Науковий вісник НГУ

Environmental management: restoration of the biotic component of anthropogenically loaded ecosystems

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Parent Category: 2026

Category: Content №2 2026

Created on 25 April 2026

Last Updated on 25 April 2026

Published on 30 November -0001

Written by O. Mikheev, S. Madzhd, I. Yakymenko, V. Isaenko, V. Yermakov

Hits: 1428

Authors:

O. Mikheev, orcid.org/0000-0003-4763-4169, National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Institute of Cell Biology and Genetic Engineering, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

S. Madzhd*, orcid.org/0000-0003-2857-894X, National University of Food Technologies, Kyiv, Ukraine, е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

I. Yakymenko, orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-5449, National University of Food Technologies, Kyiv, Ukraine, е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

V. Isaenko, orcid.org/0000-0003-4071-4633, The International University of Logistics and Transport in Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Republic of Poland, е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

V. Yermakov, orcid.org/0000-0003-4548-235X, State Enterprise ‘United Company “Ukrvuglerestrukturyzatsiya”, Kyiv, Ukraine,  е-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2026, (2): 103 - 111

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2026-2/103

Abstract:

Purpose. Development of principles for managing restoration processes in anthropogenically stressed ecosystems.

Methodology. Standardised methods of laboratory and field research were used, as well as methods of statistical processing of experimental results. To assess the state of anthropogenic load, standardised methods based on the use of maximum permissible concentrations of substances were applied. The dynamics of intra-ecosystem processes were studied using quantitative and qualitative assessment methods, including biodiversity, soil condition, surface water bodies, and anthropogenic impact factors. Statistical analysis was performed using the Corel Quatro Pro 7 statistical package.

Findings. The main theoretical and methodological provisions of the developed concept of hyperadaptation are presented. The patterns of the relationship between the hormetic effect and the tolerance range are established, and it is proven that the hormetic effect for ecosystems is a shift in stability (adaptability) towards optimality. The regulation mechanisms of ecosystem processes have been studied by examining direct and reverse links. It has been proven that reverse links preserve the integrity of the structure and functions of anthropogenically loaded ecosystems, and the duplication of reverse links increases their biotic potential and, consequently, their resistance to anthropogenic influences. A regulatory-functional scheme is presented that characterises the response of biota to external influences – the dynamics of changes in the environment of their existence. It has been proven that biotic potential is capable of reflecting the tendency of internal self-organisation, performing an adaptive function. A methodology has been proposed for assessing the effectiveness and reliability of the functioning of ecosystem self-regulation mechanisms under anthropogenic influences. It has been proven that in order to improve the ecological management of anthropogenically loaded ecosystems, application of phytotechnologies that ecosystems include in intra-ecosystem processes (to restore “damaged” components) as a reserve phytocomponent may be effective.

Originality. The dependence of the biotic potential of ecosystems on the influence of anthropogenic factors has been established, and mechanisms for managing anthropogenically loaded ecosystems through regulation of intra-ecosystem processes is proposed.

Practical value. The results obtained allow for the improvement of the ecological management of ecosystems under an increased risk of ecological imbalance. The developed methodology will allow the use of economically sound measures to increase the biotic potential of ecosystems, in particular phytotechnology.

Keywords: environmental management, environmental sustainability, biotic potential, ecosystem regulation

References.

1. Madzhd, S., Yakymenko, I., & Nychyk, O. (2025). Environmental sustainability as an indicator of ecosystem reliability. Selected papers VІІ International conference European dimensions of sustainable development, 2025, 62-67. Retrieved from https://dspace.nuft.edu.ua/items/6c81a52b-300c-4904-9754-42f602a67031

2. Mikheev, A. N. (2025). The connection between Shelford’s law of tolerance and the concepts of hormesis and hyperadaptation. The evolutionary aspect. Factors of experimental evolution of organisms, 36, 174-179. https://doi.org/10.7124/FEEO.v36.1733

3. Madzhd, S., Nychyk, O., Togachynska, O., Lunova, O., & Maksymenko, O. (2025). Environmental management: Assessing the reliability of ecosystems to ensure their environmental sustainability. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (2), 164-171. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2025-2/164

4. Rev, A. (2022). The Concept of Adaptation. The Annual Review of Environment and Resources, (17), 535-552. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-095719

5. Ekins, P., & Zenghelis, D. (2021). The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability. Sustainability Science, (16), 949-965 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5

