Articles

Liquefaction of industrial zone against earthquake loading using laboratory and field measurements

User Rating:  / 0
PoorBest 

Authors:


Aram Mohammed Raheem*, orcid.org/0000-0002-6889-3939, Civil Engineering Department, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk, Iraq

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


повний текст / full article



Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2023, (5): 092 - 101

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2023-5/092



Abstract:



Purpose.
To assess the liquefaction of Kirkuk’s industrial region following a series of earthquakes that struck the city during the previous five years based on the current earthquake activity in the region.  


Methodology.
Initially, substantial relationships for shear wave velocity in different types of soil were collected and studied, where the majority of these correlations necessitated the use of standard penetration tests in the field. Indeed, two boreholes were drilled up to a maximum depth of 10 m, and the numbers of blows for conventional penetration tests were measured at various depths in each borehole. The stated shear wave velocity values from the literature, as well as the maximum and lowest shear wave velocity constraints, were employed in a simple technique to estimate the cyclic shear stress induced by earthquake loading.  


Findings.
Based on laboratory and field data, the safety factor against earthquake-induced liquefaction can be determined. When the worst-case scenario was examined using the suggested values of shear wave velocity, the factor of safety against earthquake was reduced by 94 % as the depth increased from 3.5 to 9 m. 


Originality.
No previous study has tried to quantify the liquefaction impact of industrial zone of Kirkuk city as such an important rich-oil area was influenced by series of earthquakes occurrence. More importantly, for the first time field soil samples from on-site boreholes in Kirkuk city have been collected and used for liquefaction assessment since such real field data can be utilized properly in liquefaction evaluation process in the absence of any comparable quantification for the investigated area.  


Practical value.
Precious liquefaction analysis should be performed prior to any proposed project construction in the light of increased earthquake activity in the industrial zone in Kirkuk city (Iraq).



Keywords:
 liquefaction, standard penetration test, earthquake, shear wave velocity, soil disturbance, factor of safety

References.


1. Tabatabaei, S.A., Esmaeili, M., & Sadeghi, J. (2019). Investigation of optimum height of railway embankments during earthquake based on their stability in liquefaction. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 23(5), 882-908. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1342301.

2. Fattah, M. Y., Al-Neami, M. A., & Jajjawi, N. H. (2014). Prediction of Liquefaction Potential and Pore Water Pressure beneath Machine Foundations. Central European Journal of Engineering, 4(3), 226-249. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13531-013-0165-y.

3. Fattah, M. Y., Salim, N. M., & Haleel, R. J. (2018). Liquefaction Potential of Sandy Soil from Small Laboratory Machine Foundation Model. International Review of Civil Engineering, 9(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.15866/irece.v9i1.13737.

4. Abdullah, H. H., Fattah, M. Y., & Abed, A. H. (2018). Determination of Liquefaction Potential for Two Selected Sites in Kerbala City-Middle of Iraq. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.8268.

5. Ecemis, N. (2020). Effect of soil-type and fines content on liquefaction resistance-shear wave velocity correlation. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 24(8), 1311-1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1475312.

6. Karim, H. H., Fattah, M. Y., & Hasan, A. M. (2010). Evaluation of Some Geotechnical Properties and Liquefaction Potential from Seismic Parameters. Iraqi Journal of Civil Engineering, 6(3), 30-45.

7. Tong, L., Che, H., Pan, H., Zhang, M., & Guo, Q. (2019). Comparison of shear wave velocity prediction models to Yangtze river deltaic sediments based on piezocone test data. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 17, 1845-1858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00408-3.

8. Karray, M., Lefebvre, G., Ethier, Y., & Bigras, A. (2011). Influence of particle size on the correlation between shear wave velocity and cone tip resistance. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48(4), 599-615. https://doi.org/10.1139/t10-092.

9. Chen, Y.R., Chen, J.W., Shun-Chieh Hsieh, S.C., & Chang, Y.T. (2013). Evaluation of soil liquefaction potential based on the nonlinear energy dissipation principles. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, (17), 54-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2012.691256.

10. Kasim, M. N., & Raheem, A. M. (2021). Evaluation of some soil characteristics from field SPT values using random number generation technique. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, (779), 012017, 2-13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/779/1/012017.

11. Wichtmann, T., & Triantafyllidis, T. H. (2009). Influence of the grain size distribution curve of quartz sand on the small strain shear modulus Gmax. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering ASCE, 135(10), 1404-1418. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000096.

