Evaluation of the new rotational hypothesis of the Earth’s tectonosphere structure formation from the perspective of dialectical materialism
/ 0
- Details
- Category: Geology
- Last Updated on 19 March 2014
- Published on 26 February 2013
- Hits: 3407
Authors:
K.F. Tyapkin, Dr. Sci. (Geol.-Min.), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, State Higher Educational Institution “National Mining University,” Professor of the Department of Geophysical Methods of Mineral Prospecting, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine
Abstract:
Purpose. To determinethe current state of the Earth tectonic development problem, that is essential for choosing rational system of training geological profile specialists for studying the Earth’s crust. All features of the Earth’s crust are closely associated with the development of the Earth as a whole. The main difficulty in achieving the assigned goal is that the idea of researchers on the Earth development is mostly hypothetical, its relationship with the formation of the Earth’s crust had been evolved over the time, but nothing has been rejected.
Methodology. The method of achieving the goal waselected to be the following – it was conducted the analysis of the materiality concept that was used, and the main advantages and disadvantages that determine its potential.
Findings. Therefore, the first analyzed concept was the concept of geosynclines and platforms that emerged in the second half of the XIX century with the systematic study of the Earth’s crust continents. The main advantage of this concept is that it is formulated on the results of direct examination of the actual Earth crust structures and is devoid of hypothetical assumptions. The main disadvantage consists in the lack of reference to the source of the forces that can explain the mechanisms of the structures formation, which are studied.
In the early postwar years an intensive study of the Earth’s crust within oceans started. It was carried out mainly by geophysical methods. Their main feature is their catastrophic shortage of parametric data on the geologic sections, which resulted in some uncertainty of the field observations interpretation results. Basing on the results of this Earth’s crust study within the oceans it was formulated a new tectonic concept, which received the name of the ‘Tectonics of Lithosphere Plates’. It is based on an idea of spreading of the ocean floor. From our perspective, this is mainly speculative concept that has very little common with reality. The attempts to extend it on conditions of the continents were found to be groundless. This is evidenced by the impossibility of explaining the concept of the basic laws of geosynclines and platforms from the perspective of the tectonics of lithosphere plates. But its main drawback is the absence of the description of the real source of the power which can explain the mechanism of crustal structures formation.
In the second half of the twentieth century the New Rotational Hypothesis of the structure formation in the Earth’s tektonosphere was offered, which is fundamentally different from the mentioned above. According to this hypothesis tektonic development of the Earth, and of its crust, is the result of the interaction of the planet with the surrounding space fields, and the specific source of the forces that affect the development process is the rotation tension field, which arise from the Earth’s tectonosphere due to variations in rotation mode. To identify the postulates of this hypothesis, we have performed the analysis of compliance of its main provisions with the categories of dialectical materialism. It turned out that they are fully consistent to each other. Therefore, to assess the reliability of the New Rotational Hypothesis of the structure formation, it was also applied a criterion of dialectical materialism – practice.
Originality. We have applied the laws of dialectical materialism to substantiate the New Rotational Hypothesis.
Practical value. We haveapplied a complexapproachto the analysis ofgeo-tectonichypotheses, which increases their evidence grade.
References:
1. Тяпкин К.Ф. Физика Земли / К.Ф. Тяпкин – К.: Высшая школа, 1998. – 312 с.
Tyapkin, K.F. (1998), Fizika Zemli [Physics of the Earth], Vysshaya shkola, Kiev, Ukraine.
2. Тяпкин К.Ф. Общность и отличие геологических разрезов тектоносферы Земли в пределах континентов и океанов / Тяпкин К.Ф. // Геология и полезные ископаемые мирового океана – К., 2012. – 1(27) – С. 22– 33.
Tyapkin, K.F. (2012), “Uniformity and Difference of the Earth’s Tectonosphere Geological Sections within the continents and the oceans”, Geologiya i poleznye iskopayemye mirovogo okeana, no.1(27), pp. 22–33.
3. Обуэн Ж. Геосинклинали и проблемы их происхождения и развития / Ж. Обуэн – М.: Мир, 1967. – 302 с.
