Articles

Monitoring as a component of the course “Life safety and labor protection”

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №5 2022

Last Updated on 30 October 2022

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 2511

Authors:

L.Demchyk, orcid.org/0000-0001-5698-7113, Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.Herasymchuk, orcid.org/0000-0002-3025-9211, Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2022, (5): 170 - 173

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-5/170

Abstract:

Purpose. Analysis, generalization and comprehension of the experience of using modern control methods, as well as the definition of psychological and pedagogical bases of application of test control when studying the discipline of labor protection.

Methodology. To achieve the goal, a number of scientific methods were used, in particular systematization, theoretical analysis and generalization.

Findings. The notion of control as a subsystem within the training system as a whole was considered. Tasks, functions and types of control are considered. Control acts as an effective means of management, correction and stimulation. An integral part of the control is an assessment system, which is understood as a mechanism for carrying out a control and diagnostic communication between the teacher and a student on the success of the educational process. Types of audits of educational achievements are analyzed and their advantages and disadvantages are distinguished. The meaning of knowledge control is an estimate. Valuation functions are determined as a tool for stimulating cognitive processes. The benefits of the rating assessment system are considered. It is established that in the process of verification and evaluation it is important to strive and achieve consistency, the objectivity of determining the level of educational achievements of students based on the main requirements in accordance with specific objectives and individual characteristics of development of cognitive abilities.

Originality. The effectiveness of the modern system of control and evaluation of student achievements, objectivity and representativeness of the obtained results in terms of distance learning was considered and analyzed.

Practical value. The study of students knowledge should give objective information not only about the final result of educational activity, but also about the educational activity itself: whether the form of action corresponds to this stage. Properly delivered control of students educational activities allows the teacher to evaluate their knowledge, skills, abilities, to provide the necessary assistance and achieve their learning goals.

Keywords: higher education institution, monitoring, control of training achievements, evaluation, rating

References:

1. Irving, K. E. (2020). Technology-assisted formative assessment. Learning and Performance Assessment: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 435-453. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0420-8.ch021.

2. Vivek, B., Kamat, J., & Kittur, K. (2017). Quantifying the quality of higher and technical education: salient perspectives, International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management,8,515-527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0428-0.

3. Sandstrm, C., Wennberg, K., Wallin, M.W., & Zherlygina, Y. (2018). Public policy for academic entrepreneurship initiatives: a review and critical discussion. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(5), 1232-1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100814.

4. Asadi, M., Reza, G., Akbari, R., & Ghafar, R. (2016). Program evaluation of the New English Textbook (prospect 1) in the Iranian Ministry of Education. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 291-301. https://doi.org/10.17507/ tpls.0602.10.

5. Lee, J., & Zuilkowski, S. (2017). Conceptualising education quality in Zambia: acomparative analysis across the local, national and globaldiscourses. Comparative Education, 18, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1348020.

6. Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Esposito, E., & Shashi, S. (2019). The mediating role of knowledge exploration and exploitation for the development of an entrepreneurial university. Management Decision, 57(12), 3301-3320. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2018-1240.

7. Subrahmanyam, A.(2017). Relationship between service quality, satisfaction, motivation and loyalty: A multi-dimensional perspective.Quality Assurance in Education, 25(2), 171-188.https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-04-2013-0016.

8. Tridane, M., Belaaouad, S., Benmokhtar, S., Gourja, B., & Radid,M. (2015). The impact of formative assessment on the learning process and the unreliability of the mark for the summative evaluation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 680-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.058.

9. Arsenijevi, J. (2011). Methodology for assessment of knowledge management in higher education institutions. African Journal of Business Management, 5(8), 3168-3178.

10. Johnson, C. C., Sondergeld, T. A., & Walton, J. B. (2019). A Study of the Implementation of Formative Assessment in Three Large Urban Districts. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2408-2438. https://doi.org/10.310 2/0002831219842347.

11. Hsu, S., Wang, Y., Cheng, C., & Chen, Y. (2016). Developing a decomposed alumni satisfaction model for higher education institutions. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(9-10), 979-996. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1054102.

12. Giones, F. (2019). Universityindustry collaborations: an industry perspective. Management Decision, 57(12), 3258-3279. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2018-1182.

13. Sahney, S. (2016).Use of multiple methodologies for developing a customer-oriented model of total quality management in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(3), 326-353.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2014-0126.

14. Khalil, M.(2021). Responsiveness to quality assurance implementation: an institutional theory perspective.Quality Assurance in Education, 29(1), 41-52.https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-06-2020-0074.

15. Rybnicek, R., Leitner, K.-H., Baumgartner, L., & Plakolm, J. (2019). Industry and leadership experiences of the heads of departments and their impact on the performance of public universities. Management Decision, 57(12), 3321-3345. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2018-1173.

16. Kuzmina, M., Protas, O., Fartushok, T., Raievska, Y., & Ivanova,I. (2020). Formation of Students Competence of Tertiary Educational Institutions by Practical Training Aids. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(7), 279-288. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n7p279.

17. Flek, R., & Prince, T. (2014). Developing and Teaching an Honors Calculus Course in a Community College. Hispanic Educational Technology Services Online Journal, IV. Retrieved from http://hets.org/ejournal/2014/07/19/developing-and-teaching-an-honors-calculus-course-in-a-community-college.

18. OSullivan, D.(2017). Evolution of internal quality assurance at one university a case study.Quality Assurance in Education, 25(2), 189-205.https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-03-2016-0011.

19. Kohler, B., & Alibegovic, E. (2015). Assessing for Learning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 424-433. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.20.7.0424.

20. Hashmi, S., Hussain, S., Zaman, T., Arshad, S., & Akhtar, N. (2021). Formative assessment practices implemented in english language learning programs in SINDH. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 9(3), 703-712. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2021.9369.

• < Prev
• Next >