Peculiarities of formation of the country’s innovative environment based on complex analysis of resources of innovation
- Details
- Category: Contens №5 2020
- Last Updated on 31 October 2020
- Published on 30 October 2020
- Hits: 3135
Authors:
D. S. Bukreieva, orcid.org/0000-0003-3175-5193, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2020, (5): 171-177
https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-5/171
Abstract:
Purpose. To study the regularities and tendencies of the influence of institutional factors on the country’s innovative potential in order to determine the ways of its increase on the basis of studying the indicators of “input” of the level of development of the institutional structure of the country’s innovative potential and develop a conceptual model for the effective functioning of the innovation environment.
Methodology. In solving the tasks, the following methods were used: scientific abstraction – in determining the main problems of the development of national innovation systems; critical analysis, generalization, systematization – to evaluate the effectiveness of innovation policy of countries and to compare them; ranking and statistical analysis – to determine the relationship between individual indicators of the global innovation index and the level of development of the country.
Findings. The ranking of European countries by the main indicators of innovation resources has been carried out in terms of the effectiveness of conducting and using research and development. The “bottlenecks” which constrain the increase in Ukraine’s innovative potential are determined based on the analysis of the “input” indicators of the institutional structure development level of innovation potential. A high degree of dependence of the country’s economic development on its innovative potential is demonstrated. The main directions of increasing the innovative potential of Ukraine on the basis of effective management of innovation resources are formulated. It has been proved that the factors of the environment, namely the political and economic crises, caused by conducting an anti-terrorist operation in the east of the country, are not those that inhibit its innovative development. The main directions of increasing the innovative potential of Ukraine on the basis of efficient management of innovation resources are formulated. The conceptual model for the effective functioning of the innovation environment, which is aimed at increasing the intersectoral coordination of its subjects in order to adapt them to the actual conditions of a country’s development, is developed.
Originality. The peculiarities of the formation of the laws of innovation development on the basis of complex comparative analysis of the indicators of the “input” of the level of development of the institutional structure of the country’s innovative potential have been established, which has allowed identifying the factors that are determining in increasing the innovative potential of Ukraine and, on this basis, developing a conceptual model for the effective functioning of the innovation environment.
Practical value. The obtained results allowed formulating the main priority directions of development in the field of innovation management taking into account neutralization of the “bottlenecks” of the country’s innovative potential.
References:
1. The Global Innovation Index (2019). Retrieved from www.globalinnovationindex.org/analysis-indicator.
2. The Global Competitiveness Report 2019 (2019). Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-competitiveness-report-2019.
3. World Bank Income Group Classification-2019. World Bank (2019). Retrieved from https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups.
4. Bilyk, R. S. (2015). Features of the innovation environment development in Ukraine in terms of global competition. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho Universytetu: Management of Innovations, (4), 27-35.
5. Fagerberg, J. (2018). Innovation, Economic Development and Policy: Selected Essays, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12234.
6. Bondarenko, S. A. (2017). Analytical assessment of the innovative environment of ukraine and its influence on the development of wine producers. Problems of systemic approach in the economy, 58(2), 61-66.
7. Business vocabulary (2019). Retrieved from http://www.businessvoc.ru/.
8. Fagerberg, J., Lundvall, B. A., & Srholec, M. (2018). Global Value Chains, National Innovation Systems and Economic Development. The European Journal of Development Research, 3(22), 533-556. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-018-0147-2.
9. Al-kfairy, M., Khaddaj, S., & Mellor, R. B. (2020). Evaluating the effect of organizational architecture in developing science and technology parks under differing innovation environments. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2019.102036.
10. Litvinenko, I. L. (2016). Conceptual basis for the formation of state innovation policy and the development of national innovation systems. Innovative development of economy, 34(4), 59-72.
11. Kraus, N. (2015). Innovative economy: definition of concept and institutional basis of development. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Economics”, 4(2(1)), 36-42.
12. García, A., García, M., & Dias, J. (2018). The individual’s perception of institutional environments and entrepreneurial motivation in developing economies: Evidence from Cape Verde. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v21i1.2377.
13. Tarapuez, E., & Ramiro, B. (2019). Formal Institutional Factors Influencing the Entrepreneurial Intent in Quindío. RAIS Conference Proceedings. The 14 th International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3459587.
14. Litvinenko, N. І. (2015). Institutional components of socio-economic development of the country. Dnipro: National Mining University.
15. Kurylo, L. I., Slyozko, T. M., & Udovychenko, S. M. (2015). Institutional factors of innovative economy in agriculture. Economic Analysis, 21(2), 144-151.
16. Jakšić, M. (2018). Inclusive Institutions for Sustainable Economic Development. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2018-0001.
17. Bukreieva, D. S. (2017) Controlling – the mechanism of effective enterprise management. Dnipro: National Mining University.
Newer news items:
- Identification and assessment the factors of influence on the formation of the machine-building enterprise sustainable development mechanism - 30/10/2020 05:23
- Management culture: the role of university startups - 30/10/2020 05:21
- Paradigm of state regulation and structural transformation of the national economy from the standpoint of homeostasis - 30/10/2020 05:20
- Theoretical and methodological foundations for the evaluation of management efficiency of joint investment institutions - 30/10/2020 05:19
Older news items:
- Cost evaluation models of R&D products of industrial enterprises - 30/10/2020 05:15
- Methodical aspects of stability development assessment of enterprises - 30/10/2020 05:13
- Assessment of digitalization of public management and administration at the level of territorial communities - 30/10/2020 05:10
- Strategic risk management in the development of university education in Ukraine - 30/10/2020 05:07
- Rational organization of the work of an electric vehicle maintenance station - 30/10/2020 05:06
- Models of technical systems management for the forest fire prevention - 30/10/2020 05:04
- Certain topical issues of criminalization of illegal amber mining - 30/10/2020 05:02
- Efficiency of environmental taxation in European countries: comparative analysis - 30/10/2020 05:01
- Research on technology of complex processing of phosphogypsum - 30/10/2020 04:59
- Control of the start of high-powered electric drives with the optimization in terms of energy efficiency - 30/10/2020 04:55