Investment management and financial development in infrastructure renovation of a sustainable-built environment

User Rating:  / 0
PoorBest 

Authors:


V.Koval*, orcid.org/0000-0003-2562-4373, Izmail State University of Humanities, Izmail, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

I.Mikhno, orcid.org/0000-0003-3661-1965, National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.Zharikova, orcid.org/0000-0002-1259-1712, National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.Tsvirko, orcid.org/0000-0003-3391-942X, State University of Infrastructure and Technologies, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

T.Metil, orcid.org/0000-0002-4553-4343, Izmail State University of Humanities, Izmail, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

V.Nitsenko, orcid.org/0000-0002-2185-0341, SCIRE Foundation, Warsaw, the Republic of Poland, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


повний текст / full article



Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2023, (2): 091 - 097

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2023-2/091



Abstract:



Purpose.
The paper substantiates the approach to managing the renewal of ecosystems of territories and the renovation of infrastructure using investment support and resource rationalization based on the financial development of a sustainable built environment.


Methodology.
The methodology is based on a study of the investment and financial resources that can be used to rebuild destroyed infrastructure, and it was carried out using analytical methods to assess infrastructure renovation costs, statistical methods of data analysis on the state of the environmental and economic systems, as well as mathematical modeling and balance methods for the formation of a green city model. 


Findings.
The investment potential of Ukraine was analyzed, and a conclusion was made about the feasibility of implementing the project, increasing the economic efficiency of smart green cities, which creates prerequisites for further infrastructure renovation in Ukraine. The study reveals the key economic and environmental problems of Ukraine, suggests ways of overcoming them, and offers a model for developing the territories destroyed by military action. An approach to the renovation of the territory based on the restoration of the ecosystems of the regions and cities and the creation of comfortable conditions for the return of citizens to their homeland is proposed.


Originality.
The article outlines the basic principles for renovating a destroyed infrastructure based on energy efficiency and environmental friendliness. The possibilities of financing environmental projects in the post-war restoration of the national economy are considered.


Practical value.
The proposed approach makes it possible to evaluate investments in infrastructure renovation and ensure effective management of financial development in a sustainable-built environment.



Keywords:
investment management, renovation, infrastructure, green city, rational nature management

References.


1. Biermann, F. (2021). The future of ‘environmental’ policy in the Anthropocene: time for a paradigm shift. Environmental Politics, 30(1-2), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1846958.

2. Dvigun, A., Datsii, O., Levchenko, N., Shyshkanova, G., & Dmytrenko, R. (2022). Rational Use of Fresh Water as a Guarantee of Agribusiness Development in the Context of the Exacerbated Climate Crisis. Science and Innovation, 18(2), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine18.02.085.

3. Ahmed, Z., Zhang, B., & Cary, M. (2021). Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecological Indicators, 121, 107060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107060.

4. Atstaja, D., Cudecka-Purina, N., Hrinchenko, R., Koval, V., Grasis, J., & Vesere, R. (2022). Alignment of circular economy business models for framing national sustainable economic development. Acta Innovations. 42, 5-14. https://doi.org/10.32933/ActaInnovations.42.1.

5. Salamanca, A. (2022). 25 of the Most Technologically Advanced Cities in the World. Retrieved from https://list25.com/25-of-the-most-technologically-advanced-cities-in-the-world/.

6. Rozpedowski, J. (2021). Book review: Military waste: the unexpected consequences of permanent war readiness by Joshua O. Reno. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) blog. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/110612/1/europpblog_2021_04_11_book_review_military_waste_the_unexpected.pdf.

7. Miljenović, A., & Žganec, N. (2012). Disintegration and possibilities for rebuilding of war-affected communities: The Vojnić Municipality case. International Social Work, 55(5), 645-661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872812447636.

8. Goniewicz, K., Burkle, F.M., Horne, S., Borowska-Stefańska, M., Wiśniewski, S., & Khorram-Manesh, A. (2021). Impact of war and conflicts on infectious diseases: quick review of historical lessons to be learned. Sustainability, 13(19), 10783. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910783.

9. Lewis, P. (2021). The Age of Ecology in the UK. Architecture and Collective Life, (pp. 274-283). Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003118985-29/age-ecology-uk-penny-lewis.

10. Brauch, H.G. (2021). Peace ecology in the Anthropocene. In: Decolonising Conflicts, Security, Peace, Gender, Environment and Development in the Anthropocene,  (pp. 51-185). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62316-6_2.

11. Baran, M., Kłos, M., Chodorek, M., & Marchlewska-Patyk, K. (2022). The Resilient Smart City Model–Proposal for Polish Cities. Energies, 15(5), 1818. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15051818.

12. Chen, K., Long, H., Liao, L., Tu, S., & Li, T. (2020). Land use transitions and urban-rural integrated development: Theoretical framework and China’s evidence. Land Use Policy, 92, 104465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104465.

13. Saari, U. A., Damberg, S., Frömbling, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention. Ecological Economics, 189, 107155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107155.

14. de Morais, L. H. L., Pinto, D. C., & Cruz-Jesus, F. (2021). Circular economy engagement: Altruism, status, and cultural orientation as drivers for sustainable consumption. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 523-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.019.

15. Gomes, G. M., Moreira, N., & Ometto, A. R. (2022). Role of consumer mindsets, behaviour, and influencing factors in circular consumption systems: A systematic review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.04.005.

16. Kautish, P., Paço, A., & Thaichon, P. (2022). Sustainable consumption and plastic packaging: Relationships among product involvement, perceived marketplace influence and choice behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 103032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103032.

17. Parajuly, K., Fitzpatrick, C., Muldoon, O., & Kuehr, R. (2020). Behavioral change for the circular economy: A review with focus on electronic waste management in the EU. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, X(6), 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100035.

18. Cinelli, M., Coles, S. R., & Kirwan, K. (2014). Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment. Ecological indicators, 46, 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.011.

19. Wong, N. H., Jusuf, S. K., & Tan, C. L. (2011). Integrated urban microclimate assessment method as a sustainable urban development and urban design tool. Landscape and urban planning, 100(4), 386-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.012.

20. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2022). Capital investments for environmental protection by types of economic activity with distribution by types of environmental protection measures. Retrieved from https://ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2020/ns/kap_in/arch_kionps_ek_u.htm.

 

Visitors

5817256
Today
This Month
All days
750
14702
5817256

Guest Book

If you have questions, comments or suggestions, you can write them in our "Guest Book"

Registration data

ISSN (print) 2071-2227,
ISSN (online) 2223-2362.
Journal was registered by Ministry of Justice of Ukraine.
Registration number КВ No.17742-6592PR dated April 27, 2011.

Contacts

D.Yavornytskyi ave.,19, pavilion 3, room 24-а, Dnipro, 49005
Tel.: +38 (056) 746 32 79.
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
You are here: Home Authors and readers terms of subscription EngCat Archive 2023 Content №2 2023 Investment management and financial development in infrastructure renovation of a sustainable-built environment