Науковий вісник НГУ

Analytical justification of the thermochemical interaction between blast reagents and carbon-containing products under the influence of magnetic fields

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №5 2024

Last Updated on 29 October 2024

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 1508

Authors:

V.H.Lozynskyi*, orcid.org/0000-0002-9657-0635, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

V.S.Falshtynskyi, orcid.org/0000-0002-3104-1089, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2024, (5): 030 - 036

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2024-5/030

Abstract:

Purpose. To justify and develop a model that describes the effect of magnetic treatment of blast reagents and carbon-containing products on the gasification process for predicting the intensification of gas formation.

Methodology. The study involves theoretical modeling based on experimental data to investigate the influence of magnetic fields on the underground coal gasification process and co-gasification of coal and carbon-containing products. The Arrhenius equation was used to estimate the rate constants of gasification reactions in the temperature range of 800–1,000 °C. The effect of the magnetic field was incorporated by adjusting the activation energy (E_a). The results of analytical and experimental studies were processed using methods of computer and mathematical modeling.

Findings. The results show that the application of magnetic fields significantly intensifies the gasification process of carbon containing products. Increasing the reactivity of the blast reagents, particularly water and oxygen, leads to a higher overall yield of combustible gases. The use of magnetic fields in the gasification process substantially increases the reaction rate (k) due to the reduction in activation energy (E_a), improving the overall efficiency of gasification.

Originality. For the first time, an analytical model has been developed to describe the effect of magnetic treatment of blast reagents and carbon-containing products on the gasification process in the temperature range of 800–1,000 °C. The obtained reaction rates follow an exponential trend. The established and correlation-validated pattern shows the relationship between changes in the approximation coefficient (F ) and the change in the carbon fraction (C, %) during the magnetic treatment of blast components within the specified temperature range.

Practical value. The results of this study can be applied to enhance the efficiency of industrial gasification processes, particularly underground coal gasification and co-gasification of coal and carbon-containing productss.

Keywords: magnetic field, gasification, underground coal gasification, сo-gasification thermochemical interaction, syngas, intensification

References.

1. Gajdzik, B., Wolniak, R., Nagaj, R., Žuromskaitė-Nagaj, B., & Grebski, W. W. (2024). The influence of the global energy crisis on energy efficiency: A comprehensive analysis. Energies, 17(4), 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17040947.

2. Farghali, M., Osman, A. I., Mohamed, I. M., Chen, Z., Chen, L., Ihara, I., & Rooney, D. W. (2023). Strategies to save energy in the context of the energy crisis: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 21(4), 2003-2039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01591-5.

3. Salieiev, I. (2024). Organization of processes for complex mining and processing of mineral raw materials from coal mines in the context of the concept of sustainable development. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 18(1), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.33271/mining18.01.054.

4. Bissengaliyeva, А. М., Dyussegalieva, К. О., & Kydyrbek, R. Y. (2021). Influence of radioactive emissions on the environmental situation of the western region. Engineering Journal of Satbayev University, 143(6), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.51301/vest.su.2021.i6.04.

5. Sai, K. S., Petlovanyi, M. V., & Malashkevych, D. S. (2023). A new approach to producing a prospective energy resource based on coalmine methane. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1254(1), 012068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1254/1/012068.

6. Takyi, S. A., Zhang, Y., Si, M., Zeng, F., Li, Y., & Tontiwachwuthikul, P. (2023). Current status and technology development in implementing low carbon emission energy on underground coal gasification (UCG). Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, 1051417. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.1051417.

7. Su, F. Q., He, X. L., Dai, M. J., Yang, J. N., Hamanaka, A., Yu, Y. H., & Li, J. Y. (2023). Estimation of the cavity volume in the gasification zone for underground coal gasification under different oxygen flow conditions. Energy, 285, 129309.

8. Smith, E. K., Barakat, S. M., Akande, O., Ogbaga, C. C., Okoye,  P. U., & Okolie, J. A. (2023). Subsurface combustion and gasification for hydrogen production: Reaction mechanism, techno-economic and lifecycle assessment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 148095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.148095.

9. Lozynskyi, V., Falshtynskyi, V., Kozhantov, A., Kieush, L., & Saik, P. (2024). Increasing the underground coal gasification efficiency using preliminary electromagnetic coal mass heating. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1348(1), 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1348/1/012045.

10. Lozynskyi, V., Falshtynskyi, V., Saik, P., Dychkovskyi, R., Zhautikov, B., & Cabana, E. (2022). Use of magnetic fields for intensification of coal gasification process. Rudarsko-geološko-Naftni Zbornik, 37(5), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.17794/rgn.2022.5.6.

11. Otto, C., & Kempka, T. (2020). Synthesis gas composition prediction for underground coal gasification using a thermochemical equilibrium modeling approach. Energies, 13(5), 1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13051171.

12. Lozynskyi, V. (2023). Critical review of methods for intensifying the gas generation process in the reaction channel during underground coal gasification (UCG). Mining of Mineral Deposits, 17(3), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.33271/mining17.03.067.

