Науковий вісник НГУ

Implementation of corporate social responsibility in the context of integration with the enterprise management information system

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №1 2024

Last Updated on 29 February 2024

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 2269

Authors:

R.Volchek*, orcid.org/0000-0002-3741-1458, Odesa National Economic University, Odesa, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

H.Moskaliuk, orcid.org/0000-0002-9810-0522, Odesa National Economic University, Odesa, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

L.Halan, orcid.org/0000-0002-4118-9255, State University of Intelligent Technologies and Telecommunications, Odesa, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.Dancheva, orcid.org/0000-0003-4125-6718, Odesa National Economic University, Odesa, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2024, (1): 154 - 161

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2024-1/154

Abstract:

Purpose. To develop recommendations for the corporate digital responsibility (CDR) strategy aimed at increasing the level of integration of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and information systems (IS) of the company. To develop a mathematical model of coordination decisions regarding CSR with production and business activities of companies.

Methodology. The introduction of the methods of: logical generalization made it possible to define CDR adapted to Ukrainian realities; analysis and synthesis – to point out the need to integrate CSR with IS; comparative analysis – to determine directions, tasks, requirements for the implementation of CDR; logical abstraction – to substantiate the need to implement strategy for CDR implementation, develop its stages, tasks and goals of each stages; mathematical analysis – to develop mathematical model of coordination of management decisions.

Findings. A definition of CDR, adapted to Ukrainian reality, which became the conceptual basis of the presented research, is proposed. The need for integration of CSR and IS and the formation of a new mechanism – CDR, as a result of the evolution of CSR, is substantiated. The directions, tasks, and requirements for the implementation of CDR are defined. The need to implement the strategy for the implementation of CDR are substantiated, its stages, tasks and goals of each stage are developed. It is indicated that the integration of CSR and IS can take place iteratively, with management gaining experience and finding optimal methods and tools.

Originality. A mathematical model that allows one not only to coordinate various management decisions, but also to forecast their short-term and long-term results, is developed.

Practical value. The proposed approach to CDR strategy formation will increase the effectiveness of CDR and improve the integration of CSR and IS. The developed mathematical model will allow one not only to solve the problem of coordination of management decisions, but will also help to economically spend IT resources and speed up the delivery of results.

Keywords: management, corporate social responsibility, information systems, mathematical model

References.

1. Matrosova, L. (2019). The development of the conception of the corporate social responsibility (CSR) of business in Ukraine. Market infrastructure, 33, 194-201. https://doi.org/10.32843/infrastruct33-29.

2. Zozuľaková, V., & Orbik, Z. (2019). Corporate social and digital responsibility. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 27(2), 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1515/mspe-2019-0013.

3. Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159-1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639.

4. Atanasov, A., Chipriyanova, G., & Krasteva-Hristova, R. (2023). Integration of Digital Technologies in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16, 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16080373.

5. Hakimi, A., Boussaada, R., & Karmani, M. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: a threshold analysis of European firms. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 2(24). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2022-0224.

6. Fenech, R., Baguant, P., & Ivanov, D. (2019). The changing role of human resource management in an era of digital transformation. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 22(2), 166-175.

7. Vasyltsiv, T., Lupak, R., & Rudkovsky, O. (2019). Directions and means of improving social responsibility of enterprise in Ukraine. Ekonomika ta Derzhava, 5, 4. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6806.2019.5.4.

8. Yevstakhevych, A. (2021). Large enterprises of Ukraine, sustainable development and social responsibility: transparency in times of crisis. Law, Business and Sustainability Herald, 1(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.46489/lbsh.2021-1-1-2.

9. Mihale-Wilson, C., Hinz, O., van der Aalst, W., & Weinhardt, C. (2022). Corporate Digital Responsibility. Business Information Systems Engineering, 64(2), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-022-00746-y.

10. Mueller, B. (2022). Corporate Digital Responsibility. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 64(5), 689-700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-022-00760-0.

11. Elliott, K., Price, R., Shaw, P., Spiliotopoulos, T., Ng, M., Coopamootoo, K., & van Moorsel, A. (2021). Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR). Society, 58, 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8.

12. Van der Aalst, W. M. P., Bichler, M., & Heinzl, A. (2017). Responsible Data Science. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 59(5), 311-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0487-z.

13. De Ruiter, M., Schaveling, J., Ciulla, J. B., & Nijhof, A. (2018). Leadership and the Creation of Corporate Social Responsibility: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 871-874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3883-5.

14. Lobschat, L., Mueller, B., Eggers, F., Brandimarte, L., Diefenbach, S., Kroschke, Mi., & Wirtz, J. (2021). Corporate digital responsibility. Journal of Business Research, 122, 875-888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006.

15. Herden, C. J., Alliu, E., Cakici, A., Cormier, T., Deguelle, C., Gambhir, S., …, & Schons, L. (2021). “Corporate Digital Responsibility”. New corporate responsibilities in the digital age. Nachhaltigkeits Management Forum, 29, 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-020-00509-x.

16. Chen, L., & Chen, Y. (2023). A Metaorganizations Perspective on Digital Innovation and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 15(14), 11031. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411031.

17. Salehi, M., & Alkhyyoon, H. (2022). The relationship between managerial entrenchment, social responsibility, and firm’s risk-taking and shareholders’ activity. Social Responsibility Journal, 18, 1035-1049. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-10-2019-0339.

18. Trushkina, N., & Rynkevych, N. (2020). Modernization of organizational culture of enterprises in the epoch of digital transformations. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 6(2), 144-173. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2020.06.02.09.

19. Isensee, C., Teuteberg, F., Griese, K.-M., & Topi, C. (2020). The relationship between organizational culture, sustainability, and digitalization in SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122944.

20. Khin, S., & Ho, T. C. (2018). Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11, 177-195. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2018-0083.

21. Semenets-Orlova, I., Shevchuk, R., Plish, B., Moshnin, A., Chmyr, Y., & Poliuliakh, R. (2022). Human-centered approach in new development tendencies of value-oriented public administration: Potential of education. Economic Affairs, 67(5), 899-906. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.5.2022.25.

22. Semenets-Orlova, I., Rodchenko, L., Chernenko, I., Druz, O., Rudenko, M., & Poliuliakh, R. (2022). Requests for Public Information in the State Administration in Situations of Military Operations. Anuario De La Facultad De Derecho. Universidad De Extremadura, 38, 249-270. https://doi.org/10.17398/2695-7728.38.249.

23. Zayed, N. M., Edeh, F. O., Darwish, S., Islam, K. M. A., Kry­shtal, H., Nitsenko, V., & Stanislavyk, O. (2022). Human resource skill adjustment in service sector: Predicting dynamic capability in post COVID-19 work environment. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(9), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15090402.

24. Oberascher, L., Ploder, C., Spiess, J., Bernsteiner, R., & Van Kooten, W. (2023). Data Storytelling to Communicate Big Data Internally – a Guide for Practical Usage. European Journal of Management Issues, 31(1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.15421/192303.

25. Kuznetsov, A., Gorbenko, Y., Kolovanova, I., Smirnov, S., Perevozova, I., & Kuznetsova, T. (2021). Output Feedback Encryption Mode: Periodic Features of Output Blocks Sequence. In: Radivilova, T., Ageyev, D., Kryvinska, N. (eds) Data-Centric Business and Applications. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, 48. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43070-2_27.

• < Prev
• Next >