Науковий вісник НГУ

Prediction of coal seam occurrence using numerical methods and a three-dimensional geoinformation system

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 1

PoorBest 

Details

Parent Category: 2025

Category: Content №5 2025

Created on 25 October 2025

Last Updated on 25 October 2025

Published on 30 November -0001

Written by D. S. Malashkevych, V. V. Ruskykh, V. Yu. Medianyk, O. A. Haidai

Hits: 1742

Authors:

D. S. Malashkevych*, orcid.org/0000-0002-8494-2489, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

V. V. Ruskykh, orcid.org/0000-0002-5615-2797, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine

V. Yu. Medianyk, orcid.org/0000-0001-5403-5338, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine

O. A. Haidai, orcid.org/0000-0003-0825-0023, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2025, (5): 005 - 013

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2025-5/005

Abstract:

Purpose. Development and application of a methodology for predicting the occurrence of a coal seam using numerical interpolation methods and three-dimensional geoinformation modeling.

Methodology. The study is based on geological exploration data of the c ₄² coal seam at the “Samarska” mine. Numerical interpolation methods and three-dimensional modeling in AutoCAD 3D were used. Based on geological data, a digital terrain model of the seam’s floor was constructed, and its thickness and variations across the area were determined. Using mathematical methods, an analysis of thinning and thickening zones of the seam was carried out, allowing for the estimation of coal extraction volumes, waste rock yield, and the operational ash content of coal.

Findings. As a result of the study, a three-dimensional model of the c ₄² coal seam of the “Samarska” mine was developed and its geological thickness was determined. Areas of thinning and thickening of the seam were identified, which made it possible to optimize the location of extraction pillars and preparatory workings. Volumes of coal to be mined and waste rock to be cut were calculated. The estimated operational ash content of coal was determined to be 34.4 %, which is an important factor for controlling the quality of the extracted product. The data obtained made it possible to optimize the parameters of cleaning operations, adapting the technological process to the geological conditions of the coal seam.

Originality. The article proposes an improved approach to predicting coal seam occurrence using numerical interpolation and three-dimensional modeling, adapted to conditions with limited geological data. For the first time, a step-by-step construction with dynamic uprating of seam geometry is implemented, enhancing the accuracy of reserve estimation and the efficiency of mining design.

Practical value. The developed methodology makes it possible to minimize exploration costs, improve the reserve estimation accuracy, reduce risks, and optimize mining operations. The results can be used to design production technology for other mines in Western Donbas, contributing to increased mining efficiency.

Keywords: prediction, coal seam, three-dimensional modeling, interpolation, geological thickness, extraction

References.

1. Buzylo, V., Pavlychenko, A., & Borysovska, O. (2020). Ecological aspects of filling of worked-out area during underground coal mining. E3S Web of Conferences, (201), 01038. EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/
10.1051/e3sconf/202020101038

2. Wang, G., Ren, H., Zhao, G., Zhang, D., Wen, Z., Meng, L., & Gong, S. (2022). Research and practice of intelligent coal mine technology systems in China. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 9(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-022-00491-3

3. Malashkevych, D., Petlovanyi, M., Sai, K., & Zubko, S. (2022). Research into the coal quality with a new selective mining technology of the waste rock accumulation in the mined-out area. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 16(4), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.33271/mining16.04.103

4. Bondarenko, V., Salieiev, I., Kovalevska, I., Chervatiuk, V., Malashkevych, D., Shyshov, M., & Chernyak, V. (2023).
A new concept for complex mining of mineral raw material resources from DTEK coal mines based on sustainable development and ESG strategy. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 17(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/
10.33271/mining17.01.001

5. Wang, L., Jia, B., & Su, G. (2025). Risk identification of coal and gas outburst based on improved CUOWGA weighting TOPSIS model. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00266-1

6. Malashkevych, D., Poimanov, S., Shypunov, S., & Yerisov, M. (2020). Comprehensive assessment of the mined coal quality and mining conditions in the Western Donbas mines. E3S Web of Conferences, (201), 01013. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020101013

7. Salieiev, I. (2024). Organization of processes for complex mining and processing of mineral raw materials from coal mines in the context of the concept of sustainable development. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 18(1), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.33271/mining18.01.054

8. Petlovanyi, M., Ruskykh, V., Sai, K., & Malashkevych, D. (2024). Prompt determination of predictive parameters for mining-technogenic landscape objects. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1348(1), 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1348/1/012035

9. Bondarenko, V., Kovalevs’ka, I., & Fomychov, V. (2012). Features of carrying out experiment using finite-element method at multivariate calculation of “mine massif – combined support” system. Geomechanical Processes During Underground Mining – Proceedings of the School of Underground Mining, 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1201/b13157-4

