Науковий вісник НГУ

Synergistic approach to the resilience management of socio-ecological and economic development of Ukraine

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №3 2025

Last Updated on 25 June 2025

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 3202

Authors:

E.M.Libanova, orcid.org/0000-0001-7170-7159, Institute for Demography and Life Quality Problems of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

M.A.Khvesyk, orcid.org/0000-0003-4306-4904, Institute for Demography and Life Quality Problems of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

A.O.Hutorov*, orcid.org/0000-0002-6881-4911, National Scientific Center “Institute of Agrarian Economics”, Kyiv, Ukraine; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.I.Gutorov, orcid.org/0000-0003-0688-9413, Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Odesa, Ukraine; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.A.Yermolenko, orcid.org/0000-0003-3590-5187, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, Kharkiv, Ukraine; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2025, (3): 192 - 200

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2025-3/192

Abstract:

Purpose. To substantiate the institutional framework for the synergistic resilience management of socio-ecological and economic development of Ukraine.

Methodology. The study of resilience management of socio-ecological and economic development of Ukraine is based on a synergistic approach. The abstract-logical, deductive and synthesis methods are used for theoretical summarization and conclusions. The method of generalization and abstraction is used to determine the factors of ecosystem resilience and the principles of managing the resilience of socio-ecological and economic development. The monographic method and the method of system analysis are used to define the essence of resilience of socio-ecological and economic development and to elaborate conceptual frameworks for management in the context of post-war resilient management. The method of formalization is used to develop structural and logical schemes for managing the resilience of socio-ecological and economic development of Ukraine. The graphic method is used for schematic presentation of certain theoretical statements of the studied phenomena and processes.

Findings. The classification of ecosystem resilience factors has been updated. Conceptual framework of resilience management of socio-ecological and economic development of Ukraine, as well as a scheme for streamlining the process of forming a model of resilient socio-ecological and economic development in the post-war period by the main areas of activity, has been worked out. The conceptual framework of change management in the context of building a post-war type of resilient management has been specified. The scheme of combinatorial management actions in resilient socio-ecological and economic systems has been suggested.

Originality. The conceptual model for resilience management of the socio-ecological and economic development of Ukraine based on a synergistic approach has been substantiated, which allows taking into account the nonlinear, self-organizing nature of the interaction between social, economic and environmental subsystems. The classification of ecosystem resilience factors has been improved, taking into account the synergistic effects of interaction between institutional, social, economic and natural components, which allows for the formation of flexible strategies for responding to crisis situations.

Practical value. Adoption of the conceptual framework of a synergistic approach to resilience management in the socio-ecological and economic development of Ukraine makes it possible to achieve flexibility, adaptability of the economic system, the ability to return to a stable state after passing through bifurcation points, and to recover at the cost of its own resources and growth drivers.

Keywords: resilience, stability, adaptability of management, synergistic approach, socio-ecological and economic development

References.

1. Khaustova, V. Ye., & Reshetnyak, O. I. (2023). Resilience of Economy: Its Essence and Challenges for Ukraine. Business Inform, 7(546), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2023-7-30-41

2. Cherevatskyi, D. (2023). The Resilience of Economics and the Economics of Resilience. Economy of Industry, 1(101), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2023.01.031

3. Latour, B. (2023). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001

4. Hutorov, A., & Pugachov, M. (2023). Coherent Resilience of Agroeconomic Systems. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology, 8(2), 400-404. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2023-2-58

5. Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability, and Transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03610-150420

6. Derissen, S., Quaas, M. F., & Baumgärtner, S. (2011). The Relationship between Resilience and Sustainable Development of Ecological-Economic Systems. Ecological Economics, 70(6), 1121-1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.003

7. Zhou, X., & Wu, J. (2020). A Review of Social-Ecological System Resilience: Mechanism, Assessment and Management. Science of the Total Environment, 723, 138113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138113

8. Berkes, F. (2017). Environmental Governance for the Anthropocene? Social-Ecological Systems, Resilience, and Collaborative Learning. Sustainability, 9(7), 1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071232

9. Kendani, S. S., & Febriani, R. E. (2024). Social and Environmental Dynamics in Economic Resilience: A Review of the Influence on GRDP. Convergence: the Journal of Economic Development, 6(2), 164-183.

