Науковий вісник НГУ

Lithochemistry of metaclastogenic sediments of upper Paleoproterozoic of Krivoy Rog iron ore basin on aspects of paleogeographic and paleotectonic conditions of formation

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Geology

Last Updated on 11 October 2015

Published on 11 October 2015

Hits: 4064

Authors:

V.V. Pokalyuk, Cand. Sci. (Geol.-Min.), Senior Research Fellow, State Institution “Institute of Environmental Geochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine.

V.V. Sukach, Cand. Sci. (Geol.), Senior Research Fellow, Institute of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Ore Formation of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Abstract:

Purpose. The aim of the present study was to determine paleogeographic and paleogeodynamic features of sedimentogenesis of sandstone-siltstone associations of upper Paleoproterozoic of Kryvoy Rog iron ore basin based on lithochemical data. The main tasks were to investigate the lithochemical structure of the geological data, reconstruct the source mineral composition of metasedimentary rock, and compare the results with non-metamorphosed analogs.

Methodology. Multivariate statistic methods for clustering the data were employed, including the principle of serial comparison with non-metamorphosed analogs by a number of lithochemical coefficients and diagrams.

Findings. Metasedimentary formations of Gleevatsky suite of Kryvoy Rog iron ore basin were attributed to poorly differentiated subgreywacke and greywacke sandstone-siltstone rock association, which is characterized by intermediate petrochemical parameters between humid and arid terrigenous Phanerozoic series. Sedimentation was formed due to erosion of protolytes of plagiogranitoids of Archean base and earlier sediments of Paleoproterozoic cover. Tectonically active semiarid basin conditions of sedimentation are thought to be present.

Originality. The set of elementary lithochemical clusters characterizing granulometric and chemical spectrum of metasediments of Gleevatsky suite was determined. Lithochemical types of upper Paleoproterozoic of Kryvoy Rog iron ore basin were specified.

Practical value. Research contribute to improving lithochemical systematic of metasedimental rocks of Krivoy Rog iron ore basin. The determined lithochemical features of the rocks can be an important criterion for the correlation of stratified Early Precambrian complexes of Ukraine and other shields. 

References:

1. Интерпретация геохимических данных / [Скляров Е.В., Гладкочуб Д.П., Донская Т.В. и др.]; под ред. Е.В. Склярова. – М.: Интермет Инжиниринг, 2001. –288 с.

Sklyarov, Ye.V., Gladkochub, D.P. and Donskaya, T.V. (2001), Intespretatsyya geokhimicheskikh dannykh [Interpretation of Geochemical Data], Intermet Engineering, Moscow, Russia.

2. Юдович Я.Э. Основы литохимии / Юдович Я.Э, Кетрис М.П. – СПб.: Наука, 2000. – 479 с.

Yudovich, Ya.E. and Ketris, M.P. (2000), Osnovy litokhimii [Basic Lithochemistry], Nauka, Sankt-Peterbourg, Russia.

3. Седиментация в раннем докембрии: типы осадков, метаморфизованные осадочные бассейны, эволюция те- рригенных отложений / [Розен О.М., Аббясов А.А., Аксаментова Н.В. и др.] – М.: Научный мир, 2006. – 400 с

4. К вопросу о стратиграфической принадлежности образований глееватской свиты в Криворожской структуре (предложения по уточнению стратиграфической схемы УЩ) / Н.С. Курлов, В.В. Захаров, В.К. Бутырин [и др.] // Геологія і магматизм докембрію Українського щита. – 2000. – С. 48–50.

Kurlov, N.S., Zakharov, V.V., and Butyrin, V.K. (2000), “About stratigraphic affiliation of Gleevatsky suite in Kryvoy Rog structure (suggestions for specification of the Ukrainian shield stratigraphic scheme)”, Heologiia i Mahmatyzm Dokembriiu Ukrainskoho Shchyta, Kyiv, pp. 48–50.

5. Кореляційна хроностратиграфічна схема раннього докембрію Українського щита / [Єсипчук К.Ю., Бобров О.Б., Степанюк Л.М. та ін.] – К.: УкрДГРІ, 2004. – 30 с.

Yesipchuk, K.Yu., Bobrov, O.B. and Stepaniuk, L.M. (2004), Korreliatsiina khronostratyhrafichna schema rannioho dokembriiu Ukrainskoho Shchyta [Correlation Chronostratigraphic Scheme of Early Pre-Cambrian of Ukrainian Shield], UkrDGRI, Kyiv, Ukraine.

6. Криворожская сверхглубокая скважина СГ-8 / [Курлов Н.С., Шеремет Е.М., Козарь Н.А. и др.] – Донецк: Ноулидж, 2011. – 556 с.

Kurlov, N.S, Sheremet, Ye.M., Kozar, N.A. (2011), Krivorozhskaya sverkhglubokaya skvazhyna “Kryvoy Rog Ultradeep Well CG-8”, Knowledge, Donetsk, Ukraine.

7. Глееватские метаконгломераты Кривбасса – континентальные молассы или мелководно-бассейновые отложения? / Е.А. Кулиш, В.В. Покалюк, Н.С. Курлов, Ю.П. Мечников // Геохимия та екологія. Збірник наукових праць Институту геохімії навколишнього середовища. – 2010. – Вып.18. – С. 7–26.

Kulish, Ye.A., Pokalyuk, V.V., Kurlov, N.S. and Mechnikov, Yu.P. (2010), “Gleevatsky metaconglomerates of Kryvoy Rog iron ore basin – continental molassas or shallow-water basin deposits?”, Geokhimiya i Ekologiya. Collection of research works of Institute of Environmental Geochemistry, Kyiv, Issue 18, pp. 7–26.

8. Condie, K.C. (1993), “Chemical composition and evolution of the upper continental crust: contrasting results from surface samples and shales”, Chem. Geol., vol. 104, pp. 1–37.

9. Паранько И.С. Метаконгломератовая и метапесчаниково-сланцевая формации верхней части разреза Криворожской структуры (глееватская свита). Статья 2. Особенности происхождения формаций / И.С. Паранько, Г.М. Яценко // Геологический журнал – 1990. – № 5. – С. 124–130.

Paranko, I.S. and Yatsenko, G.M. (1990), “Metaconglomerate and meta-sandstone-slate formation of the upper section of Kryvoy Rog structure (Gleevatsky suite). Article 2. Formation origin characteristics”, Geologicheskiy Zhurnal, no. 5, pp. 124–130.

10. Rosen, O.M., Abbyasov, A.A., and Tipper, J.C. (2004), “MINLITH – an experience-based algorithm for estimating the likely mineralogical compositions of sedimentary rocks from bulk chemical analyses”, Computers & Geosciences, 2004, vol. 30, pp. 647–661.

2015_02_pokalyuk
2015-10-10  1.38 MB  1135

• < Prev
• Next >