Technology of co-firing coal and biomass: features, current state, and prospects
- Details
- Category: Content №4 2025
- Last Updated on 26 August 2025
- Published on 30 November -0001
- Hits: 3380
Authors:
V. O. Dzhezhulei, orcid.org/0009-0002-5354-5613, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
I. V. Beztsennyi*, orcid.org/0000-0001-6536-5121, Thermal Energy Technology Institute of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
D. L. Bondzyk, orcid.org/0000-0003-3123-1971, Thermal Energy Technology Institute of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
N. I. Dunayevska, orcid.org/0000-0003-3271-8204, Thermal Energy Technology Institute of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2025, (4): 046 - 054
https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2025-4/046
Abstract:
Purpose. The research focuses on analysing the technology of co-firing biomass and coal (CFBC) as an effective method for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and partially transitioning to renewable energy sources. Particular attention is given to the application of this technology in the context of Ukraine, considering the energy challenges posed by the war and the need to modernise coal-fired power generation.
Methodology. A comprehensive approach was employed in this study, combining the analysis of experimental and computational research. A systematic review of global experience with the implementation of co-firing technologies for coal and biomass was conducted using scientific databases covering the period from 2012 to 2024. The data obtained on global practices provided the theoretical basis for analysing research directions essential for implementing CFBC technology in Ukraine.
Findings. The research revealed that CFBC technology is an effective method for decarbonising coal-fired energy production, particularly in coal-dependent countries such as Ukraine. The findings demonstrated that the optimal share of biomass in the fuel blend during direct pulverised combustion is approximately 10 %, which enables a reduction in NOx emissions by 3–17 % and SO2 emissions by 9 % without requiring significant boiler retrofitting. Furthermore, a synergistic effect was identified: during the co-pyrolysis of coal and biomass, the yield of volatile matter increased by 3–9 % compared to calculated values, significantly improving the ignition and combustion processes of anthracite. However, increasing the biomass proportion beyond 10 % in existing pulverised boilers results in higher unburned residues and may lead to slagging issues due to the high alkali metal content in biomass.
Originality. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of CFBC technology within the context of Ukraine’s energy system, particularly for TPP-210A boiler type. It offers a detailed review of the synergistic effects arising from the combustion of blended fuels and substantiates optimal component ratios to minimise emissions. The research also establishes the optimal biomass content in existing pulverised boilers (up to 10 %), achieving a balance between environmental efficiency and the technological safety of the process.
Practical value. The study demonstrates that CFBC technology is the most accessible and effective solution for the step-by-step decarbonisation of Ukraine’s energy system. The findings provide specific recommendations for modernising existing boilers without significant capital investments, including optimal ratios and methods for blending and feeding the fuel components. The research materials serve as a valuable resource for developing state programmes to support renewable energy, as they offer practical mechanisms for reducing CO₂ emissions by 5–20 % at pulverised power plants.
Keywords: co-firing, biomass, coal, synergistic effect
References.
1. International Energy Agency (2024). World energy outlook 2024. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024
2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Longer report (AR6 SYR). Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_LongerReport.pdf
3. World Health Organization (2025, February 26). WHO unveils updated global database of air quality standards. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news/item/26-02-2025-who-unveils-updated-global-database-of-air-quality-standards
4. Ember (2025, April). Global electricity review 2025. Retrieved from https://ember-energy.org/app/uploads/2025/04/Report-Global-Electricity-Review-2025.pdf
5. Chernyavskyy, M., Makarov, V., Kaplin, M., Bilan, T., & Yevtukhova, T. (2024). Prospects for Coal-Fired Power Plants Fuel Supply in Ukraine. In V. Babak & A. Zaporozhets (Eds.). Systems, Decision and Control in Energy VI, 561. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68372-5_8
6. Ukrainska Enerhetyka (2024). “Energoatom” plans to increase electricity production by 2.3 % in 2024. Retrieved from https://ua-energy.org/uk/posts/enerhoatom-planuie-zbilshyty-vyrobnytstvo-u-2024-rotsi-na-23
7. Volchyn, I., Dunayevska, N., Haponych, L., Chernyavskyi, M., Topal, A., & Zasyadko, Y. (2013). Prospects for the implementation of clean coal technologies in the energy sector of Ukraine. GNOZIS.
8. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2024). Ukraine’s energy security and the coming winter. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/ukraines-energy-security-and-the-coming-winter
9. Nafta i Haz Ukrainy (2024). Ukraine’s energy system: status at the end of 2024 and scenarios for 2025. Retrieved from https://oil-gas.com.ua/statti/enerhetychna_systema_ukrainy_stan_na_kinets_2024_roku_ta_stsenarii_na_2025
10. Triani, M., Tanbar, F., Cahyo, N., Sitanggang, R., Sumiarsa, D., & Lara Utama, G. (2022). The Potential Implementation of Biomass Co-firing with Coal in Power Plant on Emission and Economic Aspects: A Review. EKSAKTA: Journal of Sciences and Data Analysis. https://doi.org/10.20885/eksakta.vol3.iss2.art4
11. Sidiq, A. N. (2022). Pengaruh Co-Firing Biomassa terhadap Efisiensi Boiler PLTU Batubara. KILAT, 11(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.33322/kilat.v11i1.1553
12. Aizat Nudri, N., Azlina Wan Abdul Karim Ghani, W., Thomas Bachmann, R., Hang Tuah Baharudin, B. T., Ng Kok Sum, D., & Syazarudin Md Said, M. (2020). Co-combustion of oil palm trunk biocoal / sub-bituminous coal fuel blends. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2020.100072
13. Agbor, E., Zhang, X., & Kumar, A. (2014). A review of biomass co-firing in North America. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 40, 930-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.195
14. Tillman, D. A., Duong, D., & Harding, N. S. (2012). Solid fuel blending: Principles, practices, and problems. Elsevier, Butterworth-Heinemann.
15. International Energy Agency – Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme (2013). Biomass co-firing in coal power plants (Technology Brief E21). Retrieved from https://iea-etsap.org/E-TechDS/PDF/E21IR_Bio-cofiring_PL_Jan2013_final_GSOK.pdf
16. Moura, P. R.S., de Aquino, T. F., Bianchi, F. M., Viola, V. O., Bonetti, B., de Souza Martins, L., & Milanese, F. H. (2025). Co-combustion of coal and biomass waste in pilot-scale for energy use. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.14608
17. Liu, J., Man, R., Ma, S., Li, J., Wu, Q., Peng, J., & Xi, H. (2016). Study on ash composition and acidic gases emissions during co-combustion of domestic waste and coal. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 64, 530-536.
18. Knapp, S., Güldemund, A., Weyand, S., & Schebek, L. (2019). Evaluation of co-firing as a cost-effective short-term sustainable CO2 mitigation strategy in Germany. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-019-0214-3
19. Rahmanta, M. A., Aprilana, A., Ruly, Cahyo, N., Hapsari, T. W. D., & Supriyanto, E. (2024). Techno-Economic and Environmental Impact of Biomass Co-Firing with Carbon Capture and Storage in Indonesian Power Plants. Sustainability, 16(8), 3423. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083423
20. Yin, C., Wang, Y., Fang, Q., Chen, X., Yan, H., & Ma, L. (2024). Self-heating and spontaneous ignition of biomass storage piles: Towards a reliable prediction tool. Renewable Energy, 228, 120683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120683
21. Yin, C., Rosendahl, L., & Kær, S. K. (2012). Towards a better understanding of biomass suspension co-firing impacts via investigating a coal flame and a biomass flame in a swirl-stabilized burner flow reactor under same conditions. Fuel Processing Technology, 98, 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.01.024
