Articles

Influence of diesel vehicles on the biosphere

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №5 2021

Last Updated on 29 October 2021

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 5020

Authors:

V.Volkov, orcid.org/0000-0003-2202-3441, Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University, Kharkiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

N.Vnukova, orcid.org/0000-0002-4097-864X, Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University, Kharkiv, Ukraine, e-mail This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

I.Taran, orcid.org/0000-0002-3679-2519, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.Pozdnyakova, orcid.org/0000-0002-7409-2839, Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University, Kharkiv, Ukraine, e-mail This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

T.Volkova, orcid.org/0000-0001-8546-4119, Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University, Kharkiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2021, (5): 094 - 099

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-5/094

Abstract:

Purpose. To identify environmental climatic impacts resulting from the biodiesel fuel use for vehicles (Vs).

Methodology. The methods are based on computation of natural resource consumption and toxic emission with the help of environmental footprint calculator being a software program.

Findings. The results of integral assessment of the environmental impact (namely, consumption of water, power, natural resources, and emission of greenhouse gases ₂, and NO_x in terms of such base traction trucks as VOLVO FM, FH, FE, and FL) were computed for biodiesel fuel types 0, 7, 30, 100 depending upon different standards of EURO propellants. Both positive and negative environmental impact factors have been determined for consuming biofuels during full lifecycle of Vs. It has been defined that minor decrease in ₂ emission owing to the use of standard modern biodiesel fuel is followed by significant increase in NO_x emission as well as power and water consumption in terms of first-generation biodiesel fuel utilization. VOLVO F Vs were applied for comparative analysis of environmental impact by first-generation biodiesel fuel (i.e. 7, 30, 100) and second-generation fuel being hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO). Similar tendencies were recognized. Moreover, opportunity to apply biodiesel fuels along with other measures decreasing ₂ emission was analyzed.

Originality. Originality is stipulated by the use of the integrated assessment of impact of vehicles on climate change as well as use of natural resources while applying biodiesel fuel for vehicles.

Practical value. It is possible to forecast environmental consequences resulting from the use of various biodiesel fuels for Vs.

Keywords: greenhouse effect, biodiesel fuel, life cycle of Vs, nitrogen oxides

References.

1. Knoema (n.d.). World Data Atlas. Ukraine. Environment. Retrieved from https://knoema.com/atlas/Ukraine/topics/Environment.

2. Redziuk, .M., & Klymenko, .. (2018). On the strategy of increasing efficiency of energy consumption in road transport. Avtoshliakhovyk Ukrayiny, 4(256), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.33868/0365-8392-2018-4-256-2-11.

3. Gritsuk, I., Pohorletskyi, D., Mateichyk, V., Symonenko, R., Tsiuman, M., Volodarets, M., , & Sadovnyk, I. (2020). Improving the Processes of Thermal Preparation of an Automobile Engine with Petrol and Gas Supply Systems (Vehicle Engine with Petrol and LPG Supplying Systems). SAE Technical Paper, 2020-01-2031. https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-2031.

4. Taran, I., & Litvin, V. (2018). Determination of rational parameters for urban bus route with combined operating mode. Transport Problems, 13(4), 157-171. https://doi.org/10.20858/tp.2018.13.4.14.

5. Kozachenko, D., Dovbnia, M., Ochkasov, ., Serdiuk, V., Shepotenko, A., & Kerys, . (2018). Rationale for Choosing the Type of Traction Rolling Stock for the Enterprise of Industrial Transport. Proceedings of 22^nd International Scientific Conference. Transport Means 2018, 991-995. Retrieved from https://transportmeans.ktu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/307/2018/02/Transport-means-II-A4-2018-09-25.pdf.

6. Taran, I. (2012). Interrelation of circular transfer ratio of double-split transmissions with regulation characteristic in case of planetary gear output. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (3), 78-85.

7. Kutenev, V.F., Kozlov, .V., Terenchenko, .S., & Shiute, Yu.V. (n.d.). Challenging issues in limiting CO₂ emissions from vehicles. Retrieved from. http://www.aae-press.ru/j0062/art016.htm.

8. Achinas, S., Horjus, J., Achinas, V., & Euverink, G.J.W. (2019). APESTLE Analysis of Biofuels Energy Industry in Europe. Sustainability, 11, 5981. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215981.

9. International Energy Agency (n.d.). Energy Technology Perspectives 2010. Scenarios and Strategies to 2050. https://doi.org/10.1787/energy_tech-2010-en.

10. Achinas, V., & Euverink, G.J.W. (2019). Feasibility Study of Biogas Production from Hardly Degradable Material in Co-Inoculated Bioreactor. Energies, 2, 1040. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12061040.

11. Ghanimeh, S., Khalil, C.A., & Ibrahim, E. (2018). Anaerobic digestion of food waste with aerobic post-treatment: Effect of fruit and vegetable content. Waste Management and Research, 36, 965-974. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X18786397.

12. Cherubini, F., & Strmman, A.H. (2011). Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresource Technology, 102(2), 437-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.010.

13. Presser, ., Nazarian, A., & Millo, A. (2018). Laser-Driven calorimetry measurements of petroleum and biodiesel fuel. Fuel, 214, 656-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.086.

14. Kuchkina, A.Yu., & Sushchik, N.N. (2014). Feedstocks, Methods and Perspectives of Biodiesel Production. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Biology, 1(7), 14-42.

15. Bonomi, A., Klein, B.C., Chagas, M.F., & Dias Souza, N.R. (2018). Technical Report Comparison of Biofuel Life Cycle Analysis Tools Phase 2, Part 1: FAME and HVO/HEFA. Campinas: IEA Bioenergy.

16. Campbell, J. E., & Block, E. (2010). Land-Use and Alternative Bioenergy Pathways for Waste Biomass. Environmental Science & Technology, 44, 8665-8669. https://doi.org/10.1021/es100681g.

17. Environmental Footprint Calculator (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.volvotrucks.com/en-en/trucks/alternative-fuels/environmental-footprint.html.

18. Markov, V., Devyanin, S., & Zykov, S. (2016). Optimization of biofuel mixtures with rapeseed oil methyl ester and sunflower oil methyl ester additives. Transport na alternativnom toplive, 5(53), 12-31.

19. UNEP (2011). The Bioenergy and Water Nexus. Nairobi: Oeko-Institut and IEA Bioenergy. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/agriculture/2011-121/UNEP-WCMC2-sep11-en.pdf.

20. Naumov, V., Taran, I., Litvinova, Y., & Bauer, M. (2020). Optimizing resources of multimodal transport terminal for material flow service. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(16), 6545. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166545.

21. Sabraliev, N., Abzhapbarova, A., Nugymanova, G., Taran, I., & Zhanbirov, Zh. (2019). Modern aspects of modeling of transport routes in Kazakhstan.News of the National Academy of sciences of the Republic Kazakhstan, 2(434), 62-68. https://doi.org/10.32014/2019.2518-170X.39.

• < Prev
• Next >