Numerical study on deformation around underground mining structures (Algeria)

User Rating:  / 0
PoorBest 

Authors:


S.Berdoudi*, orcid.org/0000-0002-3612-6823, Lavamine laboratory Badji Mokhtar University, Annaba, Algeria, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

M.A.R.Morsli, orcid.org/0000-0001-5242-986X, Lavamine laboratory Badji Mokhtar University, Annaba, Algeria

Z.Mekti, orcid.org/0000-0002-6153-7026, Lavamine laboratory Badji Mokhtar University, Annaba, Algeria

A.Benselhoub, orcid.org/0000-0001-5891-2860, Environment, Modeling and Climate ChangeDivision, Environmental Research Center (C.R.E), Annaba, Algeria

* Corresponding author e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


повний текст / full article



Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2022, (6): 047 - 051

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-6/047



Abstract:



Purpose.
To study the stability of underground mining structures using numerical method based on finite elements, two-dimensional (2D), Finite Element (FE) modeling using GEO5 calculation model.


Methodology.
To consider the influence of geotechnical parameters, the tunneling is carried out by the NATM method. In order to check settlements in soft ground and to carry out the work in complete safety, we used software based on the finite element method.


Findings.
Determination of the range and prediction of subsoil displacements are necessary when designing this type of structure due to the need to ensure the safety of the active environment located in the zone of influence.


Originality.
The originality of this work is the characterization of the soil of the studied region, determining of the different physical and mechanical properties as well as the modeling with a recent calculation model based on the Mohr-Coulomb behavior mode.


Practical value.
Given the characteristics of the current section, this study illustrates that the results obtained using the GEO5 calculation code, show the movement exceeding the permitted threshold; its values are 47.80 and 46.6 mm respectively in the first and second step, which can induce significant ground movements. As a solution, there are possibilities of reducing the current declivity within the limits authorized for this type of line (maximum = 40) in order to increase the cover (height of earth on the key) of the tunnel and consequently reduce surface settlements.



Keywords:
soil displacement, tunnel, numerical modeling, settlement, underground structure, finite element method, GEO5

References.


1. Yan, Q., Nengxiong, X., Zhongjian, Z., & Bin, Z. (2021). Failure Process of Rock Strata Due to Multi-seam Coal Mining: Insights from Physical Modelling. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 54(5), 1-14. China. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02415-0.

2. Longhui, Guo (2020). Research on the settlement and deformation law of overlying rock under the influence of mining. Academic Journal of Engineering and Technology Science, 3(5), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJETS.2020.030517.

3. Svoboda, J.S., & McCartney, J.S. (2014). Shearing Rate Effects on Dense Sand and Compacted Clay. Dynamic Behavior of Materials, 1, 389-395. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00771-7_47.

4. Elmanan, A.M.A., & Elarabi, H. (2016). Analytical and numerical analysis for tunnel heading stability. Conference paper: The Seventh Graduate Studies and Scientific Research Conference, Khartoum, Sudan. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299377004.

5. Ahmed, S.N.A., & David, N.C. (2019). Numerical modelling of tunnel face stability in homogeneous and layered softground. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103096.

6. Elsamny, M.K., Ibrahim, M.A., Kotb, M.H., & Attia, M.G. (2016). Analysis of Two Adjacent Circular Tunnels in Soft Clay Soil. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 5(04), 749-755. https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV5IS040593.

7. Lu, H., Shi, J., Wang, Y., & Wang, R. (2019). Centrifuge modelling of tunneling-induced ground surface settlement in sand. Underground Space, 4(4), 302-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2019.03.007.

8. Michalak, H., & Przybysz, P. (2021). Forecasting the impact of buildings with multistorey underground parts on the displacement of subsoil using modern numerical tools. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 43(s1), 479-491. https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2021-0034.

9. Mzel, S.D., Bonhin, E.P., Guimares, N.M., & Guidi, E.S. (2020). Application of the Finite Element Method in the Analysis of Composite Materials. Polymers, 12(4), 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12040818.

10. Billaux, D., & Dedecker, F. (2018). Numerical rock modeling and fracturation: from continuous to discontinuous. Revue Franaise de Gotechnique, 155, 2. https://doi.org/10.1051/geotech/2018006.

11. Warren, S.N. (2016). Empirical Ground Support Recommendations and Weak Rock Mass Classification for Underground Gold Mines in Nevada. USA. Dissertation. University of Nevada. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11714/2206.

12. Kang, G., Tsuchida, T., Tang, T.X., & Kalim, T.P. (2017). Consistency measurement of cement-treated marine clay using fall cone test and Casagrande liquid limit test. Soils and Foundations, 57(5), 802-814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2017.08.010.

13. Ouyang, Z., & Mayne, P. (2018). Effective Friction Angle of Clays and Silts from Piezocone Penetration Tests. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 55(9). https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0451.

14. Look, B.G. (2007). Handbook of Geotechnical Investigation and Design Tables (1st ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203946602.

15. Serratrice, J.F. (2004). Le tunnel for. Interprtation des dformations de surface. Travaux, (806), 74-75. Retrieved from https://structurae.net.

16. Kahoul, I., Yahyaoui, S., Mehidi, Y., & Khadri, Y. (2021). Shallow tunnel face stability analysis using finite elements. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (1), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-1/091.

17. Volkmann, G., & Schubert, W. (2006). Optimization of Excavation and Support in Pipe Roof Supported Tunnel Sections. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 21(3-4), 404-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.12.213.

18. Shin, J.-H., Choi, Y.-K., Kwon, O.-Y., & Lee, S.-D. (2008). Model testing for pipe-reinforced tunnel heading in a granular soil. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 23, 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.04.012.

19. Serratrice, J.F., & Magnan, J.P. (2002). Analyse et prvision des tassements de surface pendant le creusement du tunnel nord de la traverse souterraine de Toulon. Bulletin des Laboratoires des Ponts et Chausses, (237), 5-36.

 

Visitors

7350783
Today
This Month
All days
58
40286
7350783

Guest Book

If you have questions, comments or suggestions, you can write them in our "Guest Book"

Registration data

ISSN (print) 2071-2227,
ISSN (online) 2223-2362.
Journal was registered by Ministry of Justice of Ukraine.
Registration number КВ No.17742-6592PR dated April 27, 2011.

Contacts

D.Yavornytskyi ave.,19, pavilion 3, room 24-а, Dnipro, 49005
Tel.: +38 (056) 746 32 79.
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
You are here: Home Archive by issue 2022 Content №6 2022 Numerical study on deformation around underground mining structures (Algeria)