22. Vassilev, S. V., Baxter, D., Andersen, L. K., & Vassileva, C. G. (2013). An overview of the composition and application of biomass ash. Fuel, 105, 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.10.001
23. Niu, Y., Tan, H., & Hui, S. (2016). Ash-related issues during biomass combustion: Alkali-induced slagging, silicate melt-induced slagging (ash fusion), agglomeration, corrosion, ash utilization, and related countermeasures. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 52, 1-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2015.09.003
24. Liu, Q., Chmely, S. C., & Abdoulmoumine, N. (2017). Biomass Treatment Strategies for Thermochemical Conversion. Energy & Fuels, 31(4), 3525-3536. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00258
25. Strzalka, R., Erhart, T. G., & Eicker, U. (2013). Analysis and optimization of a cogeneration system based on biomass combustion. Applied Thermal Engineering, 50(2), 1418-1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.12.039
26. Tokarski, S., Głód, K., Ściążko, M., & Zuwała, J. (2015). Comparative assessment of the energy effects of biomass combustion and co-firing in selected technologies. Energy, 92, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.044
27. Ko, S., & Lautala, P. (2018). Optimal Level of Woody Biomass Co-Firing with Coal Power Plant Considering Advanced Feedstock Logistics System. Agriculture, 8(6), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8060074
28. Sajdak, M., Kmieć, M., Micek, B., & Hrabak, J. (2018). Determination of the optimal ratio of coal to biomass in the co-firing process: feed mixture properties. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(7), 2989-3000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1864-y
29. Sahu, S. G., Chakraborty, N., & Sarkar, P. (2014). Coal–biomass co-combustion: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 575-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.106
30. Ribeiro, J., Godina, R., Matias, J., & Nunes, L. (2018). Future Perspectives of Biomass Torrefaction: Review of the Current State-Of-The-Art and Research Development. Sustainability, 10(7), 2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072323
31. Panahi, A., Tarakcioglu, M., Schiemann, M., Delichatsios, M., & Levendis, Y. A. (2018). On the particle sizing of torrefied biomass for co-firing with pulverized coal. Combustion and Flame, 194, 72-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.04.014
32. Oladejo, J. M., Adegbite, S., Pang, C. H., Liu, H., Parvez, A. M., & Wu, T. (2017). A novel index for the study of synergistic effects during the co-processing of coal and biomass. Applied Energy, 188, 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.005
33. Shchudlo, T., Bondzyk, D., Beztsennyi, I., & Dunaievska, N. (2021). Improvement of methods for processing thermogravimetric studies on solid fuels. Zbirka naukovykh prats XVII Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii “Vuhilna teploenerhetyka: shliakhy rekonstruktsii ta rozvytku”, (pp. 136-139). https://doi.org/10.48126/conf2021
34. Beztsennyi, I. V., Bondzyk, D. L., Shchudlo, T. S., & Dunayevska, N. I. (2020). Obtaining kinetic characteristics of combustion of the coke from solid biofuels. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (6), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-6/015
35. Stroivas, A., Shchudlo, T., Shendrik, T., & Dunaievska, N. (2018). Peculiarities of co-thermolysis of highly metamorphosed coal with various types of biomass. 9 Mizhnar. Nauk.-tekhn. konf. Postup u naftopererobnii ta naftotokhimichnii promyslovosti, (pp. 103-106).
