Науковий вісник НГУ

Organizational culture in cooperation of business and education in Ukraine

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №3 2021

Last Updated on 23 June 2021

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 4932

Authors:

M.Tepliuk, orcid.org/0000-0001-6823-336X, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

T.Shkoda, orcid.org/0000-0003-1016-4853, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

V.Kukoba, orcid.org/0000-0003-3107-6000, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

T.Chebakova, orcid.org/0000-0002-0370-4981, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

S.Petrovska, orcid.org/0000-0001-5354-1343, National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2021, (3): 184 - 189

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-3/184

Abstract:

Purpose. To improve a method of organizational culture assessment for making management decisions in cooperation of business and education.

Methodology. The study is based on the data of the leading enterprises producing plastics in Ukraine over the period of 20152019. Through the method of binary logic for the purposes of assessing the proposed components of organizational culture of enterprises (intellectual, technical-technological, social, legal and regulatory, professional, communicative, informational), the levels of this culture in plastics manufacturers are determined in mathematical terms.

Findings. Based on the generalization of the results of theoretical research on the economic essence of the organizational culture of the enterprise, its key components and the main parameters characterizing them are identified. Public JSC Ukrplastic is identified as the leading company producing plastic products in Ukraine with the highest performance in organizational culture by individual components of the enterprise. The other analyzed companies have medium level of organizational culture indicators.

Originality. The research is conducive to the studies on organizational culture, especially the perspective of its usage as a tool of cooperation between Ukrainian plastic producers as the business representatives and educational sector.

Practical value. The results of the study can be used by practitioners, scientists, government officials (Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine and its structural departments, local governments in the fields of education and science) to monitor the development of the information economy.

Keywords: organizational culture, cooperation, business, education, plastic producers, Ukraine

References.

1. Espasandn-Bustelo, F., Ganaza-Vargas, J., & Diaz-Carrion, R. (2021). Employee happiness and corporate social responsibility: the role of organizational culture. Employee Relations, 43(3), 609-629. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-07-2020-0343.

2. Schein, E.H., & Schein, P.A. (2016). Organizational Culture and Leadership. 5^th Edition (The Jossey-Bass Business & Management Series), Wiley. ISBN: 978-1-119-21204-1.

3. Sahaidak, M., Tepliuk, M., Zhurylo, V., Rudenko, N., & Samko,O. (2021). Integrative Viewpoint for Implementing Sustainable Management Agricultural Business Excellence. TEM Journal, 10(1), 303-309. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM101-38.

4. Olafsen, A.H., Nilsen, E.R., Smedsrud, S., & Kamaric, D. (2021). Sustainable development through commitment to organizational change: the implications of organizational culture and individual readiness for change. Journal of Workplace Learning, 33(3), 180-196. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-05-2020-0093.

5. Alvi, H.A., Hanif, M., Adil, M.S., Ahmed, R.R., & Vveinhardt, J. (2014). Impact of organizational culture on organizational commitment and job satisfaction. European Journal of Business and Management, 27(6), 30-39.

6. Ababneh, O.M.A. (2021). The impact of organizational culture archetypes on quality performance and total quality management: the role of employee engagement and individual values. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 38(6), 1387-1408. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-05-2020-0178.

7. Antoniuk, L., Britchenko, I., Polischuk, Y., Rudyk, N., Sybirianska, Y., & Machashchik, P. (2018). Code of ethics for SMEs: substantiating the necessity and willingness to implement in Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(3), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(3).2018.12.

8. Semenets-Orlova, I., Klochko, A., Shkoda, T., Marusina, O., & Tepliuk, M. (2021). Emotional intelligence as the basis for the development of organizational leadership during the Covid period (educational institution case). Estudios de Economa Aplicada, 39(5), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i5.5074.

9. Iriqat, R.A. (2016). Organizational Commitment Role in Mediating the Impact of the Organizational Culture Dimensions on Job Satisfaction for MFIs Employees in Palestine. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 7(5), 125-135.

10. Tran, Q.H.N. (2020). Organisational culture, leadership behaviour and job satisfaction in the Vietnam context. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-10-2019-1919.

11. Shorrock, S.T., & Williams, C.A. (2016). Human factors and ergonomics methods in practice: three fundamental constraints. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 17(5-6), 468-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2016.1155240.

12. Maciaszczyk, P., Dyba, M., & Gernego, Iu. (2019). Strategies of human development in the context of global digital change. Economic Studies journal, 28(5), 10-24.

13. Riepina, I., Hrybinenko, O., Parieva, N., Parieva, O., Savenko,I., & Durbalova, N. (2019). Quantity Assessment of the Risk of Investment Projects. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 7256-7260. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C6338.098319.

14. Wolinska, J., & Rakowska, A. (2014). Organizational culture and its role in business. The example of Polish culture. In Proceedings of International Conference Human Capital without Borders: Knowledge and Learning for Quality of Life, 2527 June 2014, (pp. 1089-1095). Slovenia: Portoroz. Retrieved from http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-09-3/papers/ML14-690.pdf.

15. Gautam, D.K., & Basnet, D. (2020). Organizational culture for training transfer: the mediating role of motivation. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-04-2020-2147.

16. Savych, O., & Shkoda, T. (2020). Trends of air transportation market development in Ukraine. Innovative Marketing, 16(2), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.16(2).2020.03.

17. Nitsenko, V., Chukurna, O., Mardani, A., Streimikis, J., Gerasymchuk, N., Golubkova, I., & Levinska, T. (2019). Pricing in the Concept of Cognitive Marketing in the Context of Globalization: Theoretical, Methodological and Applied Aspects. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 15(4), 131-147. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2019.15-4.10.

18. Yatsenko, O. (2021). Polysubjectivity and Contextuality of the Ethical in Contemporary Digital Culture. Future Human Image, 15, 143-153. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/15/13.

19. Chebakova, T. (2020). Methods of the effective implementation of the organizational culture of Ukraines enterprises. European Journal of Economics and Management, 6(1), 173-179.

20. Van Der Heiden, P., Pohl, C., Bin Mansor, S., & Van Genderen,J. (2015). The role of education and training in absorptive capacity of international technology transfer in the aerospace sector. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 76, 42-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2015.05.003.

• < Prev