Optimisation of the flotation parameters on the enrichment of phosphate ore (Algeria)
/ 2
- Details
- Parent Category: Contens №3 2019
- Category: Solid State Physics, Mineral Processing
- Created on 16 June 2019
- Last Updated on 29 June 2019
- Published on 16 June 2019
- Written by Super User
- Hits: 2271
Authors:
F. Ait Merzeg, Laboratory of Materials Technology and Process Engineering, Abderahmane Mira University, Bejaia, Algeria, Unit on Analyses and Technological Development in Environment, Scientific and Technical Research Centre in Physico-Chemical Analyses BP 384, Bou-Ismail, Algeria
N. Bezzi, Dr. Sc. (Tech.), Prof., Laboratory of Materials Technology and Process Engineering, Abderahmane Mira University, Bejaia, Algeria
Abstract:
Purpose. Treatment of the Algerian natural phosphate ore from the Jebel Onk deposit by flotation process with the use of flotation cell of the Motso Mineral Industries type (Inc. Darville, PA USA). This phosphate ore has a carbonate and silicate gangue, which negatively affects viscosity in the production of phosphoric acid.
Methodology. The experimental procedure used is based on two aspects: 1) a prior mechanical preparation of all the processes: crushing, homogenization, quartering, sieving, followed by attrition and desliming operations; 2) a preparation of reagents of different qualities followed by pulping, packaging and flotation.
Findings. We can conclude that the reverse flotation is perfectly favorable and presents an excellent economic yield. The flotation process has shown its efficiency in depressed phosphatic elements in the phosphate concentrates (flowings) as well as in floated carbonates in the carbonated wastes (floatings). Indeed, it was possible to attain the phosphate concentrate contents of nearly 31 % in P2O5 with a satisfactory recovery (85‒95 %).
Originality. Flotation tests are applied for both granulometric classes C1(40‒250µm) and C2(250‒500 m) treating a little more than 30 % of P2O5 with respect to raw sample (26 %), which allowed achieving satisfactory yields (85 to 95 %).The best yields were obtained under the following optimal conditions: the conditioning and flotation optimal time periods recorded for both classes are 10 and 8 min for class C1, whereas for class C2 they were found to be 7.5 min and 6 min, respectively. The best pH that corresponds to a higher flotation recovery for both classes is 9. The oleic acid adsorption optimal dosages on the gangue elements are 2500 and 2000 g/t for class C1 and C2, respectively.
Practical value. Different analytical techniques (XRD, XRF, FTIR) were applied for the flotation products namely: the flowings (phosphate concentrate) and the floatings (carbonated waste), which allows a new approach in the optimization of exploitation and valorization of the phosphate ores, as well as the focus of organizational chart of the treatment, aiming to provide the best quality of the phosphate concentrate.
References.
1. Birken, I., Bertucci, M., Chappelin, J., & Jorda, E. (2016). Quantification of Impurities, Including Carbonates Speciation for Phosphates Beneficiation by Flotation. Procedia Engineering, 138, 72-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.059.
2. Cao, Q., Cheng, J., Wen, S., Li, C., Bai, S., & Liu, D. (2015). A mixed collector system for phosphate flotation. Minerals Engineering, 78, 114-121. DOI:10.1016/j.mineng.2015.04.020.
3. Tuo, B., Yang, J., Han, L., Wang, J., & Yao, Y. (2016). Flotation experimental research of calcareous–siliceous phosphorite. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 146, 10-14. DOI:10.1016/j.minpro.2015.11.006.
4. Han, Y., Han, S., Kim, B., Yang, J., Choi, J., Kim, K., You, K.-S., & Kim, H. (2018). Flotation separation of quartz from apatite and surface forces in bubble–particle interactions: Role of pH and cationic amine collector contents. Journal of Industrial and Engineering .Chemistry. 107-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.09.036.
5. Kou, J., Tao, D., & Xu, G. (2010). Fatty acid collectors for phosphate flotation and their adsorption behavior using QCM-D. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 95, 1-9. DOI:10.1016/j.minpro.2010.03.001.
6. Gallala, W., Herchi, F., Ali, I. B., Abbassi, L., Gaied, M. E., & Montacer, M. (2016). Beneficiation of Phosphate Solid Coarse Waste from Redayef (Gafsa Mining Basin) by Grinding and Flotation Techniques. Procedia Engineering, 138, 85-94. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.065.
7. Kupka, N., & Rudolph, M. (2018). Froth flotation of scheelite – A review. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 28, 373-384. DOI:10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.12.001.
8. Medeiros, de A. R. S., & Baltar, C. A. M. (2018). Importance of collector chain length in flotation of fine particles. Minerals Engineering, 122, 179-184. DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2018.03.008.
9. Jovanović, I., Miljanović, I., & Jovanović, T. (2015). Soft computing-based modeling of flotation processes – A review. Minerals Engineering, 84, 34-63. DOI:10.1016/j.mineng.2015.09.020.
10. Barrozo, M. A. S., & Lobato, F. S. (2016). Multi-objective optimization of column flotation of an igneous phosphate ore.International Journal of Mineral Processing, 146, 82-89. DOI:10.1016/j.minpro.2015.12.001.
11. Muzenda, E., Member, IAENG., Ayo, S. A., Ambali, S. A., & Freeman, N., (2011, October 19-21). Effect of pH on the recovery and grade of base metal sulphides (PGMs) by flotation. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science (WCECS), San Francisco, USA, 2011. DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-4786-9_19.
12. Mukherjee, S., Mukhopadhyay, S., Pariatamby, A., Hashim, M. A., Redzwan, G., & Sen Gupta, B. (2015). Optimization of pulp fibre removal by flotation using colloidal gas aphrons generated from a natural surfactant. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 53, 15-21. DOI:10.1016/j.jtice.2015.02.037.