10.      Ljubić, A., & Petrović, M. (2024). Statistical analysis and mapping of imaginary coal layer using inverse distance interpolation, simple case study of recommended methods. Theory and application in geomathematics 2024: 5 ^th Croatian geomathematical scientific congress, 173-186. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/omp/index.php/rgn-unizg/catalog/view/81/52/5239

11.      Jeuken, R., Xu, C., & Dowd, P. (2020). Improving coal quality estimations with geostatistics and geophysical logs. Natural Resources Research, 29(4), 2529-2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09609-y

12.      Afzal, P. (2018). Comparing ordinary kriging and advanced inverse distance squared methods based on estimating coal deposits; case study: East-Parvadeh deposit, central Iran. Journal of Mining and Environment, 9(3), 753-760. https://doi.org/10.22044/jme.2018.6897.1522

13.      Kopacz, M., Kulpa, J., Galica, D., Dyczko, A., & Jarosz, J. (2019). Economic valuation of coal deposits – The value of geological information in the resource recognition process. Resources Policy, (63), 101450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101450

14.      Zhang, J., & Guangwei, L. (2024). Research on a Coal Seam Modeling Construction Method Based on Improved Kriging Interpolation. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4124626/v1

15.      Maxwell, K., Rajabi, M., & Esterle, J. (2021). Spatial interpolation of coal properties using geographic quantile regression forest. International Journal of Coal Geology, (248), 103869. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.coal.2021.103869

16.      Uyan, M., & Dursun, A. E. (2021). Determination and modeling of lignite reserve using geostatistical analysis and GIS. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(4), 312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06633-2

17.      Zhao, X., Hao, T., Feng, H., Li, F., & Li, X. (2025). Exploration of 3D Coal Seam Geological Modeling Visualization and Gas Content Prediction Technology Based on Borehole Data. Energy Science & Engineering, 13(3), 1117-1131. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.2048

18.      Che, D., & Jia, Q. (2019). Three-dimensional geological modeling of coal seams using weighted Kriging method and multi-source data. IEEE Access, 7, 118037-118045. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2936811

19.      Olea, R. A., Luppens, J. A., & Tewalt, S. J. (2011). Methodology for quantifying uncertainty in coal assessments with an application to a Texas lignite deposit. International Journal of Coal Geology, 85(1), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2010.10.001

20.      Unver, B. (2018). Fundamentals of 3D modelling and resource estimation in coal mining. Journal of Mining and Environment, 9(3), 623-639. https://doi.org/10.22044/jme.2018.6848.1515

21.      Jiskani, I. M., Siddiqui, F. I., & Pathan, A. G. (2018). Integrated 3D geological modeling of Sonda-Jherruck coal field, Pakistan. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 17(3), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.jsm.2018.06.001

22.      Dursun, A. E. (2023). Spatial coal seam modeling and reserve estimation using geostatistical methodologies by GIS technique in a selected coalfield in Ermenek Basin, Turkey. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 28(4), 863-877. https://doi.org/10.46544/ams.v28i4.06

23.      Lozynskyi, V., Medianyk, V., Saik, P., Rysbekov, K., & Demydov, M. (2020). Multivariance solutions for designing new levels of coal mines. Rudarsko Geolosko Naftni Zbornik, 35(2), 23-31.
https://doi.org/10.17794/rgn.2020.2.3

24.      Wanli, L., Xueliang, Z., & Shibo, W. (2020). Modeling and dynamic correction technology of 3D coal seam model for coal-mining face. Journal of China Coal Society, 45(6). https://doi.org/10.13225/
j.cnki.jccs.ZN20.0364

25.      Bartoszek, S., Stankiewicz, K., Kost, G., Ćwikła, G., & Dyczko, A. (2021). Research on Ultrasonic Transducers to Accurately Determine Distances in a Coal Mine Conditions. Energies, 14(9), 2532. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092532

26.      Dychkovskyi, R., Falshtynskyi, V., Ruskykh, V., Cabana, E., & Kosobokov, O. (2018). A modern vision of simulation modelling in mining and near mining activity. E3S Web of Conferences, (60), 00014. Retrieved from http://ir.nmu.org.ua/handle/123456789/153425

27.      Yuan, J., Liu, G., & Chai, S. (2024). 3D geological fine modeling and dynamic updating method of fault slope in open-pit coal mine. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81872-3

28.      Chen, J., He, Y., Liang, Y., Wang, W., & Duan, X. (2024). Estimation of gross calorific value of coal based on the cubist regression ­model. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 23176. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-74469-3

• Next >