Науковий вісник НГУ

Managing the economic security of enterprises in coopetition

• 
• 

User Rating:  / 0

PoorBest 

Details

Category: Content №6 2021

Last Updated on 29 December 2021

Published on 30 November -0001

Hits: 5100

Authors:

R.H.Snishchenko, orcid.org/0000-0003-2857-0980, Robert Elvorti Institute of Economics and Technology, Kropyvnytskyi, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

L.M.Krot, orcid.org/0000-0001-9999-0144, Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostrohradskyi National University, Kremenchuk, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

повний текст / full article

Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2021, (6): 165 - 169

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-6/165

Abstract:

Purpose. Formulation of the main conditions for the emergence of cooperatives, study of its features in the perspective of economic security of cooperative enterprises and its inherent specific risks, definition of basic measures to ensure economic security in the cooperative.

Methodology. The study used general and special research methods: the method of critical analysis, scientific abstraction and generalization of scientific experience of modern theoretical research, system-integrated approach.

Findings. From many economic factors, the main conditions for the emergence of coopetition are distinguished; its features are identified, which can significantly affect the level of economic security of cooperative enterprises. The existing organizational and legal forms of association of enterprises with different degrees of strength and development of structural and functional relations in the application of coopetition and their classification are studied. Specific risks of economic security of business activity at cooperative are defined. Based on the research, a list and content of the main measures to ensure economic security in the cooperative are formulated.

Originality. The given definition of co-operation, in contrast to the existing ones, reveals its security essence as a strategy of coopetition, which allows optimal use of resource potentials of interdependent entities of consolidated management structures with respect to the acceptable level of their economic security. The features and specific risks of coopetition identified in the article in the perspective of economic security of cooperating enterprises allow adjusting the task of increasing the level of their protection, and contribute to the development of a strategy for maximum security of coopetition of interconnected business structures. Amethodological approach was further developed to choosing organizational and legal forms of establishing enterprises with different capacity and development of structural and functional links when applying cooperation.

Practical value. Theoretical provisions of the study on specific risks and the content of the main measures to ensure economic security can be used in strategic and tactical planning of enterprises in coopetition.

Keywords: economic security, coopetition, risk, management, organizational and legal forms of association

References.

1. Luo, Y. (2005). Toward coopetition within a multinational enterprise: a perspective from foreign subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, 40(1), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2004.10.006.

2. Rossi, A., & Warglien, M. (2009). An experimental investigation of fairness and reciprocity as determinants of intraorganizational coopetition. Coopetition strategy: Theory, experiments and cases, (pp. 259-275). Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874301.

3. Bengtsson, M., & Raza-Ullah, T. (2016). A systematic review of research on coopetition: toward a multilevel understanding. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.003.

4. Dorn, S., Schweiger, B., & Albers, S. (2016). Levels, phases and themes of coopetition: A systematic literature review and research agenda, European Management Journal, 34(5), 484-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.009.

5. Gnyawali, D.R., & Park, B.J. (Robert) (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for techno-logical innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 650-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.009.

6. Heiets, I.O. (2017). Coopetitive strategy for regional airports and hubs. Problemy systemnogo pidhodu v ekonomitsi, 1(57), 64-72. https://doi.org/10.32782/2520-2200.

7. Gasta, J., Gundolfa, K., Harmsb, R., & Colladoa, E.M. (2019). Knowledge management and coopetition: How do cooperating competitors balance the needs to share and protect their knowledge? Industrial Marketing Management, 77, 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.12.007.

8. Tidstrm, ., & Rajala, . (2016). Coopetition strategy as interrelated praxis and practices on multiple levels. Industrial Marketing Management, 58, 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.013.

9. Bouncken, R.B., Gast, J., Kraus, S., & Bogers, M. (2020). Coworking spaces: Empowerment for entrepreneurship and innovation in the digital and sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 114, 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.033.

10. Shvindina, H.O. (2019). Coopetition as an Emerging Trend in Research: Perspectives for Safety & Security. Safety Journal, 5(3), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety5030061.

11. Bounckena, R.B., Clau, Th., & Fredrich, V. (2016). Product innovation through coopetition in alliances: Singular or plural governance? Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.011.

12. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.

13. MinfinMedia LLC (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.minfin.com.ua/.

• < Prev
• Next >