Articles

Assessment of the individual risk of fatal injury to coal mine workers during collapses

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Contens №4 2020

Last Updated on 05 September 2020

Published on 30 August 2020

Hits: 3774

Authors:

M. L. Rudakov, orcid.org/0000-0001-7428-5318, Saint Petersburg Mining University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

E. N. Rabota, orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-1056, Saint Petersburg Mining University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

K. A. Kolvakh, orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-9465, Saint Petersburg Mining University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2020, (4): 088-093

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-4/088

повний текст / full article

Abstract:

Purpose. To develop an effective model for assessing occupational risk due to rock caving in the country’s coal mines.

Methodology. A mathematical model based on the maximum-likelihood method is presented, which makes it possible to assess the probability of a rockfall. The use of Bayes theorem for assessing the individual risk of fatal injuries of coal mine workers is justified. The complex method for effective control of mountain pressure is illustrated by application of the developed methodology of computer modeling of geomechanical processes, instrumental and geophysical methods for protection and maintenance of mine workings at development of a coal seam of the Barentsburg field.

Findings. The work demonstrates the relationship between the key statistical indicator that affects the accident rate and the value of professional risk. A key statistical indicator, the value of which is determined using the multifunctional systems of safety, is substantiated.

Originality. The development efficiency of the multifunctional safety system installation in coal mines to monitor the condition of the rock mass is analyzed.

Practical value. The model developed by the authors will make it possible to determine the predicted value of the individual risk of fatal injury to personnel during rock collapse more accurately compared to the existing methods.

References.

1. Report of the Federal Service for Ecological, Technological and Nuclear Supervision “State of industrial safety at hazardous production facilities of the coal industry” (2019). Retrieved from http://docs.cntd.ru/document/560448587.

2. Kabanov, E. I., Korshunov, G. I., Kazanin, O. I., Rudakov, M. L., & Nedosekin, A. O. (2017). Development of a methodology for assessing the risks of accidents in coal mines, taking into account specific mining and geological conditions. Mountain News and Analysis Bulletin, 4, 374-383.

3. The concept of acceptable risk (2019). Retrieved from http://ohrana-bgd.ru/bgdobsh/bgdobsh1_39.html.

4. Parkhanski, U. (2016). Risk of injury to workers in coal mines and its hysteresis. Notes of the Mining Institute, 222, 869-876. https://doi.org/110. 18454/PM1.2016.6.869.

5. Rostekhnadzor Order No. 339 “On the Approval of Federal Norms and Rules in the Field of Industrial Safety “Instruction for predicting dynamic phenomena and monitoring the massif of rocks during mining of coal deposits”” (2016). Retrieved from https://legalacts.ru/doc/prikaz-rostekhnadzora-ot-15082016-n-339-ob-utverzhdenii-federalnykh/.

6. Iphar, M., & Cukurluoz, A. K. (2018). Fuzzy risk assessment for mechanized underground coal mines in Turkey. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 3, 110-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1426804.

7. Babenko, A. G. (2016). Quantitative evaluation of the current risk of exploitation coal mine. News of Higher Educational Institutions, 4, 24-35.

8. ISO 31000:2018, Risk management – Guidelines (2018). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/iso-31000-risk-management.html.

9. Kumar, R., & Ghosh, A. K. (2017). Mines systems safety improvement using an integrated event tree and fault tree analysis. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series D, 98, 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-016-0121-0.

10. Shi, L., Wang, J., Zhang, G., Cheng, X., & Zhao, X. (2017). A risk assessment method to quantitatively investigate the methane explosion in underground coal mine. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 107, 317-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.02.023.

11. Tripathy, D. P., & Ala, C. K. (2018). Risk assessment in underground coalmines using fuzzy logic in the presence of uncertainty. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series D, 99, 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-018-0154-7.

12. Savon, D. Y., Aleksakhin, A. V., Skryabin, O. O., & Goodi­lin, A. A. (2019). Occupational health and safety digitalization in the coal industry. Eurasian Mining, (2), 70-72. https://doi.org/10.17580/em.2019.02.15.

13. Zubov, V. P. (2017). State and directions of system improvement development of coal seams in the perspective coal mines of Kuzbass. Notes of the Mining Institute, 225, 292-297. https://doi.org/10.18454/PMI.2017.3.292.

14. Intima, D. P. (2017). Sampling plan for quality monitoring of suppliers of the sanitation sector. Periodico Tche Quimica, 14(27), 39-43.

15. Zuev, B. Yu., Zubov, V. P., & Fedorov, A. S. (2019). Application prospects for models of equivalent materials in studies of geomechanical processes in underground mining of solid minerals. Eurasian mining, 1, 8-12. https://doi.org/10.17580/em.2019.01.02.

16. Rosenbaum, M. A., Kuzmin, S. V., Antonyuk, S. A., & Do Quang Tuan (2015). Modeling of geomechanical processes on models from equivalent materials. Journal of Mining Industry. Vietnam, 1, 53-56.

• < Prev
• Next >