Articles

The effect of petroleum products pollution on environmental soil condition at airport adjacent territory

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №4 2024

Last Updated on 28 August 2024

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 36

Authors:

L.Cherniak*, orcid.org/0000-0003-4192-3955, National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.Shevchenko, orcid.org/0000-0003-2933-8251, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

T.Maniecki, orcid.org/0000-0002-7687-7250, Lodz University of Technology, Lodz, Republic of Poland, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.Mikhyeyev, orcid.org/0000-0003-4069-3625, National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.Shtyka, orcid.org/0000-0001-9593-8971, Lodz University of Technology, Lodz, Republic of Poland, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

R.Ciesielski, orcid.org/0000-0002-0720-6875, Lodz University of Technology, Lodz, Republic of Poland

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2024, (4): 092 - 098

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2024-4/092

Abstract:

Purpose. Determination of the impact of oil pollution at the territory adjacent to the airport on the ecological state of the soil.

Methodology. The authors evaluate the impact of petroleum products on the ecological conditions of the soil at the territory adjacent to the airport. In particular, it was done experimentally, using the method of biotesting of soil sample data. Also, the component composition of chemical soil pollution was analyzed applying chromatographic analysis. Using the method of mathematical modeling, a two-factor model was built taking into account the factor of “content of oil products (X1)” in the soil and “distance from the runway (X2)” to describe the impact of air transport processes on the condition of the soil at the territory adjacent to airports.

Findings. Based on the obtained experimental data, the level of soil pollution at the territory adjacent to the airport was determined. It was established that for two soil samples, taken at a distance of 50 and 500 m from the runway of the airport, the content of oil products is below the established approximately permissible concentration. For samples taken at distances of 1,000, 1,500 and 2,000 m, an excess was established. The results of the chromatographic analysis of the composition of chemical contamination of the soil indicated a significant amount of hydrocarbons characteristic of the fuel fractions of oil. The obtained results demonstrate the dependence of the level of soil contamination with petroleum products on the distance to the runway and the presence of technogenic influence of this enterprise on the ecological state of the soil, which was confirmed with the results of biotesting of these soil samples. A two-factor model was built taking into account the factors of “content of petroleum products (X1)” in the soil and “distance from the runway (X2)” and their influence on soil phytotoxicity. The adequacy of the proposed model is evidenced by the coefficient of determination R² = 0.9153 for the tested soil samples.

Originality. The results of the experimental studies show that chemical pollution negatively affects the ecological condition of the soil at the territory adjacent to the airport; has a multi-component composition, and, in addition to hydrocarbons, which are characterize petroleum products used for refueling and operating vehicles, there are products of decomposition and aging of polymers, components of additives. The dependence of the ecological state of the soil on the technologically loaded territory adjacent to the airport on the level of petroleum products pollution and on the distance to the airport runway was determined. To find out the significance of the impact on the level of phytotoxicity of the soil of each of the two factors (the content of petroleum products and the distance from the runway), a multifactor statistical analysis of the obtained data was carried out and a two-factor model was built. This made it possible to establish that the contribution of the factor X1 (content of oil products) to the change in the soil phytotoxicity indicator is significantly greater than the contribution of the factor X2 (distance from the airport).

Practical value. Based on the results of the analysis of the obtained experimental data, a two-factor model is proposed, which takes into account the factors X1 and X2 and can be used for further studies of the impact of air transport processes on the state of the soil at the areas near airports.

Keywords: petroleum products, soil, chemical pollution, environmental condition, environmental safety, airport

References.

1. Ray, Sh., Killare, P. S., & Kim, K.-H. (2012). The Effect of Aircraft Traffic Emission on the Soil Surface Contamination Analysis around the International Airport in Delhi, India. Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment, 6-2, 118-126. https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2012.6.2.118.

2. Cherniak, L., Madzhd, S., Lapan, O., Dmytrukha, T., & Korniienko, I. (2021). Usage of plant test systems for determination of phytotoxicity of contaminated with petroleum products soil. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 22(6), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/137363.

3. Latysheva, O. V. (2015). Determining the negative impact of the airport‘s activities on the environment and developing measures to reduce it. Economic analysis, 15(3), 57-63.

4. Masiol, M., & Harrison, R. M. (2014). Aircraft engine exhaust emissions and other airportrelated contributions to ambient air pollution: A review. Atmosphere Environment, 95, 409-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.070.

5. Hsu, H.-H., Adamkiewicz, G., Houseman, E. A., Zarubiak, D., Spengler, J. D., & Levy, J. I. (2013). Contributions of aircraft arrivals and departures to ultrafine particle counts near Los Angeles International Airport. Science of The Total Environment, 444, 347-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.010.

6. Chung, C. S., Lane, K. J., Black-Ingersoll, F., Kolaczyk, E., Schollaert, C., Li, S., Simon, M. C., & Levy, J. I. (2023). Assessing the impact of aircraft arrival on ambient ultrafine particle number concentrations in near-airport communities in Boston, Massachusetts. Environmental Research, 225:115584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115584.

