Improvement of the safe work system

User Rating:  / 1
PoorBest 

Authors:


V.A.Tsopa, orcid.org/0000-0002-4811-3712, International Institute of Management, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

S.I.Cheberiachko, orcid.org/0000-0003-3281-7157, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.O.Yavorska*, orcid.org/0000-0001-5516-5310, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.V.Deryugin, orcid.org/0000-0002-2456-7664, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

A.A.Aleksieiev, orcid.org/0000-0003-0394-2493, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


повний текст / full article



Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2022, (6): 104 - 111

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-6/104



Abstract:



Purpose.
To improve the approach to the development of a safe work system, one of the important elements of the occupational health and safety management system (OHSMS) of employees at an enterprise.


Methodology.
The research is based on the Safe Systems of Work, which combines the content of safe procedures, which are determined taking into account the content of the workers production task when performing production activities, his/her competence in understanding the technological process and characteristics involved technological equipment.


Findings.
To reduce occupational diseases and industrial injuries at enterprises, it is proposed to implement the Safe Systems of Work (SSW) of 5 steps: analyse, summarize, anticipate, support, improve, which will make it possible to identify occupational risks (OR) and justify the feasibility of reducing their impact on the worker during the performance of production activities. For the implementation of each step, a corresponding procedure is provided, which allows ensuring their implementation. It is proposed to carry out the OR evaluation procedure according to the Tree Trunk Analysis model, which is a section of the trunk of a tree divided into six parts which characterize the dangerous factors that affect the activity of the employee, the functioning of the technological equipment and the environment. A feature of the proposed approach is the establishment of zones of interaction between the following components of the proposed SSW: the worker and technological equipment, the worker and the environment, as well as the environment and technological equipment, which characterize the specified external and internal factors of influence on the SSW.


Originality.
The approach to the organization of SSW to reduce the level of OR during the performance of production activities has been improved based on the improvement of the OR management process, the identification of external and internal dangerous factors that affect the level of OR, the probability of the occurrence of a dangerous event and its degree of severity, taking into account changes, over time, in the conditions of performing professional activities: during stable work, during an emergency situation, during an accident and during martial law.


Practical value.
Improved labour protection instructions or maps of safe production processes can be applied at enterprises with the aim of better perception by employees of labour safety requirements and improvement of document flow at the workplace.



Keywords:
safe work system, occupational risk, hazard, accident, hazardous factors

References.


1. Lis, T., & Nowacki, K. (2019). Modern Trends in Occupational Safety Management. New Trends in Production Engineering, 2(2) 126-138. https://doi.org/10.2478/ntpe-2019-0078.

2. Amyotte, P.R., & Lupien, C.S. (2017). Chapter Three - Elements of Process Safety Management. Methods in Chemical Process Safety, 1, 87-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mcps.2017.01.004.

3. Megawati, Arifuddin, R., & Abdurahman, M.A. (2019). Study of Influential Factors in Applying Occupational Health and Safety Management System on Construction Project (Case Study: Vida View Makassar Apartment). International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(4s), 33-37.

4. Rae, A., & Provan, D. (2019). Safety work versus the safety of work. Safety Science, 111, 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.001.

5. Sorensen, G., Dennerlein, J.T., Peters, S.E., Sabbath, E.L., Kelly,E.L., & Wagner, G.R. (2021). The future of research on work, safety, health and wellbeing: A guiding conceptual framework. Social Science & Medicine, 269, 113593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113593.

6. Li, Ch., Tang, T., Chatzimichailidou, M.M., Gyuchan, T.J., & Waterson,P.A. (2019). Hybrid human and organisational analysis method for railway accidents based on STAMP-HFACS and human information processing. Applied Ergonomics, 79, 122-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.12.011.

7. Standard ISO 45001:2018 Occupational health and safety management systems Requirements with guidance for use (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:45001:ed-1:v1:en.

8. Standard ISO 31000 Risk management (2020). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/iso-31000-risk-management.html.

9. Karkoszka, T. (2017). Operational monitoring in the technological process in the aspect of occupational risk. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1463-1469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.192.

10. Skad, A. (2019). Assessing the impact of processes on the Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems effectiveness using the fuzzy cognitive maps approach. Safety Science, 117, 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.03.021.

11. Tsopa, V., Cheberiachko, S., Yavorska, O., Deryugin, O., & Bas,I. (2022). Increasing the safety of the transport process by minimizing the professional risk of a dump truck driver. Mining of mineral deposits, 16(3), 101-108. https://doi.org/10.33271/mining16.03.101.

12. Kruzhilko, O., Volodchenkova, N., Maystrenko, V., Feshchenko,A., & Yeremenko, S. (2021). Mathematical modelling of professional risk at Ukrainian metallurgical industry enterprises. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 108(1), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.4797.

13. Purpura, P.P. (2019). Safety in the Workplace. Security and Loss Prevention (Seventh Edition), 435-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811795-8.00014-X.

14. Anaya-Aguilar, R., Surez-Cebador, M., Rubio-Romero, J.C., & Galindo-Reyes, F. (2018). Delphi assessment of occupational hazards in the wineries of Andalusia, in southern Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 297-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.008.

15. al, S., & Bykaknc, B.Y. (2019). Occupational health and safety management systems applications and a system planning model. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 1058-1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.147.

16. Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Boiral, O., Arana, G., & Allur, E. (2019). OHSAS 18001 certification and work accidents: Shedding light on the connection. Journal of Safety Research, 68, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2018.11.003.

17. Kalkis, H., & Roja, Z. (2016). Strategic Model for Ergonomics Implementation in Operations Management. Journal of Ergonomics, 6(4), 1000173. https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7556.1000173.

18. Village, J., Greig, M., Salustri, F., Zolfaghari, S., & Neumann,W.P. (2014). An ergonomics action research demonstration: integrating human factors into assembly design processes. Ergonomics, 57(10), 1574-1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.938128.

19. Cheberiachko, S., Yavorska, ., Yavorskyi, A., Naumov, M., & Ikonnikov, M. (2020). Development of safety work system at mining enterprises. The ollection of Research Papers of the National Mining University, 61, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.33271/crpnmu/61.037.

20. Poplin, G.S., Pollack, K.M., Griffin, S., Day-Nash, V., Peate,W.F., Nied, E., Gulotta, J., & Burgess, J.L. (2015). Establishing a proactive safety and health risk management system in the fire service. BMC Public Health, 15, 407. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1675-8.

 

Visitors

7559346
Today
This Month
All days
3767
81832
7559346

Guest Book

If you have questions, comments or suggestions, you can write them in our "Guest Book"

Registration data

ISSN (print) 2071-2227,
ISSN (online) 2223-2362.
Journal was registered by Ministry of Justice of Ukraine.
Registration number КВ No.17742-6592PR dated April 27, 2011.

Contacts

D.Yavornytskyi ave.,19, pavilion 3, room 24-а, Dnipro, 49005
Tel.: +38 (056) 746 32 79.
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
You are here: Home Publication ethics EngCat Archive 2022 Content №6 2022 Improvement of the safe work system