Науковий вісник НГУ

Science education in the age of Industry 4.0: challenges to economic ­development and human capital growth in Ukraine

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №1 2020

Last Updated on 09 April 2020

Published on 10 March 2020

Hits: 3547

Authors:

S.Dovgyi, Acad. of the NAS of Ukraine, Dr. Sc. (Phys.-Math.), Prof., Junior Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

V.Nebrat, Dr. Sc.(Econ.), Senior Research Fellow, orcid.org/0000-0002-5419-3181, Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

D.Svyrydenko, Dr. Sc. (Philos.), Assoc. Prof., orcid.org/0000-0001-6126-1747, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

S.Babiichuk, Cand. Sc. (Ped.), orcid.org/0000-0001-6556-9351, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2020, (1):146-151
https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-1/146

 повний текст / full article

Abstract:

Purpose. To summarize the experience of implementation of science education approaches in Ukraine, which takes into account the need to overcome the crisis in modern economy, in particular, as to the conformance of current system of specialists’ training in Ukraine to the world trends conceptualized in theoretical provisions of the Industry 4.0 concept.

Methodology. Given the economic slowdown in Ukraine, the authors proposed to verify the potential of science education as a strategy of modernization of education to ensure its role in the formation of the 21^st-century skills. Based on the correlation between the demand for the development of the 21^st-century skills under modern economic conditions and the capabilities of science education as a recognized modern educational strategy, the authors sought to substantiate the responses to the challenges of economic and human capital development in Ukraine. Theoretical (analysis, synthesis, systematization, generalization) and empirical (observation, comparison) research methods are used.

Findings. The analysis of negative trends in the domestic economy (indicators of human capital development, global competitiveness, and others) made it possible to prove the idea that contemporary national education has low institutional capacity to provide an adequate response to the complex challenges of Industry 4.0 economy. The analysis of Ukrainian experience in the implementation of science education showed a beneficial effect of dissemination of modern educational practices that are closely intertwined with the modern trends in economics and management.

Originality. The approach was justified according to which the dissemination of science education ideas is one of the strategies for reorienting the Ukrainian system of future personnel training for modern global labor market, science-based and technologically rich agenda for the development of mankind, proposed by the Industry 4.0 concept.

Practical value. There were demonstrated practical examples of implementating science education approaches, their focus on the development of the 21^st-century skills and on the inclusion in the modern economic processes. This study demonstrated not only a pragmatic estimation of the need for transformation of education following the principles of science education (in alignment with labor market demands, and so on), but also showed the potential of science education in the context of providing learners with real-life tools for active citizenship, helping them to become active participants of socioeconomic and socio-cultural transformations in the age of Industry 4.0.

References:

1. Schumpeter, J. A. (2017). Theory of Economic Development. Imprint Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315135564.

2. Drucker, P. (2012). The Practice of Management. Imprint Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080942360.

3. Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

4. Hladchenko, M., Dobbins, M., & Jungblut, J. (2018). Exploring Change and Stability in Ukrainian Higher Education and Research: A Historical Analysis through Multiple Critical Junctures. Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-0105-9.

5. Fotea, A., & Gutu, C. (2016). Historical and Theoretical Framework of the Relation between Higher Education Institutions and the Process of Regional Economic Development. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040103.

6. Oleksiyenko, A. (2014). Socio-economic forces and the rise of the world-class research university in the post-Soviet higher education space: the case of Ukraine. European Journal of Higher Education, 4(3), 249-265.

7. Kyvliuk, O., Polishchuk, O., Svyrydenko, D., & Yatsenko, O. (2018). Educational management as education diplomacy: strategies for Ukraine. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (3), 139-144. https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2018-3/23.

8.  Hladchenko, M., & Vossensteyn, H. (2019). Ukrainian students’ choice of university and study programme: means–ends decoupling at the state level. Quality in Higher Education, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2019.1634878.

9. The Global Competitiveness Report 2018. Performance overview for Ukraine (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2018/country-economy-profiles/#economy=UKR.

10. Benešová, I., Smutka, L., & Laputková, A. (2018). Specifics of the Mutual Trade of the Post-Soviet Countries. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070102.

11. Human Development Indices and Indicators: 2018 Statistical Update (n.d.). Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2018_summary_human_development_statistical_update_en.pdf.

12. The Future of Jobs(n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs.

13. 16 Skills for 21^st-century education(n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.tomorrowtodayglobal.com/2016/04/25/16-skills-21^st-century-education.

14. ICASE: International Council of Associations for Science Education(n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.icaseonline.net/link2.html.

15. EUCYS-2017: Ukrainian students were honored with three European awards(n.d.). Retrieved from http://man.gov.ua/ua/news/academy_news/mizhnarodni--zdobutki-br-eucys-2017--ukrayinskikh-uchniv-vidznacheno-troma-evropeyskimi-nagorodam.

16. Science Education for Responsible Citizenship. Report to the European Commission of the expert group on science education(n.d.). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_science_education/KI-NA-26-893-EN-N.pdf.

17. Czyż, A., & Svyrydenko, D. (2019). Science Education as a Response to the Needs of the Modern Open “Education for Everyone” System. Future Human Image, 11, 14-21. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/11/2.

• < Prev
• Next >