Fit selection and life forecasting of work of movable joints of hydraulic props of powered supports
- Details
- Category: Geotechnical and mining mechanical engineering, machine building
- Last Updated on 29 June 2019
- Published on 16 June 2019
- Hits: 3516
Authors:
G.S.Zhetessova, Dr. Sc. (Tech.), Prof., orcid.org/0000-0001-6504-3405, Karaganda State Technical University, Karaganda, the Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
O.M.Zharkevich, Cand. Sc. (Tech.), Assoc. Prof., orcid.org/0000-0002-4249-4710, Karaganda State Technical University, Karaganda, the Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
O.A.Nurzhanova, orcid.org/0000-0002-0984-9284, Karaganda State Technical University, Karaganda, the Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
D.S.Zhunuspekov, orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-738X, Karaganda State Technical University, Karaganda, the Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract:
Purpose. To determine dependencies of structural parameters taking into account the impact of dynamic processes and the phenomenon of wear in movable joints of hydraulic props of powered supports to increase the life of their work.
Methodology. In this work, the method of analogues and the calculation method were used during fit selection, dimensional analysis was used when developing a gap formation scheme in a piston joint of a hydraulic prop of a powered support. The least squares method was used to determine the empirical dependence of movable joints of hydraulic props of powered supports on the minimum structural gap and assurance coefficient of joint mobility.
Findings. A technique was developed that enables to forecast the life of movable joints and hydraulic props, in general, depending on the quality of production, operating conditions and materials of parts. Recommendations were developed that increase the efficiency of hydraulic props of powered supports.
Originality. Expressions were obtained to determine the minimum and maximum structural gaps in movable joints of hydraulic props, taking into account the wave dynamics of rock bursts and the wear of surfaces of conjugated parts during friction contacts in the work process of powered supports.
Practical value. A procedure was developed to calculate the structural gap for forecasting the operational life of movable joints of hydraulic props.
References.
l. Kuznetsov, V. V. (2015). Rock bump – the reason of methane out burst in the coal mine? Bulletin KRASEC. Phys. & Math. Sci, 10(1), 30-38. DOI: 10.18454/2313-0156-2015-10-1-30-38.
2. Jixiong Zhang, Baiyi Li, Nan Zhou, & Qiang Zhang. (2016). Application of solid backfilling to reduce hard-roof caving and longwall coal face burst potential. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 88, 197-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.07.025.
3. Baranov, S. G., Vlasenko, D. S., & Loginov, M. A. (2011). Dynamics of manifestation of rock pressure in the processing of flat coal seams with heavy roofs. Journal of mining institute, 190, 26-30.
4. Xuewen Wanga, Zhaojian Yanga, Jiling Fengb, & Hunju Liua. (2013). Stress analysis and stability analysis on doubly-telescopic prop of hydraulic support. Engineering Failure Analysis, 32, 274-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.04.006.
5. Buyalich, G. D., Buyalich, К. G., & Voevodin, V. V. (2016). Radial Strains of Double-layer Cylinders in Hydraulic Props of Powered Supports. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 127, 1-7 DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/127/1/012034.
6. Zhetessova, G. S., Zharkevich, O. M., Buzauova, T. M., & Pleshakova, Ye. A. (2013). Damage to the hydrovlic racks of mechanized supports and methods for their elimination. Bulletin of the KazNTU, 1, 84-89.
7. Zhukov, I. A. (2008). Modification of the differential equations of the wave theory of longitudinal collision of rods. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University, 313(2), 5-9.
8. Shahar Berger, G. Ben-Dor, & Oren Sadot. (2015). Numerical Investigation of Shock Wave Attenuation by Dynamic Barriers. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 137(4), DOI: 10.1115/1.4028875.
9. Sung-Jae Kim, Weoncheol Koo, & Min-Jae Shin. (2018). Numerical and experimental study on a hemispheric point-absorber-type wave energy converter with a hydraulic power take-off system Renewable Energy. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.09.097.
10. Tuna Eren. (2018). Kick tolerance calculations for drilling operations Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 171, 558-569 DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.07.077.
11. Buyalich, G. D., Buyalich, K. G., & Voyevodin, V. V. (2015). Radial deformations of working cylinder of hydraulic Legs depending on their extension. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (pp.1-7). DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/91/1/012087.
12. Zia, U.A., & Baqai, A.A. (2014). Washin Akram. Effect of Surface Roughness and Temperature on EHL for Parallel Surfaces Subjected to High Acceleration. Tribology in Industry, 36(2), 144-154.
13. Aimin Liang, Yuwen Li, Hongyu Liang, Liwei Ni, & Junyan Zhang. (2017). A favorable chromium coating electrodeposited from Cr(III) electrolyte reveals anti-wear performance similar to conventional hard chromium. Materials Letters, 189, 221-224.
14. ISO 286-2:2010 Basic norms of interchangeability. Geometrical product specifications. ISO code system for tolerances on linear sizes. Part 2: Tables of standard tolerance classes and limit deviations for holes and shafts (n.d.). Retrieved from http://bsfsh.com/upload/file/20160601/20160601095795959595.pdf.