10.      Grêt-Regamey, A., Huber, S. H., & Huber, R. (2019). Actors’ Diversity and the Resilience of Social-Ecological Systems to Global Change. Nature Sustainability, 2(4), 290-297. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0236-z

11.      Mishra, A. K., Kumbhakar, S., & Lien, G. (Eds.) (2023). Managing Risk in Agriculture. Oxfordshire: CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781800622289.0000

12.      Zhang, C., Li, Y., & Zhu, X. (2016). A Social-Ecological Resilience Assessment and Governance Guide for Urbanization Processes in East China. Sustainability, 8(11), 1101. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111101

13.      Perry, D., Praskievicz, S., McManamay, R., Saxena, A., Grimm, K., Zegre, N., …, & Rushforth, R. (2024). Resilient Riverine Social-Ecological Systems: A New Paradigm to Meet Global Conservation Targets. WIREs Water, 11(6), e1753. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1753

14.      Mngumi, L. E. (2019). Socio-Ecological Resilience to Climate Change Effects in Peri-Urban Areas: Insights from the Pugu and Kazimzumbwi Forest Reserves of Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. GeoJournal, 86(1), 339-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10071-9

15.      Anamaghi, S., Behboudian, M., Mahjouri, N., & Kerachian, R. (2023). A Resilience-Based Framework for Evaluating the Carrying Capacity of Water and Environmental Resources under the Climate Change. Science of the Total Environment, 902, 165986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165986

16.      Pyrozhkov, S., Reznikova, O., Gnatiuk, S., & Kuryata, Y. (2023). Assessing the Reliability of Complex Systems under Uncertainty in the Context of Ensuring National Resilience. Science and Innovation, 19(4), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine19.04.003

17.      Grytsenko, A., Bilorus, O., Burlay, T., Podliesna, V., & Borzenko, O. (2024). Ukraine’s Economy: Resilience under War and Challenges for Post-War Recovery. Science and Innovation, 20(5), 16-34. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine20.05.016

18.      Libanova, E. (2024). Resilience of the Socio-Economic System of Ukraine to the Shocks Caused by the War: Specifics of Formation and Response. Demography and Social Economy, 58(4), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2024.04.003

19.      Hutorov, A., Lupenko, Y., Sherstiuk, S., Ponomarenko, Y., Hutorova, O., & Yermolenko, O. (2021). Innovative Potential of the Agrarian Sector of Ukraine: Forming and Efficiency of Realization. TEM Journal, 10(3), 1228-1238. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem103-29

20.      Ingram, K., Diachenko, O., Halytskyi, O., Nitsenko, V., Romaniuk, M., & Zhumbei, M. (2022). Formalization of the Optimal Choice of the Activities of Agricultural Enterprises for the Implementation of Information and Communication Technologies. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 3(44), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.3.44.2022.3758

21.      Libanova, E. M. (Ed.) (2023). Priorities for Post-War Environmental Restoration and Ecosystem Resilience. Kyiv: Institute for Demography and Life Quality Problems of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. ISBN: 978-617-14-0210-2.

22.      Elmqvist, T., Andersson, E., Frantzeskaki, N., McPhearson, T., Olsson, P., Gaffney, O., Takeuchi, K., & Folke, C. (2019). Sustainability and Resilience for Transformation in the Urban Century. Nature Sustainability, 2(4), 267-273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1

23.      Folke, C., Haider, L. J., Lade, S. J., Norström, A. V., & Rocha, J. (2021). Commentary: Resilience and Social-Ecological Systems: A Handful of Frontiers. Global Environmental Change, 71, 102400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102400

24.      Khvesyk, M., Obykhod, H., & Mandzyk, V. (2024). Institutional Tools for Ensuring Resilience of Natural Resource Complex: Security Aspect. Economy of Ukraine, 67(8), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2024.08.077

25.      GOAL (2015). Toolkit for Measuring Community Disaster Resilience. Guidance Manual. Retrieved from https://www.goalglobal.org/images/GOAL_Toolkit_Disaster_Resilience_Guidance_Manual_May_2015.compressed.pdf

26.      Tananaiko, T., Yatsenko, O., Osypova, O., Nitsenko, V., Balezentis, T., & Streimikiene, D. (2023). Economic Rationale for Manifestations of Asymmetry in the Global Trading System. Sustainability, 15, 5316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065316

• < Prev
• Next >