36. Zubkova, V., Strojwas, A., Strojanowska, M., & Kowalczyk, J. (2014). The influence of composition of coal briquettes on changes in volume of the heated coal charge. Fuel Processing Technology, 128, 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.07.022
37. Nekhamin, M. M., & Bondzyk, D. L. (2020). Combustion speed parameters when simulating by ansys fluent program of solid fuel combustion. Energy Technologies & Resource Saving, (1), 41-45. https://doi.org/10.33070/etars.1.2020.5
38. Bondzyk, D., Rokhman, B., & Nekhamin, M. (2021). Numerical study on the effect of adding peat to gas coal on combustion processes. XVII Mizhnarodna naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia “Vuhilna teploenerhetyka: shliakhy rekonstruktsii ta rozvytku”, (pp. 84-90). https://doi.org/10.48126/conf2021
39. Beztsennyi, I., Bondzyk, D., Shchudlo, T., Fateiev, A., Dunaievska, N., & Duliienko, S. (2021). Research into the possibility of using peat to partially replace coal in pulverised coal combustion. XVII Mizhnarodna naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia “Vuhilna teploenerhetyka: shliakhy rekonstruktsii ta rozvytku”, (pp. 90-95). https://doi.org/10.48126/conf2021
40. Shendrik, T., Dunayevska, N., Tsaryuk, A., Ielagin, V., & Fateyev, A. (2020). Experimental development of approaches to reduce the slagging and corrosive activity of salty coal. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(6(108)), 124-133. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.217585
41. Shendrik, T. G., Dunayevska, N. I., Fateyev, A. I., Tsaryuk, A. K., & Yelahin, V. P. (2022). Phenomena and mechanism of slagging and corrosion in energy use of coal with a high content of salts. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (5), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-5/012
42. Dunayevska, N., Shendrik, T., & Fateiev, A. (2025). The approach for reducing of slagging and corrosion properties of fuels with a high content of alkali and alkaline earth metals. Fuel, 381, 133359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133359
43. Chernyavskyy, M. V., Dunayevska, N. I., Provalov, O. Y., & Miroshnychenko, Y. S. (2020). Scientific basis and technologies of anthracite replacement at thermal power plants. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (3), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-3/033
44. Chernyavskyi, M. V., Provalov, O. Y., Miroshnychenko, Y. S., & Kosyachkov, O. V. (2023). Converting Slovianska TPP with the central coal pulverizing plant from anthracite to sub-bituminous coal. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (3), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2023-3/046
45. Chernyavskyi, M., Dunaevska, N., & Bezcennyi, I. (2015). Improvement of zonal thermal calculation of the TPP-210A boiler furnace for the case of burning coal mixtures. 11 th Intern. Sci. and Pract. Conf. “Thermal energy: Problems of rehabilitation and development” (Kyiv, Sept. 2015): Collection of science works, (pp. 70-71). CETI of NAS of Ukraine.
46. Miroshenko, E. S., & Roskolupa, A. I. (2019). Development and testing of technical solutions for the conversion of small and medium power boilers from coal to fuel biomass (on example of the “Radiant” boiler with a steam capacity of 20-24 t/h). 15 th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Thermal energy: Ways of renovation and development”: Collection of scientific works, (pp. 114-116). CETI of NAS of Ukraine. Retrieved from www.ceti-nasu.org.ua/upload/iblock/71a/71ae934a8c8b90e58f1c1933159f732d.pdf
Newer news items:
- The impact of addition of different shapes of tire waste on soil properties - 26/08/2025 01:18
- Probabilistic soil-rock degradation due to heavy metal existence in Tashan-Kaji, Toro LGA (Nigeria) - 26/08/2025 01:18
- Effect of voltage flicker on leakage current in mine electrical networks containing power electronic devices - 26/08/2025 01:18
- Mathematical simulation of brushless high-speed permanent magnet motor - 26/08/2025 01:18
- Instantaneous power of a doubly fed induction generator with the unbalanced stator windings - 26/08/2025 01:18
- Analysis of a soil slope stability based on modified failure criterion - 26/08/2025 01:18
- Determination of bronze БрА7К2О1,5Мц0,3 crystallization interval limit values and phase transformations - 26/08/2025 01:18
- Methodology of the acoustic experiment for studying the aerodynamic noise of wind turbine blade segments - 26/08/2025 01:18
- Gas flow peculiarities in a semi-closed volume during the explosion of an elongated charge of a condensed explosive substance - 26/08/2025 01:18
- Determination of the wear mechanism of the diamond tool matrix by analysis of wear particles - 26/08/2025 01:18
Older news items:
- Physico-chemical characterization of phosphatic waste: statistical approach and efficient valorization remedies (Algeria) - 26/08/2025 01:18
- Valorization of clay-based mining wastes from Oued El Aneb marble quarry for terracotta production - 26/08/2025 01:18
- A method for preventing methane explosions when mining gas-saturated coal seams - 26/08/2025 01:18
- Improving the distribution methodology for oil and gas-bearing local structures into con- and post-sedimentation - 26/08/2025 01:18
- Economic assessment of hydrocarbon resources and enhancement of the efficiency of geological exploration in the Ustyurt region - 26/08/2025 01:18




Archive