Науковий вісник НГУ

Innovation and technological unemployment in Ricardo’s theory of economic growth

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №5 2025

Last Updated on 25 October 2025

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 1778

Authors:

T. O. Pasichnyk*, orcid.org/0000-0002-7284-7345, University of Customs and Finance, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2025, (5): 199 - 207

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2025-5/199

Abstract:

Purpose. To analyze the relationship between induced innovations, economic growth and technological unemployment in the theory of D. Ricardo, as well as to adapt the mathematical model of L. Pasinetti to test the economic effects of replacing human labor with machines.

Methodology. The research methodology is based on a combination of system analysis and economic and mathematical modeling. Specific economic research methods are used: frontier analysis (to model the dynamics of the evolution of capital, employment and other indicators of economic conditions under the influence of changes in other factors); equilibrium analysis (to find the states of stationary equilibrium of the economic system); graphical analysis (for data processing and visual demonstration of the research results).

Findings. The main components of D. Ricardo’s economic growth model are analyzed. Using the adapted mathematical model of L. Pasinetti, the pessimistic and optimistic scenarios of economic growth with regard to technological progress are tested. It is proved that D. Ricardo’s system is holistic, logically complete and subject to mathematical formalization. It is demonstrated that under certain conditions, the Ricardian model allows for the simultaneous introduction of innovations and the absence of a reduction in gross product in the short term.

Originality. The methodological approaches to studying the relationship between innovation and technological progress, on the one hand, and employment and technological unemployment, on the other hand, have been further developed. An integral part of this relationship is economic growth, the dynamics of which determines the nature of the impact of innovations on the welfare of the population. The analysis of the Ricardian model has shown that with the gradual introduction of machines and their sufficiently high efficiency, the new steady state equilibrium is characterized by higher values of accumulated capital, employment and gross product than the previous one.

Practical value. The article proposes a modified mathematical model by L. Pasinetti, which forms a Ricardian methodological framework for analyzing the socio-economic effects of induced innovations. The obtained results can be adapted and applied to analyze modern aspects of technological unemployment, in particular, for further study of the phenomenon of artificial intelligence and digitalization of the economy.

Keywords: economic growth, innovation, technological progress, technological unemployment

References.

1. Magnani, M. (2022). New jobs or technological unemployment? In Making the global economy work for everyone, (pp. 101-127). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92084-5_5

2. Montesano, A. (2011). Ricardo on machinery. What matters: technical progress or substitution of machines for circulating capital? History of Economic Ideas, 19(1), 103-124.

3. Freni, G., & Salvadori, N. (2016). Ricardo on Machinery: A Textual Analysis. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/73427/1/MPRA_paper_73427.pdf

4. Tavani, D. (2023). The Classical Model of Growth and Distribution. Working Papers. New School for Social Research. Retrieved from https://www.economicpolicyresearch.org/econ/2023/NSSR_WP_112023.pdf

5. Hollander, S. (2019). Retrospectives: Ricardo on Machinery. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.229

6. Mokyr, J., Vickers, C., & Ziebarth, N. L. (2015). The History of Technological Anxiety and the Future of Economic Growth: Is This Time Different? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.31

7. Ramirez, M. D. (2018). Marx and Ricardo on machinery: a critical note. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26(1), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2018.1523208

8. Acemoglu, D. (2021). The harms of Ai. In NBER Working Paper. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3922521

9. Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2024). Learning From Ricardo and Thompson: Machinery and Labor in the Early Industrial Revolution and in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Annual Review of Economics, 16(1), 597-621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-091823-025129

10.      Aghion, P., Jones, B. F., & Jones, C. I. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth. NBER Working Papers. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/AJJ-AIandGrowth.pdf

11.      West, D. M. (2018). The Future of Work: Robots, AI, and Automation. Brookings Institution Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctt1vjqp2g

12.      Sachs, J. D., Benzell, S. G., & LaGarda, G. (2015). Robots: Curse or Blessing? A Basic Framework. NBER Working Papers Series. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w21091

13.      Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019

14.      Prokopowicz, K. (2022). Technological unemployment ‒ who is afraid of losing their job to a robot? Journal of Business Management, 20, 118-129. https://doi.org/10.32025/JBM22001

15.      Morikawa, M. W. (2017). Who Are Afraid of Losing Their Jobs to Artificial Intelligence and Robots? Evidence from a Survey. GLO Discussion Paper Series 71. Global Labor Organization. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/158005

16.      Yedynak, V. Y., Kovtun, N. S., Pasichnyk, T. O., Ka­kho­vych, Yu. O., & Kakhovych, O. O. (2024). Personnel development under digital economy conditions. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (2), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2024-2/153

17.      Ricardo, D., & McCulloch, J. R. (2022). The works of David Ricardo. Legare Street Press.

18.      Tsoulfidis, L. (2021). Ricardo’s labor theory of value is alive and well in modern capitalism. World Review of Political Economy, 12(4), 493-518. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/48676107

19.      Malthus, T. R. (2018). An essay on the principle of population (S. C. Stimson, Ed.). Yale University Press. Retrieved from https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300177411/an-essay-on-the-principle-of-population

20.      Kurz, H. D. (2015). David Ricardo: on the art of “elucidating economic principles” in the face of a “labyrinth of difficulties.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(5), 818-851. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2015.1074713

21.      Ricardo, D. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. P. Sraffa, & M. Dobb (Eds.), Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Retrieved from https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/ricardo-the-works-and-correspondence-of-david-ricardo-11-vols-sraffa-ed

• < Prev
• Next >