Application of logistic concept for the organization of small academic groups training in higher education institutions
/ 0
- Details
- Category: Content №2 2022
- Last Updated on 30 April 2022
- Published on 30 November -0001
- Hits: 4114
Authors:
M.B.Litvinova, orcid.org/0000-0002-4917-2132, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding, Kherson Educational-Scientific Institute, Kherson, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
O.M.Dudchenko, orcid.org/0000-0002-7724-0892, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding, Kherson Educational-Scientific Institute, Kherson, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
O.D.Shtanko, orcid.org/0000-0003-3572-7915, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding, Kherson Educational-Scientific Institute, Kherson, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2022, (2): 174 - 179
https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-2/174
Abstract:
Purpose. From the standpoint of educational logistics, we consider organization of training of small academic groups (SAG) in higher education institutions (HEIs). We consider separate components of the logistics system of HEIs and features of resource, information and service streams for maintenance of training of SAG. We substantiate the expediency of organizing student training in the SAG to meet regional staffing needs.
Methodology. In our study, we use system-structural methods (including systems analysis, generalization, research-targeted generalization and systematization of economic, statistical, and scientific-methodological data) as well as the logistical approach. To substantiate the results, we conduct a sociological survey using the statistical data processing based on multicomponent correlation analysis.
Findings. The institution of higher education is considered as a logistics system consisting of numerous interconnected links that require the use of information, resource and service flows adapted to educational conditions. For flow management, the use of logistics technologies is proposed, which are combined in the Learning and Development (L&D) model, which has four components. The authors provide a detailed review of these components with highlights on their functional aspects that aim to ensure an economically, organizationally and methodologically sound joint SAG training for students from different specializations. The data is provided testifying to expediency of carrying out training of experts in HEIs of that region where there is a need for these experts, even in spite of bigger cost of training of SAG students.
Originality. For the first time, a logistical concept was used to consider the organization of SAG training in the HEIs. The application of the L&D model for logistics system flow management has been improved, as well as the contaminated form of training and diversification of subject content, which ensure the quality of the service flow during the joint training of students of different specialties.
Practical value. The application of the logistics concept for the organization of SAG training in HEIs allows one, on the one hand, to optimally realize the state interests in regional staffing, and on the other to increase the stability of HEIs in a rapidly changing market economy.
Keywords: educational logistics, higher education institution, logistics concept, small academic group
References.
1.Regulatory framework of Ukraine (2016). Retrieved from https://kneu.edu.ua/ua/Information_for/professors/norm_doc/norm_baza_ukr/.
2. Education and training that meets the needs of small business. A systematic review of research (2017). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED499699.pdf.
3. Beynaghi, A., Trencher, G., Moztarzadeh, F., Mozafari, M., Maknoon, R., & Filho, W.L. (2016). Future sustainability scenarios for universities: Moving beyond the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development.Journal of Cleaner Production,112, 3464-3478.
4.Lomonosov, A.V., & Lomonosova, O.E. (2016). The amount of small-scale training at the technical universities in Ukraine. conomic scope, 112, 196-203.
5.Novikov, V.M., Lomonosov, A.V., & Lomonosova, O.E. (2017). The System of Regulation of Academic Staff Workload at Higher Education Institutions of Ukraine in Conditions of Limited Funding. rsn, 20(3), 119-134.
6. Morien, R.I. (2019). Leagility in Pedagogy: Applying Logistics and Supply Chain Management Thinking to Higher Education, Teacher Education in the 21st Century, Reginald Botshabeng Monyai, IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85264.
7. Lukman, R.K., Omahne, V., Sheikh, L.T., & Glavic, P. (2021). Integrating Sustainability into Logistics Oriented Education in Europe. Sustainability, 13(4), 1667. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041667.
8. Thurer, M., Tomaevi, I., Stevenson, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2018). A systematic review of the literature on integrating sustainability into engineering curricula.Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 608-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.130.
9. Dallasega, P., Woschank, M., Ramingwong, S., Tippayawong,K.Y., & Chonsawat, N. (2019). Field study to identify requirements for smart logistics of European, US and Asian SMEs. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Bangkok, Thailand, March 5-7, 2019, 844-855. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331861241_Field_study_to_identify_requirements_for_smart_logistics_of_European_US_and_Asian_SMEs.
10. Oger, R., Bnaben, F., Lauras, M., & Montreuil, B. (2018). Towards Decision Support Automation for Supply Chain Risk Management among Logistics Network Stakeholders. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11),1505-1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.287.
11. Kim, C., & Shin, W.S. (2019). Does Information from the Higher Education and R&D Institutes Improve the Innovation Efficiency of Logistic Firms? The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 35(1),70-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.03.010.
12. Galankashi, M., Rahiminezhad, H., & Ahmad, S. (2016). Assessment of hybrid Lean-Agile (Leagile) supply chain strategies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 27(4), 470-482. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2015-0069.
13. Stadnyy, Ye.E. (2018). Movement of entrants between regions of Ukraine: comparison of 2017 and 2018. CEDOS think tank. Retrieved from https://cedos.org.ua/uk/articles/rukh-abituriientok-ta-abituriientiv-mizh-oblastiamy-ukrainy-porivniannia-2017-ta-2018-rokiv.
14. Hodge, S., Smith, ., & Barratt-Pugh, L. (2016). Towards a Model of Learning and Development Practice. International Journal of HRD Practice, Policy and Research, 1(2),7-25. https://doi.org/ 10.22324/ijhrdppr.1.113.
15. Litvinova, M.B., & Shtanko, O.D. (2020).Using the L&D model in information support of educational process in Technical University. Engineering and Educational Technologies, 8(3),45-57. https://doi.org/10.30929/2307-9770.2020.08.03.04.
16. Bondarchuk, E.V. (2018). Communication of motivation and academic performance of students of institutions of higher and secondary special education. Scientific works of the Republican Institute of Higher Education: Psychological Sciences, Minsk, 18(2), 40-48. Retrieved from http://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/208694.
17. Petchko, . (2018). How to Write About Economics and Public Policy: Multiple Regression Analysis. Tokyo: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-04062-7.
18. Alieksieieva, S. (2016). The didactic going of contamination, intensification of maintenance and to complement of forms, methods, reception of preparation of future designers is near development professional career. Art Education: Content, Technologies, Management, (11), 121-133. Retrieved from https://zbirnik.mixmd.edu.ua/artedu/article/view/102.
19. Chocholac, J., Sommerauerova, D., Svab, M., Jiraskova, A., & Polak, M. (2021). Logistic Technologies for Tracking Manufactured Passenger Cars on Consolidation Areas: Interpretative Case Study. Transportation Research Procedia, 53, 266-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.02.034.