12. Bui, M. T., Clayton, C. R. I., & Priest, J. A. (2007). Effects of particle shape on Gmax of geomaterials. Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 1536.

13. Santamarina, J. C., Klein, A., & Fam, M. A. (2001). Soils and waves: Particulate materials behavior, characterization and process monitoring. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 1(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987719.

14. Yimsiri, S., & Soga, K. (2000). Micromechanics-based stress-strain behaviour of soils at small strains. Géotechnique, 50(5), 559-571. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.5.559.

15. Chien, L. K., Lin, M. C., & Oh, E. (2000). Shear wave velocity evaluation on reclaimed soil in West Taiwan. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 10(1), 73-79.

16. Kiku, H., Yoshida, N., Yasuda, S., Irisawa, T., Nakazawa, H., Shimizu, Y., Ansal, A., & Erkan, A. (2001). In-situ penetration tests and soil profiling in Adapazari, Turkey. Proceedings of the ICSMGE/TC4 satellite conference on lessons learned from recent strong earthquakes, 259-265. Retrieved from https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1573387449937537280.

17. Jafari, M. K., Shafiee, A., & Razmkhah, A. (2002). Dynamic properties of fine grained soils in south of Tehran. Journal of Seismological Earthquake Engineering, 4(1), 25-35.

18. Hasancebi, N., & Ulusay, R. (2007). Empirical correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, (66), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-006-0063-0.

19. Hanumantharao, C., & Ramana, G. V. (2008). Dynamic soil properties for microzonation of Delhi, India. Journal of Earth System Science, 117(S2), 719-730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0066-2.

20. Lee, C. T., & Tsai, B. R. (2008). Mapping Vs30 in Taiwan. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 19(6), 671-682. https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.2008.19.6.671(PT).

21. Dikmen, U. (2009). Statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for soils. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 6(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/6/1/007.

22. Uma Maheswari, R., Boominathan, A., & Dodagoudar, G. R. (2009). Use of Surface Waves in Statistical Correlations of Shear Wave Velocity and Penetration Resistance of Chennai Soils. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 28(2), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-009-9285-9.

23. Tsiambaos, G., & Sabatakakis, N. (2010). Empirical estimation of shear wave velocity from in situ tests on soil formations in Greece. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 70(2), 291-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-010-0324-9.

24. Anbazhagan, P., Kumar, A., & Sitharam, T. G. (2012). Seismic Site Classification and Correlation between Standard Penetration Test N Value and Shear Wave Velocity for Lucknow City in Indo-Gangetic Basin. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170(3), 299-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0525-1.

25. Fauzi, A., Irsyam, M., & Fauzi, U. J. (2014). Empirical correlation of shear wave velocity and N-SPT value for Jakarta. International Journal of Geomate, 7(1), 980-984. https://doi.org/10.21660/2014.13.3263.

26. Al-Gburi, H. F., Al-Tawash, B. S., Al-Tamimi, O. S., & Schüth, C. (2023). Impacts of hydrogeochemical processes and land use practices on groundwater quality of Shwan sub-Basin, Kirkuk, northern Iraq. Heliyon, 9(3), e13995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13995.

27. Andrus, R. D., & Stokoe II, K. H. (2000). Liquefaction Resistance of Soils from Shear-Wave Velocity. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 126(11), 1015-1025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2000)126:11(1015).

28. Al-Taie, A. J., & Albusoda, B. S. (2019). Earthquake hazard on Iraqi soil: Halabjah earthquake as a case study. Geodesy and Geodynamics, (10), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2019.03.004.

29. Jassim, S. Z., & Goff, J. C. (2006). Geology of Iraq. Dolin, Prague and Morravian Museum, Brno, Chech Republic. ISBN: 80-7028-287-8.

 

Visitors

6169282
Today
This Month
All days
562
35347
6169282

Guest Book

If you have questions, comments or suggestions, you can write them in our "Guest Book"

Registration data

ISSN (print) 2071-2227,
ISSN (online) 2223-2362.
Journal was registered by Ministry of Justice of Ukraine.
Registration number КВ No.17742-6592PR dated April 27, 2011.

Contacts

D.Yavornytskyi ave.,19, pavilion 3, room 24-а, Dnipro, 49005
Tel.: +38 (056) 746 32 79.
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
You are here: Home