6. Isaenko, V., & Cherniak, L. (2019). Development of a procedure for determining the basic parameter of aquatic ecosystems functioning – environmental capacity. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1/10(97), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.157089

7. Ashok, K., Rupesh, К., & Deepak, B. (2024). Emerging drifts big data analytics and environment sustainability (EBAES). Environmental Science and pollution. Retrieved from https://springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-024-35876-1

8. Yarema, L. V., & Zamora, O. I. (2021). Management of the region’s resource potential. Bulletin of the V. V. Dokuchaev Kharkiv National Agricultural University, (1), 364-376. Retrieved from https://journal-met.kh.ua/visn2021_t1.html

9. Dong, J., Zhou, Q., Gao, Y., Gu, Q., Li, G., & Song, L. (2018). Long-term effects of temperature and nutrient concentrations on the phytoplankton biomass in three lakes with differing trophic statuses on the Yungui Plateau, China. Annales de Limnologie ‒ International Journal of Limnology, 54, 9. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2017031

10.      Makota, L., & Novitska, N. (2014). Hygienic aspects of cleaning and reagent-free disinfection of domestic wastewater using the ‘bioplat’ phytotechnology. Scientific and technical collection, (112), 88-94.

11.      Peiyue, Li, Karunanidhi, D., Subramani, T., & Srinivasamoorthy, K. (2021). Sources and Consequences of Groundwater Contamination. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 80, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-020-00805-z

12.      Aronson, J., Blignaut, J. N., & Milton, S. J. (2010). Are socioeconomic benefits of restoration adequately quantified? Restoration Ecology, 18(2), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00651.x

13.      Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. M. (1997). Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277(5325), 494-499. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.494

14.      Chapman, E. J., & Byron, C. J. (2018). The flexible application of carrying capacity in ecology. Global Ecology and Conservation, 13, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.e0 0365

15.      Masikevych, А. Yu., Heretsun, Н. M., Masikevych, Yu. G., Kolotylo, M. P., & Yaremchuk, V. M. (2018). Atmospheric protection as a composition of environmental safety of the region. (Part 1). East European Scientific Journal, 12(40), 30-34.

16.      Turevych, А., Madzhd, S., & Ojeh, V. (2021). Modern means of assessing the impact of emergencies on the environmental condition of the ground layer of atmosphere. Web of Conferences, 280, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128009017

17.      Nezbrytskaya, I. N., & Kureyshevich, A. V. (2015). Changes in the Content of Photosynthetic Pigments in Representatives of Chlorophyta and Cyanoprokaryota at a High Temperature. Hydrobiological journal, 51(4), 46-56.

18.      Matveeva, I. V. (2011). Investigation and assessment of the reliability of radionuclide transport systems in the local agroecosystem. Bulletin of the National Aviation University, 2(47), 148-154.

19.      Azarov, S., & Zadunay, O. (2020). Analysis of methodological approaches to assessing ecosystem sustainability. Ecological safety and environmental management, 34(2), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2020.2.99-110

20       Azarov, S., & Zadunay, O. (2019). Analysis of ecosystem sustainability. Ecological safety and environmental management, 3, 46-56.

21.      Azarov, S., & Zadunay, O. (2018). Modelling the sustainability of ecosystems. Ecological Sciences, 4(23), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2019.2.18-29

22.      War in Ukraine: An overview of environmental impacts and consequences for human health (2024). Frontiers in Sustainable Resource Management. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org

23.      Musikevich, Yu. G., Shestopalov, O. V., & Negadaylo, A. A. (2015). Systems Theory in Ecology. Sumy State University, 330. Retrieved from https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/bitstream-download/123456789/41329/1/ecology.pdf;jsessionid=0090696E66DE848987DD881952BA5FFB

24.      Sarkis, J., & Zhu, Q. (2017). Environmental sustainability and production: taking the road less travelled. International Journal of Production Research, 56, 743-759. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.
2017.1365182

25.      DSanPiN 2.2.4-171-10. Hygienic requirements for drinking water intended for human consumption. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=27272

26.      Directive 2008/105/EC on the establishment of environmental quality standards in the field of water policy. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://compass27.info/vodna-ramkova-dyrektyva-2000-60-yes-2/

27.      DSTU 4173:2003 Water quality. Determination of acute lethal toxicity to Daphnia magna Straus and Ceriodaphnia affinis Lilljeborg (Cladosera, Crustacea) (ISO 6341:1996, MOD). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=72858

• < Prev
• Next >