Aubouin, J. (1967), Geosinklinali i problemy ikh proiskhozhdeniya i razvitiya [Geosyncline and Problems of Their Origin and Development], Mir, Moscow, Russia.
4. Белоусов В.В. Основные вопросы геотектоники / В.В. Белоусов – М.: Госгеолтехиздат, 1962. – 508 с.
Belousov, V.V. (1962), Osnovnye voprosy geotektoniki [The Main Issues of Geotectonics], Gosgeoltekhizdat, Moscow, Russia.
5. Хаин В.Е. Общая геотектоника / В.Е. Хаин – М.: Недра, 1973. – 511 с.
Khain, V.Ye. (1973), Obshchaya geotektonika [General Geotectonics], Nedra, Moscow, Russia.
6. Пейве А.В. Некоторые основные вопросы учения о геосинклиналях / Пейве А.В., Синицын В.М. // Изв. АНСССР. Сер. геологич. – 1960. – № 4. – С.28–52.
Peyve, A.V. and Sinitsyn, V.M. (1960), “Some Basic Questions of Geosynclines Doctrine”, Izvestiya AN SSSR Series Geology, no.4, pp. 28–52.
7. Билибин Ю.А. Металлогенические провинции и металлогенические эпохи / Ю.А. Билибин – М.: Госгеолтехиздат, 1955. – 88 с.
Bilibin, Yu.A. (1955), Metallogenicheskiye provintsii i metallogenicheskiye epokhi [Metallogenic Province and Metallogenic Epoch], Gosgeoltekhizdat, Moscow, Russia.
8. Тяпкин К.Ф. Новая ротационная гипотеза структурообразования и ее геолого-математическое обоснование / К.Ф. Тяпкин, М.М. Довбнич – Донецк: Ноулидж, 2009. – 342 с.
Tyapkin, K.F. and Dovbnich, M.M. (2009), Novaya rotatsyonnaya gipoteza strukturoobrazovaniya i ee geologo-matematicheskoye obosnovaniye [New Rotational Hypothesis of Structure Formation and Its Geological-Mathematical Substantiation], Knowledge, Donietsk, Ukraine.
9. Земная кора. – М.: Изд.-во ИЛ, 1957. – 788 с.
Zemnaya kora[Earth Crust], (1957), Izdatelstvo IL, Moscow, Russia.
10. Новая глобальная тектоника – М.: Мир, 1974. – 472 с.
Novaya globalnaya tektonika[New General Tectonics], (1974), Mir, Moscow, Russia.
11. Вегенер А. Возникновение материков и океанов / А. Вегенер – М.-Л., 1925. – 158 с.
Vegener, A. (1925), Vozniknoveniye materikov i okeanov [Appearance of Continents and Oceans], Moscow, Russia.
12. Хаин В.Е. Современная геология: проблемы и перспективы / Хаин В.Е. // Соровский образоват. журн. – 1996. – №1. – С. 66–73.
Khain, V.Ye. (1996), “Modern geology: problems and prospects”, Sorovskiy obrazovatelnyi zhurnal, no.1, pp. 66–73.
13. Белоусов В.В. Общие вопросы развития тектоносферы / Белоусов В.В. // Кора и верхняя мантия Земли – М.: Наука, 1968. – С.5–13.
Belousov, V.V. (1968), “General problems of tectonosphere development”, Kora i verkhnyaya mantiya Zemli, Nauka, Moscow, pp. 5–13.
14. Диалектический материализм // Советский энциклопедический словарь. – М.: Советская энциклопедия, 1982. – 383с.
“Dialectical materialism”, (1982), Sovetskiy entsyklopedicheskiy slovar, Sovetskaya entsyklopediya, Moskow Russia.
15. Субботин С.И.Мантия Земли и тектогенез / Субботин С.И., Наумчик Г.Л., Рахимова И.Ш. – К.: Наук. думка, 1968. – 175 с.
Subbotin, S.I., Naumchik, G.L. andRakhimova, I.Sh. (1968), MantiyaZemliitektogenez[Earth’s Mantle and Tectogenesis], NaukovaDumka, Kiev, Ukraine.