7. Shpak, O. M., Havryliuk, R. B., Lohvynenko, O. I., & Zapolskyi, I. M. (2023). Assessment of the impact of fluctuations in the level of groundwater on the transformation of oil pollution of the underground environment. Heolohichnyi zhurnal, 2, 40-57. https://doi.org/10.30836/igs.1025-6814.2023.2.273586.

8. Horobtsov, I., Cherniak, L., Radomska, M., Tykhenko, O., & Synylo, K. (2023). Development of a cognitive model for the analysis of relationships in the airport environmental management system. Ecological Safety and Balanced Use of Resources, 14(2), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.69628/esbur/2.2023.09.

9. Radomska, M. M., Madzhd, S. M., Cherniak, L. M., & Mikhye­yev, O. M. (2020). Environmental pollution in the airport impact area–case study of the Boryspil international airport. Ecologycal Problems, 2(5), 76-82. https://doi.org/10.23939/ep2020.02.076.

10. Nunes, L. M., Zhu, Y.-G., Stigter, T. Y., Monteiroa, J. P., & Teixeira, M. R. (2011). Environmental impacts on soil and groundwater at airports: origin, contaminants of concern and environmental risks. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 13, 3026-3039. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1em10458f.

11. Sulej, A. M., Żaneta Polkowska, Z., & Namieśnik, J. (2022). Contamination of Runoff Water at Gdańsk Airport (Poland) by Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs). Sensors,  2011, 11(12), 11901-11920. https://doi.org/10.3390/s111211901.

12. Stacey, B. (2019). Measurement of ultrafine particles at airports: A review. Atmospheric Environment, 198, 463-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.041.

13. Bendtsen, K. M., Bengtsen, E., Saber, A. T., & Vogel, U. (2021). A review of health effects associated with exposure to jet engine emissions in and around airports. Environmental Health, 20(10), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-020-00690-y.

14. Masiol, M., & Harrison, R. M. (2014). Aircraft engine exhaust emissions and other airportrelated contributions to ambient air pollution: A review. Atmospheric Environment, 95, 409-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.070.

15. Hsu, H.-H., Adamkiewicz, G., Houseman, E. A., Zarubiak, D., Spengler, J. D., & Levy, J. I. (2013). Contributions of aircraft arrivals and departures to ultrafine particle counts near Los Angeles International Airport. Science of the Total Environment, 444, 347-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.010.

16. Chernyshenko, H. O. (2011). Environmental toxicology and its place in the system of training environmental specialists. Man and environment. Problems of neoecology, (3-4), 154-158.

17. Trofimov, I., Boichenko, S., Tykhenko, O., & Shkilniuk, I. (2018). Estimation of fitotoxicity of mixed aviation fuels with application of plant testers. Power engineering: economics, technique, ecology, 2, 120-129. https://doi.org/10.20535/1813-5420.2.2018.147375.

18. Radomska, M. M., Madzhd, S. M., Cherniak, L. M., & Mikhyeyev, O. M. (2020). Environmental pollution in the airport impact area–case study of the Boryspil international airport. Environmental Problems, 2(5), 76-82. https://doi.org/10.23939/ep2020.02.076.

19. Hroza, V. A., Madzhd, S. M., & Franchuk, H. M. (2010). Ecological state of the soil cover in the area of operation and repair of aviation equipment. Environmental safety and nature use, 1, 56-66.

20. GOST 17.4.3.01-81. Nature protection. Soils General requirements for sampling. Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ru/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=82358.

21. Soils. Methodology for measuring the mass fraction of petroleum products by the gravimetric method: MVV No. 081/12-0116-03 - Ofiz. kind. Kyiv: Ministry of Natural Resources of Ukraine. 2003. Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page?id_doc=76437.

22. Trygub, V. I., & Domuschy, S. V. (2020). Biotesting as a method for studying soil toxicity. (2020). Visnyk ONU. Series: Heohrafichni i heolohichni nauky, 25(2(37)), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.18524/2303-9914.2020.2(37).216565.

23. Trofimov, I., Pavliukh, L., Novakivska, T., & Bondarenko, D. (2020). Assessment of Fitototic Toxicity of Mixed Aviation Fuels Using of Plant Testers. International independent scientific journal, 11, 9-17.

24. Franchuk, H. M., Hroza, V. A., & Madzhd, S. M. (2012). Multifactorial analysis of soil toxicity in the areas near the airport. Visnyk NAU, 1, 196-201.

25. Madzhd, S. M., Bovsunovskyi, Ye. O., & Tahachynska, O. (2016). Scientific methods to control the density of soils as an indicator of ecological problems in technogenically induced territories. Bulletin of the KrNU named after Mikhail Ostrogradsky, 2(97), Part 1, 115-121.

26. Shevchenko, O., & Popytailenko, D. (2022). Influence of Microbiological Pollution. Chemmotological Aspects of Sustainable Development of Transport, Sustainable Aviation, Springler, 209-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06577-4_11.

• < Prev
• Next >