Науковий вісник НГУ

Educational management as education diplomacy: strategies for Ukraine

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 1

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Economy and management

Last Updated on 17 July 2018

Published on 03 July 2018

Hits: 4622

Authors:

O. Kyvliuk, Dr. Sc. (Ph.), Prof., orcid.org/0000-0002-7900-9299, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Kyiv, Ukra­ine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O. Polishchuk, Dr. Sc. (Ph.), Assoc. Prof., orcid.org/0000-0002-9838-7105, Khmelnytsky Humanities and Pedagogic Academy, Khmelnytsky, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

D. Svyrydenko, Dr. Sc. (Ph.), Assoc. Prof., orcid.org/0000-0001-6126-1747, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Kyiv, Ukra­ine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O. Yatsenko, Cand. Sc. (Ph.), Assoc. Prof., orcid.org/0000-0003-0584-933X, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Kyiv, Ukra­ine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract:

Purpose. Under the condition of the absence of a scientific debate over the concept of “educational diplomacy” in the national research field, the authors set the goal of carrying out an analysis of the heuristic potential of this concept to overcome the current contradictions in the development of the Ukrainian higher education system against the background of the expansion of the categorical and conceptual apparatus in modern educational management.

Methodology. The authors used systematic, analytical, abstracting, concrete historical approach and modeling method, as well as approaches to cultural research, in particular, the modern theory of hybridity.

Findings. The research succeeded in substantiating the managerial potential of educational diplomacy to solve the contradictions in the development of Ukrainian higher education system. It is shown that the lack of a theoretical discussion about the possibilities of educational diplomacy and the practical implementation of its approaches to management practice reduces the efficiency of modernization processes. Against the background of possibilities to increase the effectiveness of the implementation of the higher education globalization strategies, the possibilities of educational diplomacy for overcoming the current conflicts in the development of higher education, initiated by the fact of the disintegration of the educational area and its management system have been demonstrated.

Originality. The potential of the concept of “educational diplomacy” for the solution of global and local (national) contradictions in the development of higher education, and the system of education management have been demonstrated in the modern Ukrainian management discourse for the first time. The necessity of practical implementation of educational diplomacy approaches is revealed, taking into account the positive foreign experience of their use. Underestimated possibilities of educational diplomacy for Ukrainian traditions of education management, which can implement in practice the principles of consensus philosophies, resolve contradictions, and others in specific socio-cultural conditions, have been presented for the first time in order to provide strategies for the modernization of higher education in an effective manner.

Practical value. The obtained results can serve as a reference point for the modernization of educational policy in the conditions of disintegration of the educational area, ensuring state policy in the context of violated territorial integrity of Ukraine, in particular, in developing scenarios for the reintegration of the national educational area.

References.

1. Bartram, L., Malhoyt-Lee, J., Sheen-Diaz, C. and Sullivan, J., 2015. Education Diplomacy in Action: Touching Lives: Education Diplomacy in Service to Others, Childhood Education, 91(2), pp. 156‒159. DOI: 10.1080/00094056.2015.1018797.

2. Center for Education Diplomacy. Available at: <http://www.educationdiplomacy.org> [Accessed 08 Sep­tember 2017].

3. Foster, K., 2010. The Principles and Practice of Educational Management, School Leadership & Management, 22:4, pp. 456‒457. DOI: 10.1080/ 13632430210001591903.

4. Bazaluk, O., 2017. Plato’s and Isocrates’ Traditions in the Development of Educational Theories in the History of Culture. Annals of the University of Craiova – Philosophy Series, 40(2), pp. 5‒18.

5. Bazaluk, O. and Nezhyva, О., 2016. Martin Heidegger and Fundamental Ontology. Annals of the University of Craiova – Philosophy Series, 38(2), pp. 71‒83.

6. Ntuli, E. and Nyarambi, A., 2015. Learning in a Global Context: Education Diplomacy in Primary Grade Content Preparation. Childhood Education, 91(2), pp. 111‒116. DOI: 10.1080/00094056.2015.1018789.

7. Hladchenko, M., 2014. Perspectives of the Development of the Strategic Management in Ukrainian Higher Education, The New Educational Review, 35(2), pp. 240‒253.

8. Campbell, C., 2010. Exploring recent developments and debates in education management, Journal of Education Policy, 14:6, pp. 639‒658. DOI: 10.1080/ 026809399286143.

9. Nezhyva, O., 2016. Features of Formation of Ukrainian Education Policy, Future Human Image, 6, pp. 81‒90.

10. Krichevsky, S., 2017. A Management Concept of the Technosphere’s Evolution, Philosophy and Cosmology, 18, pp. 153‒164.

11. Bazaluk, О., Svyrydenko, D. and Terepyshchyi, S., 2017. Structural-Functional Models of Integration and Reintegration of Ukrainian Educational Landscape. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 5, pp. 163‒168.

12. Svyrydenko, D., 2017. Divided Universities: The Postcolonial Experience of Contemporary Ukrainian Higher Education. Future Human Image, 7, pp. 128‒134.

13. Andriukaitiene, R., Voronkova, V., Kyvliuk, O., Maksimenyuk, M. and Sakun, A., 2017. Theoretical insights into expression of leadership competencies in the process of management, Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(1), pp. 220‒226. DOI: 10.21511/ppm.15(1-1).2017.09.

14. Gomilko, O., Svyrydenko, D. and Terepyshchyi, S., 2016. Hybridity in the Higher Education of Ukraine: Global Logic or Local Idiosyncrasy? Philosophy and Cosmology, 17, рр. 177‒199.

15. Hladchenko, M., 2016. The organizational identity of Ukrainian universities as claimed through their mission statements, Tertiary Education and Management, 22(4), pp. 376‒389. DOI: 10.1080/13583883.2016.1236144.

16. Oleksiyenko, A., 2015. Internationalization legacies and collaboration challenges: Post-imperial hybrids and political fallouts in Russian higher education, Frontiers of Education in China, 10(1), pp. 23‒45. DOI: 10.3868/s110-004-015-0003-7.

17. Ilnitskiy, D., 2014. Social and economic diminutions of educational diplomacy: theory, practice and methods of analysis, Strategy for development of Ukraine. Economy, sociology, law: scientific journal, 1, pp.72–80.

 повний текст / full article

• Next >