16. Тяпкин К.Ф. Вращение Земли – единственный реальный источник энергии тектогенеза / Тяпкин К.Ф., Довбнич М.М // Геофизика – 2007. – № 1. – С. 59–84
Tyapkin, K.F. and Dovbnich, M.M. (2007), “Rotation of the Earth as the only real energy source of tectogenesis”, Geofizika, no.1, pp. 69–84.
17. Энгельс Ф. Вращение Земли и лунное притяжение / Энгельс Ф. // Диалектика природы. – М.: Изд-во полит. литературы, 1987. – С. 82–86.
Friedrich Engels (1987), “Rotation of the Earth and moon gravitation”, Dialektika prirody, Izdatelstvo Polit. Literatury, Moscow, pp. 82–86.
18. Движение полюса Земли с 1890.0 по 1969.0 / [Е.П. Федоров, А.А. Корсунь, С.П. Майор и др.] – К.: Наукова думка, 1972. – 264 с.
Fedorov, Ye.P., Korsun, A.A. and Mayor, S.P. (1972), Dvizhenie polyusa Zemli s 1890.0 po 1969.0 [Earth Pole Movement from 1890.0 to 1969.0], Naukova Dumka, Kiev, Ukraine.
19. Личков Б.Л. Природные воды Земли и литосфераБ.Л. Личков /– М.-Л: Изд.-во АН СССР, 1960. – 164 с.
Lichkov, B.L. (1960), Prirodnye vody Zemli i litosfera [Natural Waters of the Earth and Lithosphere], IzdatelstvoAN SSSR, Moscow, Russia.
20. Стовас М.В. Избранные труды/М.В. Стовас – М.: Недра, 1975. – 153 с.
Stovas, M.V. (1975), Izbrannye trudy [Selectas], Nedra, Moscow, Russia.
21. Тяпкин К.Ф. Новая ротационная гипотеза структурообразования в земной коре/Тяпкин К.Ф. // Геол.журнал – 1974. – № 4. – С.3–16.
Tyapkin, K.F. (1974), “New Rotational Hypothesis of Structure Formation in the Earth Crust”, Geologicheskiy zhurnal, no.4, pp. 3–16.
22. Тяпкин К.Ф. Новая модель изостазии Земли/Тяпкин К.Ф. // Сб. тезисов докладов XXVIIIсессии МГК. – М., 1984. – С. 438–439.
Tyapkin, K.F. (1984), “New Model of the Earth equal balance”, Sbornik tezisov dokladov of the XXVIII MGK session, Moscow, pp. 438–439.
23. Геофизические методы изучения систем разломов земной коры и принципы использования для прогнозирования рудных месторождений. Тезисы докладов Всесоюзной н.-т. конференции – Днепропетровск: РИО ДГИ, 1988. –107 с.
Geophysical methods of crustal fault systems study and their application for ore deposits exploration, Proc. of the All-USSR sci.-tech. conf., RIO DGI, 1998, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine.
24. Маркс К. Диалектика природы/К. Маркс, Ф. Энгельс– М.: Госполитиздат, 1961. – Т. 20–827 с.
Marx K. (1961), Dialektika prirody [Dialectic of Nature], Vol.20, Gospolitizdat, Moscow, Russia.
25. Маркс К. Диалектика природы/К. Маркс, Ф. Энгельс– М.: Госполитиздат, 1955. – Т. 4. – 615 с.
Marx K. (1955), Dialektika prirody [Dialectic of Nature], Vol.4, Gospolitizdat, Moscow, Russia.
26. Маркс К. Диалектика природы/К. Маркс, Ф. Энгельс– М.: Госполитиздат, 1955. – Т. 3.– 630 с.
Marx K. (1955), Dialektika prirody [Dialectic of Nature], Vol.3, Gospolitizdat, Moscow, Russia.
27. Штилле Г. Избранные труды (перевод с немецкого)/Г.Штилле – М.: Мир, 1964. – 888 с.
Shtille, G. (1964), Izbrannye trudy[Selectas], Mir, Moscow, Russia.
 01_2013_tjapk
|
|
 2014-03-19  628.92 KB  1373 |
|
