagnostic properties on the example of drug users. Law and Safety, 83(4), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2021.4.10.

23. Han, L., Liu, J., Evans, R., Song, Y., & Ma, J. (2020). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Health Information Standards in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review Based on Best Fit Framework Synthesis. JMIR Medical Informatics, 15, 8(5), e17334. https://doi.org/10.2196/17334.

24. Saleem, F., & Malik, M. I. (2022). Safety Management and Safety Performance Nexus: Role of Safety Consciousness, Safety Climate, and Responsible Leadership. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13686. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013686.

25. Kunodzia, R., Bikitsha, L. S., & Haldenwang, R. (2024). Perceived Factors Affecting the Implementation of Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems in the South African Construction Industry. Safety, 10(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety10010005.

26. Cheberiachko, S., Yavorska, O., Deryugin, O., Lantukh, D., Bas, I., Kruzhilko, O., & Melnyk, V. (2023). Improving Safety of Passenger Road Transportation. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 14(2), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.5507/tots.2023.003.

27. Trinh, M. T., & Feng, Y. (2022). A Maturity Model for Resilient Safety Culture Development in Construction Companies. Buildings, 12(6), 733. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060733.

28. Hossain, H., & Kader, M. A. (2020). An Analysis on BCG Growth Sharing Matrix. International Journal of Contemporary Research and Review, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.15520/ijcrr.v11i10.848.

29. de Sousa, I. M. O., Kaczam, F., Dalazen, L. L., Lucena, W. G. L., da Silva, W. V., & da Veiga, C. P. (2024). The dynamics of the life cycle theory and organizational culture: a systematic literature review. SN Business & Economics, 4, 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00612-3.

30. Karim, R., Mamun, M. A. A., & Kamruzzaman, A. S. M. (2024). Cash conversion cycle and financial performance: evidence from manufacturing firms of Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 8(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-03-2022-0033.

• < Prev
• Next >