Articles

A knowledge management culture in the European higher education system

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 1

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №3 2021

Last Updated on 23 June 2021

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 4591

Authors:

O.Horban, orcid.org/0000-0003-2321-5963, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

L.Babenko, orcid.org/0000-0002-6828-1414, Poltava V.G.Korolenko National Pedagogical University, Poltava, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

I.Lomachinska, orcid.org/0000-0003-2537-6322, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.Hura, orcid.org/0000-0003-1830-5307, Poltava V.G.Korolenko National Pedagogical University, Poltava, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

R.Martych, orcid.org/0000-0002-7755-4496, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2021, (3): 173 - 177

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-3/173

Abstract:

Purpose. Improving the quality of educational services by identifying the features and current trends in the development of knowledge management culture in the European higher education system.

Methodology. The research methodology involves application of the systematic approach methods. 1. Structural approach related to defining the structural features of knowledge management culture in higher education institutions in Europe. 2. Functional approach that determines the essence and target orientation of the knowledge management function. The use of the comparative method allowed the authors to highlight the essential content of the concept knowledge management culture in relation to the concepts of organizational culture and information culture. The dialectical method of cognition was also involved, which made it possible to comprehensively consider the phenomenon of knowledge management culture in educational discourse through the contradictory relationships of its various sides and aspects.

Findings. The culture of knowledge management in the European higher education system is considered at three main levels:

1. Cognitive level, implying a change in the style of thinking, mobilization of intellectual potential, and creativity.

2. Management level, involving the use of analytics and innovative leadership.

3. Technological level, based on the use of information and communication technology in the accumulation, transfer and management of knowledge.

Originality. Knowledge management culture is studied in close relationship with the organizational and information culture. The features of knowledge management at three organizational levels have been determined: cognitive, managerial and technological ones.

Practical value. The institutions of the European higher education system use knowledge to gain and maintain competitive advantages. Insufficient attention to the issue of knowledge management leads to a decrease in the ranking of higher education institutions. The introduction of knowledge management culture provides improvement in the psychological microclimate of a team, dominance of the atmosphere of creativity, an increase in the level of self-education, disclosure of personal intellectual potential, formation of a system of innovative leadership, stimulation of scientific research and, as a result, an increase in the quality of educational services.

Keywords: knowledge management, higher education, university, organizational culture

References.

1. Horban, O., Kuprii, T., Martych, R., & Panasiuk, L. (2020). Implications of total quality management in Ukrainian higher education institutions: international experience. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (2), 126-130. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-2/126.

2. Bazaluk, O. (2019). Platos Traditions in Modern Educational Theories. Annals of the University of Craiova Philosophy Series, 43(1/2019), 5-20.

3. Boichenko, M. (2020). Intermarium as One of the Future European Image of Ukraine. Future Human Image, 13, 6-13. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/13/1.

4. Bazaluk, O., & Balinchenko, S. (2020). Dynamic Coordination of Internal Displacement: Return and Integration Cases in Ukraine and Georgia. Sustainability, 12, 4123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104123.

5. Tan, B.-S. (2019). In search of the link between organizational culture and performance: A review from the conclusion validity perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(3), 356-368. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-06-2018-0238.

6. Lomachinska, I., & Lomachynsky, B. (2020). The role of information culture in the regulation of social information systems. Visnuk of the Lviv University. Series Philos.-Political Studies, 29, 90-97.

7. Reinhardt, M.S., Ros, B., Tello, C.P., Gonzlez Navarro, F., & Campbell Ramrez, H. (2020). A knowledge management approach to promote an energy culture in higher education. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(4), 424-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1701962.

8. Castaneda, D.I., & Cuellar, S. (2020). Knowledge sharing and innovation: A systematic review. Knowledge and Process Management, 27, 159-173. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1637.

9. Johanson, M., Kao, P.T., & Lundberg, H. (2020). Knowledge grafting during internationalization: utilizing localized professionals in the foreign market. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(9), 2009-2033. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2018-0747.

10. Pagani, R.N., Ramond, B., Da Silva, V.L., Zammar, G., & Kovaleski, J.L. (2020). Key factors in university-to-university knowledge and technology transfer on international student mobility. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(4), 405-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1678415.

11. Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., & Martelo-Landroguez, S. (2020). The effect of organizational memory on organizational agility: Testing the role of counter-knowledge and knowledge application. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(3), 459-479. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-03-2019-0048.

12. Purcell, W.M., & Chahine, T. (2019). Leadership and governance frameworks driving transformational change in an entrepreneurial UK university. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(5), 612-623. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2018-0280.

13. Mysirlaki, S., & Paraskeva, F. (2020). Emotional intelligence and transformational leadership in virtual teams: lessons from MMOGs. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(4), 551-566. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2019-0035.

14. van Oostrom, M., Pedraza-Rodrguez, J.A., & Fernndez-Esquinas, M. (2019). Does the Location in a Science and Technology Park Influence University Industry Relationships?: Evidence From a Peripheral Region. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(3), 66-82. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJKM.2019070104.

15. Barboza, G., & Capocchi, A. (2020). Innovative startups in Italy. Managerial challenges of knowledge spillovers effects on employment generation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(10), 2573-2596. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2019-0436.

16. Brown, M.E., Rizzuto, T., & Singh, P. (2019). Strategic compatibility, collaboration and collective impact for community change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(4), 421-434. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2018-0180.

17. Sarka, P., Heisig, P., Caldwell, N.H.M., Maier, A.M., & Ipsen,C. (2019). Future research on information technology in knowledge management. Knowledge and Process Management, 26, 277-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1601.

18. Vodenko, K.V., & Lyausheva, S.A. (2020). Science and education in the form 4.0: public policy and organization based on human and artificial intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(4), 549-564. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-11-2019-0274.

19. Alassaf, D., Dabi, M., Shifrer, D., & Daim, T. (2020). The impact of open-border organization culture and employees knowledge, attitudes, and rewards with regards to open innovation: an empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(9), 2273-2297. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2020-0122.

20. Rese, A., Kopplin, C.S., & Nielebock, C. (2020). Factors influencing members knowledge sharing and creative performance in coworking spaces. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(9), 2327-2354. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0243.

• < Prev
• Next >