Науковий вісник НГУ

Bench testing of a steel yielding frame support

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Geotechnical and mining mechanical engineering, machine building

Last Updated on 18 September 2018

Published on 27 August 2018

Hits: 4114

Authors:

Yu. M. Khalymendyk,  Dr. Sc. (Tech.), Prof., orcid.org/0000-0003-3308-0783, National Mining University, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

V. Yu. Khalymendyk, orcid.org/0000-0002-0041-0283, National Mining University, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

L. M. Zakharova,  Cand. Sc. (Tech.),  orcid.org/0000-0003-2135-5567, Institute for Physics of Mining Processes NAS Ukraine, Dnipro, Ukraine

V. V. Nazimko,  Dr. Sc. (Tech.) Prof., orcid.org/0000-0003-3154-2745, Institute for physics of mining processes, Mykolaiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract:

The problem of stability maintenance for underground workings becomes more urgent as the depth of mining increases. Currently, combination of rock bolts or cables and steel frames has become popular among practitioners. Manufacturer use such support for providing entry stabilities in complex geologic environments. However, the number of publication concerning testing of steel frame yielding support is limited, especially benchmark testing when parameters of the frame are controlled in laboratory and may be monitored comprehensively.

Purpose. To establish variation regularities of resistance and steel yielding arches during its benchmark testing.

Methodology. Methods are based on thermodynamics of irreversible processes and consideration of interactions of the adjacent frames and their elements when under the ground pressure. We employed the probability theory and mathematical statistics to investigate these regularities.

Findings. It was found that fluctuations of the frames resistance and their yielding provide a lot of important information concerning non-linear behavior of metal support systems. We have done spectral and correlation analysis to investigate parameters of the fluctuations and proved that the yielding occurs in an anti-phase mode.

Originality. It was the first time when spectral characteristics of the frame resistance and yielding fluctuation have been determined as well as the fact that resistance of adjacent frames and their structural elements is realized in an anti-phase mode.

Practicalvalue. Necessity to improve frame support systems by decreasing the fluctuation period of resistance to ground pressure and yielding was substantiated. Possible range of fluctuation of yielding and resistance were justified.

References.

1. Pivnyak, G. G. and Shashenko, A. N., 2015. Inno­va­ti­ons and safety for coal mines inUkraine. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 6(150), pp. 118‒121.

2. Prusek, S., Lubosik, Z., Dvorsky, P. and Horak, P., 2012. Gateroad Support in the Czech and Polish Coal Mining Industry – Present State and Future Developments. In: Proc. 30^th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining. WVU, Morgantown [online],  pp. 101‒111. Available at: <https://icgcm.confe­renceacademy.com/ papers/allpapers.aspx> [Accessed 17 September 2017].

3. Renshu, Y., Yongliang, L., Dongming, G., Lan, Y., Tong­mao, Y. and Taotao, L., 2017. Failure mechanism and control technology of water-immersed roadway in high-stress and soft rock in a deep mine. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 27, pp.  245–252.

4. Zhibiao, G., Jiong, W. and Yuelin, Z., 2015. Failure mechanism and supporting measures for large deformation of Tertiary deep soft rock. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 25, pp. 121–126.

5. Stahlmann, J., Missal, C. and Edel, T., 2013. Geotechnical conditions at the Konrad mine – Excavation of drifts and rooms in squeezing rock. Geotechnische Bedingungen in der Schachtanlage Konrad – Auffahrung von Strecken und Kammern in druckhaftem Gebirge. Mining Report, 150(5), pp. 250–338. DOI: 10.1002/mire.201400029.

6. Ma, K.J. and Stankus, J., 2018. Case Study and Design of Steel Set Support for Aged Belt Entry Rehabilitation, International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 28(1), pp. 101‒106. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.12.025.

7.  Batchler, T., 2017. Ten Factors About Standing Supports That Might Surprise You. In: Proc. 36^th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining, WVU, Morgantown [online], pp. 115‒120. Available at: <http://smemi.personifycloud.com/PersonifyEbusiness/Default.aspx?TabID=251&productId=1840324> [Accessed 4 December 2017].

8. Xie, W. and Wang, X., 2015. Structural Stability of U–Steel Frame and Its Control Technology. In: Proc. 34^th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining. WVU, Morgantown [online], pp. 108‒114. Available at: <http://smemi.personifycloud.com/PersonifyEbusiness/Default.aspx?TabID=251&productId=1840324> [Accessed 4 December 2017].

9. Kompanets, V. F., 2000. Protocol of bench testing of yielding frame support AP3 having section area of 13.8 m². Donetsk: DonUGI.

10. Kondepudi, D. and Prigogin, I., 2015. Modern thermodynamics: from heat engines to dissipative structures. 2^nd ed. John Wiley and Sons; XXVI, 524.

11. Griniov, V., Zakharova, L., Diedich, I. and Na­zym­ko, V., 2017. Distant interaction of rock mass clusters around underground opening. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 11(2), pp. 43‒46.

12. Nazimko, V. V. and Zakharova, L. M., 2017. Cluster behavior of the ground during its irreversible movement. Acta geodynamica et geomaterialia, 14(188), pp. 45‒49.

13. Zakharova, L., 2017. Generating of dissipative structures during ground irreversible movement. Transactions of Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostrohradskyi National University, 8(105), pp. 118‒122.

 повний текст / full article

• < Prev
• Next >