Науковий вісник НГУ

Green technologies in the design of single-storey frameworks

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №3 2025

Last Updated on 25 June 2025

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 740

Authors:

A.V.Radkevych, orcid.org/0000-0001-6325-8517, Zhejiang Guangsha Vocational and Technical University of Construction, Dongyang, the People’s Republic of China; Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

D.O.Bannikov*, orcid.org/0000-0002-9019-9679, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

H.Wu, orcid.org/0000-0003-0857-6883, Zhejiang Guangsha Vocational and Technical University of Construction, Dongyang, the People’s Republic of China, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

R.Lv, orcid.org/0009-0000-6906-7578, Zhejiang Guangsha Vocational and Technical University of Construction, Dongyang, the People’s Republic of China, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

L.I.Klochko, orcid.org/0009-0009-3478-6076, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2025, (3): 099 - 106

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2025-3/099

Abstract:

Purpose. Analysis of the effectiveness of long-span structural systems based on glued laminated timber for a single-storey frame of a public building.

Methodology. The study used a set of research methods, including scientific analysis and synthesis of available technical information on the use of modern wood products for the design of load-bearing frames of buildings with large spans. Computer modelling methods based on the numerical method of structural mechanics – the finite element method – were also used. The analysis of the structural options was performed using the finite element method using the SCAD (Ukraine) design and computing complex. A separate area of work involved design development, which included methods of engineering assessment of the accuracy and reliability of the results obtained, as well as the execution of design documentation.

Findings. For the considered structural variants of the equipment compartment frame covering, stress-strain state patterns, as well as natural frequency spectra and vibration modes, were obtained. The structural variant of the frame recommended for practical implementation is based on the set of technical and economic indicators involves the use of an arched covering system. It is also shown that the use of biocomposite glued beams opens up reserves for reducing the material consumption of the structure by preliminary estimates up to 25 %.

Originality. The conducted research studies allowed estimating in complex the static and dynamic load-bearing capacity of a large-span frame using glued laminated timber. The high efficiency of the combined frame system, especially in the case of biocomposite timber, has been proven. The obtained frequency spectrum is discrete and lies in the lower frequency range of 1.5‒5.0 Hz.

Practical value. The use of glued and biocomposite timber beams for load-bearing elements of single-storey frames opens up a direction of green technologies for specialized buildings, such as a Fire Station. In combination with modern finishing materials such as fire-resistant wood wool, this allows increasing the operational qualities of wooden structures.

Keywords: wood, glued laminated timber, biocomposite laminated timber, load-bearing framework, equipment compartment

References.

1. Travush, V., Emelianov, S., Kolchunov, V., & Bulgakov, A. (2016). Mechanical safety and survivability of buildings and building structures under different loading types and impacts. Procedia Engineering, 164, 416-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.639

2. Jkhsi, Sh. (2020). Evaluation of risk and safety in building structures under construction. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Sciences and Applications, 1(4), 24-28. https://doi.org/10.47346/ijaesa.v1i4.43

3. Zheng, Z., Su, Yi., Liu, J., Zhou, Zh., & Wang, X. (2024). Optimization study on stakeholder capability configuration in green construction. Buildings, 14, 3135. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103135

4. Wang, J., Wang, Ji., Liu, B., & Gu, H. (2024). Research on the evaluation and analysis method of green construction of substation project. E3S Web of Conferences, 561, 02003. https://doi.org/0.1051/e3sconf/202456102003

5. Pati, V. A., Wadalkar, Sh., Kale, V., Sawant, R., & Joshi, D. A. (2024). Optimizing sustainable construction costs: A Green Building Approach for Residential Development. E3S Web of Conferences, 559, 04034. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202455904034

6. Sviatohorov, I. (2024). Application of geotechnical structures in “green construction”. Environmental safety and nature management, 2(50), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2024.2.36-47

7. Tienthavorn, T. (2024). Exploring sustainable conservation: A case study on the transformation of knockdown wooden houses in Thailand. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies, 22(1), 268705. https://doi.org/10.56261/jars.v22.268705

8. Kossakowski, P. G. (2024). New Advances in Strengthening of Structural Timber. Materials, 17(11), 2545. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17112545

9. Dmytrenko, A., Dmytrenko, T., Derkach, T., & Klochko, L. (2018). Experimental investigation and computer-generated simulation of reinforced double-tee girders with a wall of oriented standard board. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.8), 115-119. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.8.27224