13. Khan, H., Adeyemi, I., & Janajreh, I. (2024). Synergistic Effects of the Co-gasification of Solid Recovered Fuel and Coal Blend Using Entrained Flow Technology. Waste Biomass Valor, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-024-02588-z.

14. Kipriyanov, A. A. Jr., & Purtov, P. A. (2012). Prediction of a Strong Effect of a Wek Magnetic Field on Diffusion Assisted Reactions in Non Equilibrium Conditions. Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, 33(3), 1009-1014. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2012.33.3.1009.

15. Hu, L., Xia, G., & Chen, Q. (2019). Magnetochemistry and chemical synthesis. Chinese Physics B, 28(3), 037102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/28/3/037102.

16. Westsson, E., Picken, S., & Koper, G. (2020). The Effect of Magnetic Field on Catalytic Properties in Core-Shell Type Particles. Frontiers in Chemistry, (8), 163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00163.

17. Barmina, I., Zake, M., Krishko, V., & Gedrovics, M. (2010). Modification of Wood Pellets and Propane Co-firing in a Magnetic Field. Scientific Journal of Riga Technical University. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/v10145-010-0012-9.

18. Barmina, I., Zake, M., Strautins, U., & Marinaki, M. (2017). Effects of gradient magnetic field on swirling flame dynamics. Engineering for Rural Development, 148-154. https://doi.org/10.22616/erdev2017.16.n025.

19. Otto, C., & Kempka, T. (2020). Synthesis gas composition prediction for underground coal gasification using a thermochemical equilibrium modeling approach. Energies, 13(5), 1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13051171.

20. Wiatowski, M., Basa, W., Pankiewicz-Sperka, M., Szyja, M., Thomas, H. R., Zagorscak, R., & Kapusta, K. (2024). Experimental study on tar formation during underground coal gasification: Effect of coal rank and gasification pressure on tar yield and chemical composition. Fuel, 357, 130034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130034.

21. Saik, P., & Berdnyk, M. (2022). Mathematical model and methods for solving heat-transfer problem during underground coal gasification. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 16(2), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.33271/mining16.02.087.

22. Yesmakhanova, L. N., Tulenbayev, M. S., Chernyavskaya, N. P., Beglerova, S. T., Kabanbayev, A. B., Abildayev, A. A., & Maussymbayeva, A. D. (2021). Simulating the coal dust combustion process with the use of the real process parameters. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 16(22), 2395-2407.

23. Bazaluk, O., Lozynskyi, V., Falshtynskyi, V., Saik, P., Dychkovskyi, R., & Cabana, E. (2021). Experimental Studies of the Effect of Design and Technological Solutions on the Intensification of an Underground Coal Gasification Process. Energies, 14(14), 4369. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144369.

24. Kačur, J., Laciak, M., Durdán, M., Flegner, P., & Frančáková, R. (2023). A review of research on advanced control methods for underground coal gasification processes. Energies, 16(8), 3458. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083458.

25. Meetham, G. W. (2018). Requirements for and factors affecting high temperature capability: Part A of ‘The Requirements for the Limitations of Materials at High Temperatures’. Materials & Design, 9(5), 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3069(88)90001-5.

26. Giliberti, M., & Lovisetti, L. (2024). Pauli Exclusion Principle. In Old Quantum Theory and Early Quantum Mechanics: A Historical Perspective Commented for the Inquiring Reader, 353-393. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

27. Sztenkiel, D. (2023). Spin orbital reorientation transitions induced by magnetic field. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 572, 170644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170644.

28. Wang, Y., Mehmood, N., Hou, Z., Mi, W., Zhou, G., Gao, X., & Liu, J. (2022). Electric Field-Driven Rotation of Magnetic Vortex Originating from Magnetic Anisotropy Reorientation. Advanced Electronic Materials, 8(6), 2100561. https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202100561.

29. Li, P., Jiang, Y., Hu, Y., Men, Y., Liu, Y., Cai, W., & Chen, S. (2022). Hydrogen bond network connectivity in the electric double layer dominates the kinetic pH effect in hydrogen electrocatalysis on Pt. Nature Catalysis, 5(10), 900-911. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-022-00846-8.

30. Luo, S., Elouarzaki, K., & Xu, Z.J. (2022). Electrochemistry in magnetic fields. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 61(27), e202203564. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202203564.

31. Fang, H., Li, S., Ge, T., Liu, Y., Yu, Y., Liu, Y., & Li, L. (2024). Effects of the steam-to-oxygen ratio and the equivalence ratio on underground coal gasification. Combustion Science and Technology, 196(15), 3514-3526. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2023.2177509.

32. Huang, W. G., Wang, Z. T., Duan, T. H., & Xin, L. (2021). Effect of oxygen and steam on gasification and power generation in industrial tests of underground coal gasification. Fuel, 289, 119855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119855.

• < Prev
• Next >