Науковий вісник НГУ

Models of the international investment position in Visegrad countries and Ukraine: a comparative analysis

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №3 2022

Last Updated on 11 July 2022

Published on 11 July 2022

Hits: 3664

Authors:

.O.Zadoia, orcid.org/0000-0003-4620-6920, Alfred Nobel University, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

S..Kholod, orcid.org/0000-0003-2556-864X, Alfred Nobel University, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

..Zadoia, orcid.org/0000-0002-4251-3061, Alfred Nobel University, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2022, (3): 173 - 178

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-3/173

Abstract:

Purpose. To classify the models of assets and liabilities of the Visegrad Group and compare them with similar indicators of Ukraines international investment position.

Methodology. The separation of models is carried out by three criteria: the formation of the structure, the degree of risk and the activity of the state. The asset model of Ukraines international investment position is defined as dynamic, with low risk and moderate government intervention. The liability model is also dynamic, but with high risk and increased government activity. Ukrainian economic models are not similar to any of the studied European models and are irrational by most criteria.

Finding. Based on the comparison of the models of assets and liabilities formed in Ukraine with similar indicators of the Visegrad Group countries, a number of hypotheses about the strategy of improving the international investment position of Ukraine have been expressed. The basis for solving these problems should be activities aimed primarily at solving the internal problems of Ukraine, which can improve the mechanisms of direct and portfolio investment.

Originality. An original methodology for classifying the models of assets and liabilities of the countrys international investment position has been developed. Its approbation by the example of Visegrad countries and Ukraine allowed finding the strengths and threats of different models and predict future scenarios of changes in the international investment position.

Practical value. The developed methods for assessing the models of international investment position of the country can be used in other studies, which will allow developing countries to choose a certain international model to develop their own strategy for managing international financial flows.

Keywords: assets, liabilities, models of international investment position, Visegrad Group, Ukraine

References.

1. Balance of payments and international investment position manual (2009). Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.

2. Alves, P., Lpez, E., Martn, C., & Roibs, I. (2020). The Balance of Payments and International Investment Position of Spain in 2019. Economic Bulletin, Banco de Espaa; Economic Bulletin Homepage, (2/2020), 1-20.

3. liwiski, P. (2018). Short and Long Term Determinants of the Net International Investment Position Resulting from the Balance of Payments of the European Monetary Union Countries. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia oeconomica, 4(336), 209-224. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.336.13.

4. Petrikova, Ye.M. (2019). Trends in the development of the balance of payments and the international investment position of Russia. Questions of statistics, 26(10), 46-56.

5. Sivtsova, N.F., Kamyshanchenko, Ye.N., & Boltenkova, Yu.V. (2020). International investment position of the Russian Federation: trends and development prospects. Modern economy: problems and solutions, 7, 96-106. https://doi.org/10.17308/meps.2020.7/2399.

6. Maciejczyk-Bujnowicz, I. (2015). Decomposition of Polish International Investment Position with Selected Countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 6(317). https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.317.06.

7. Maciejczyk-Bujnowicz, I. (2016). International investment position of European countries chosen aspects. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 6(326). https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.326.06.

8. Lomachynska, I., Yakubovskiy, S., & Plets, I. (2018). Dynamics of Austrian foreign direct investment and their influence on the national economy. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(5), 167-174. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-5-167-174.

9. Navoy, A.V. (2014). Analysis of the state and development of the external sector of the economy based on the balance of payments and international investment position. Questions of statistics, 2, 56-59.

10. Mobasher Kazmi (n.d.). Weakening US net international investment position and its implications for holders of US assets. Retrieved from https://www.theasianbanker.com/updates-and-articles/weakening-us-net-international-investment-position-and-its-implications-for-holders-of-us-assets.

11. Fidora, M., & Schmitz, M. (2018). Factors driving the recent improvement in the euro areas international investment position. Economic Bulletin Boxes, European Central Bank, 3. Retrieved from https://www.ecb.europa.eu//pub/pdf/other/ecb.ebbox201803_02.en.pdf.

12. Antoov, G., Vogl, M., & Schraud, M. (2020). Challenges for the Visegrad group the coronavirus crises and its impact on tourism. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, (1), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.2478/vjbsd-2020-0006.

13. Ivanova, E., & Masrov, J. (2018). Performance evaluation of the Visegrad Group countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraivanja, 31(1), 270-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1429944.

14. Keese, M. (2020). The future of work in the Visegrad group of countries. Society and Economy, 42(2), 124-145. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2020.00011.

15. Zadoia, A. (2020). International investment position of the country and the level of its development: relationship between indicators. European vector of economic development, (2), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.32342/2074-5362-2020-2-29-3.

16. The World Bank (2021). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?page=6.

17. International Monetary Fund (2021). Retrieved from https://data.imf.org/?sk=4c514d48-b6ba-49ed-8ab9-52b0c1a0179b&sId=1409151240976.

18. Central Intelligence Service (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/resources/the-world-factbook/.

19. International investment position (according to the methodology of PBC6) (2021). Retrieved from https://bank.gov.ua/files/ES/IIP_y.pdf.

• < Prev
• Next >