10.      Dezhin, M., & Ibragimov, A. (2024). Development of constructive solutions for interfaces of wooden beams and CLT. E3S Web of Conferences, 533, 02003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202453302003

11.      Das, A. K., Islam, Md. N., Ghosh, C. K., & Ghosh, R. K. (2023). Physical and mechanical properties of Albizia procera glulam beam. Heliyon, 9, e18383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18383

12.      Wei, P. X., Wang, B. J., Li, H., Wang, L. B., Peng, S., & Zhang, L. (2019). A comparative study of compression behaviors of cross-laminated timber and glued-laminated timber columns. Construction and Building Materials, 222(20), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.139

13.      Dezhin, M., & Ibragimov, A. (2023). Improving the reliability of the joints of wooden elements on metal linings. E3S Web of Conferences, 402, 10005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340210005

14.      Faria, D. L., Cruz, T. M., Dias, M. C., Mendes, M. C., & Guimaraes, J. B. (2020). Physical and mechanical behavior of glulam beams produced with rubberwood treated with preservatives. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 44, 012020. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-7054202044012020

15.      Bergamin, R. V., Mascia, N. T., Dodadon, B. F., & Trautwein, L. M. (2020). Experimental investigation of glued-laminated timber beams with Vectran-FRP reinforcement. Engineering Structures, 202(1), 109818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109818

16.      Martynov, V., Myasnikov, D., & Roshchina, S. (2024). Investigation of the strength and deformability of glued wooden beams with lamellas made of thermally damaged (Pinus sylvestris L.) wood based on experimental planning. Forestry Engineering Journal, 14(1), 170-189. https://doi.org/10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2024.1/10

17.      Sotiriadis, K., Guzii, S., Mácová, P., Viani, A., Dvořák, K., & Drdacky, M. (2019). Thermal behavior of an intumescent alkaline aluminosilicate composite material for fire protection of structural elements. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 6(31), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002702

18.      Tsapko, Yu., Bondarenko, O., Tsapko, O., Gorbachova, A., Mazurchuk, S., & Zherebchuk, D. (2023). Functional assignment of technological accessories for woodworking. Ways to Improve Construction Efficiency, 51, 206-217. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2023.51(1).206-217

19.      Kashytskyi, V. P., Sadova, O. L., Zabolotnyi, O. V., Malets, V. M., & Mazurok, V. S. (2022). Development of biocomposites filled with products of recycling of secondary raw materials of plant origin. Visnyk of Vinnytsia Polytechnical Institute, 1, 95-102. https://doi.org/10.31649/1997-9266-2022-160-1-95-102

20.      Bannikov, D. O., Radkevich, A. V., & Nikiforova, N. A. (2019). Features of the design of steel frame structures in India for seismic areas. Materials Science Forum, 968, 348-354. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.968.348

21.      Bofang, Z. (2018). The finite element method: fundamentals and applications in civil, hydraulic, mechanical and aeronautical engineering. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons Singapore Pte. Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119107323

22.      Zienkiewicz, O. C., Taylor, R. L., & Fox, D. D. (2014). The finite element method for solid and structural mechanic. 7 ^th edition. Elsevier LTD. Retrieved from URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9781856176347/the-finite-element-method-for-solid-and-structural-mechanics

23.      Fialko, S., & Karpilovskyi, V. (2018). Time history analysis formulation in SCAD FEA software. Journal of Measurements in Enginee­ring, 6, 4, 173-180. https://doi.org/10.21595/jme.2018.20408

24.      Hezentsvei, Y., & Bannikov, D. (2020). Effectiveness evaluation of steel strength improvement for pyramidal-prismatic bunkers. EUREKA, Physics and Engineering, 2020(2), 30-38. https://doi.org/
10.21303/2461-4262.2020.001146

25.      Bannikov, D., Tiutkin, O., Hezentsvei, Y., & Muntian, A. (2024). Controlling the dynamic characteristics of steel bunker containers for bulk materials. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1348(1), 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1348/1/012002

26.      Bannikov, D., & Yakovliev, S. (2020). Development of dynamic integral evaluation method of technical state of one-section electric locomotive body. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(7-103), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.192468

27.      Bannikov, D., Radkevich, A., & Muntian, A. (2020). Modernization of the buffer beam of PE2U traction unit electric locomotive. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 985(1), 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/985/1/012035

• < Prev
• Next >