Науковий вісник НГУ

Formation of a brand of sustainable industrial development in the postwar period

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №3 2022

Last Updated on 29 June 2022

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 3761

Authors:

I.Perevozova, orcid.org/0000-0002-3878-802X, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical Oil and Gas University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

D.Fayvishenko, orcid.org/0000-0001-7880-9801, State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.Melnykovych, orcid.org/0000-0001-8531-8509, State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Yu.Nemish, orcid.org/0000-0002-4676-1177, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical Oil and Gas University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Ye.Shkurov, orcid.org/0000-0001-5947-599X, State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2022, (3): 179 - 184

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-3/179

Abstract:

Purpose. To develop the main directions of industrial recovery as a necessary stage for the formation of a sustainable economy in the postwar period. To develop tools and approaches to rebuild war-torn industries.

Methodology. Methods used are: abstraction and critical analysis in forming the theme and purpose of the work; content analysis for analytical review of the literature; ascent from the abstract to the concrete to form an algorithm for developing a strategy for reconstruction; analysis and synthesis to analyze the amount of losses; idealization and formalization to formulate directions of industrial recovery; system analysis to form a project approach to reconstruction; comparative analysis to stratify the losses of industries.

Findings. The amount of losses of the mining and metallurgical industry is analyzed and it is pointed out that the reason was not only physical destruction, but also the forced closure of enterprises. Assessment of the amount of assistance by its types is performed, which allowed estimating the approximate amount and direction of assistance for recovery in the postwar period. It is noted that the main task in the process of recovery of industries is their deep modernization and introduction of the latest technologies into the production cycle, which will create the preconditions for a sustainable economy.

Originality. It is stated that a single strategic development program is needed to restore the work of industrial infrastructure. The solution of tactical tasks should be consistent with the strategic program. To implement the program and the tasks of a sustainable economy, an Algorithm for developing a strategy for economic reconstruction has been developed. To increase the efficiency of reconstruction industries, use of the project approach is proposed. Projects must be implemented in accordance with the single strategic development program.

Practical value. The main directions of industrial recovery with the emphasis on its reform are formulated and recommendations on tools and approaches of implementing the strategic program of industrial reconstruction are given.

Keywords: sustainable development, brand approach, post-war period, industrial recovery, strategy of economic reconstruction, project approach

References.

1. Natcher Naomi, D., Owens-Beek, N., Bogdan, A.M., Lu, X., Li,M., Ingram, S., McKay, R., & Rice, A. (2022). Scenario planning tools for mitigating industrial impacts on First Nations subsistence economies in British Columbia, Canada. Sustainability Science, 17, 469-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00969-0.

2. Riedy, C. (2022). Discursive entrepreneurship: ethical meaning-making as a transformative practice for sustainable futures. Sustainability Science, 17, 541-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00978-z.

3. Tbara, J.D., Lieu, J., Zaman, R., Ismail, C., & Takama, T. (2022). On the discovery and enactment of positive socio-ecological tipping points: insights from energy systems interventions in Bangladesh and Indonesia. Sustainability Science, 17, 565-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01050-6.

4. Havrysh, V., Nitsenko, V., Perevozova, I., Kulyk, T., & Vasylyk, O. (2022). Alternative Vehicle Fuels Management: Energy, Environmental and Economic Aspects. In Zaporozhets, A. (Ed.). Advanced Energy Technologies and Systems I. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 395, 91-115. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85746-2_5.

5. Zhang, X. (2018). Theory of sustainable development: Concept evolution, dimension and prospect. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2018.01.002.

6. Zeldina, O. (2020). The concept of investment-innovative model in the conditions of sustainable development of the economy of Ukraine. Business law and process, 4, 83-88. https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2020.7.14.

7. Vyniatynska, L., & Kolyesnik, O. (2019). Analysis of the composition and intensity of dynamics of production cost of enterprises of Ukraine. Scientific view: economics and management, 4(66), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.32836/2521-666X/2019-66-18.

8. Al-Dmour, A.H., & Al-Dmour, R.H. (2018). Applying Multiple Linear Regression and Neural Network to Predict Business Performance Using the Reliability of Accounting Information System. International Journal of Corporate Finance and Accounting (IJCFA), 5(2), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCFA.2018070102.

9. Bazaluk, O., Yatsenko, O., Reznikova, N., Bibla, I., Karasova, N., & Nitsenko, V. (2022). International integration processes influence on welfare of country. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(2), 382-398. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2022.16228.

10. Mikhno, I., Koval, V., Shvets, G., Garmatiuk, O., & Tamoinien,R. (2021). Discussion: Green Economy in Sustainable Development and Improvement of Resource Efficiency. Central European Business Review, 10(XX), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.252.

11. Bengtsson, M., Alfredsson, E., Cohen, M., Lorek, S., & Schroeder, P. (2018). Transforming systems of consumption and production for achieving the sustainable development goals: moving beyond efficiency. Sustainability Science, 13, 1533-1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0582-1.

12. Avelino, F. (2017). Power in sustainability transitions: analyzing power and (dis)empowerment in transformative change towards sustainability: power in sustainability transitions. Environmental Policy Government, 27(6), 505-520. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1777.

13. Clark, W.C., & Harley, A.G. (2020). Sustainability Science: Toward a Synthesis. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 45, 331-386. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012420-043621.

14. Bobrovska, O.Yu., Krushelnytska, T.A., & Prokopenko, L.L. (2021). Sustainable development of territories: challenges and opportunities: monograph. Tallinn: International Center for Research, Education and Training. MT.

15. Zhironkin, S., Voloshin, A., Zhironkina, O., Vth, S., & Kayachev, G. (2020). The Principles of Sustainable Development as a Form of Structural Transformation. V^th International Innovative Mining Symposium, E3S Web of Conferences, 174, 04011. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017404011.

16. Nitsenko, V., Nyenno, I., Kryukova, I., Kalyna, T., & Plotnikova,M. (2017). Business model for a sea commercial port as a way to reach sustainable development goals. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 7(1), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2017.7.1(13).

17. Shaw, K. (2019). Implementing Sustainability in Global Supply Chain. Problemy Ekorozwoju Problems of Sustainable Development, 14(2), 117-127.

18. Markard, J., Geels, F., & Raven, R. (2020). Challenges in the acceleration of sustainability transitions. Environmental Research Letters, 15, 081001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9468.

19. Sachs, J.D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N., & Rockstrm, J. (2019). Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability, 2, 805-814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9.

20. Amsili, S. (2022). Qui sont les pays qui aident le plus lUkraine. Les Echos. Retrieved from https://www.lesechos.fr/monde/europe/qui-sont-les-pays-qui-aident-le-plus-lukraine-1402160.

• < Prev
• Next >