Digitization as a means of implementing changes in the transitive model of power-property-labor relations in Ukraine

User Rating:  / 0
PoorBest 

Authors:


Yu.V.Honcharov, orcid.org/0000-0002-3800-8038, Academician Stepan Demianchuk International University of Economics and Humanities, Rivne, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

I.Yu.Shtuler, orcid.org/0000-0002-0852-8526, National Academy of Management, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O.A.Ovechkina, orcid.org/0000-0001-8259-6626, V. Dall East Ukrainian National University, Severodonetsk, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

M.V.Shtan, orcid.org/0000-0002-4938-555X, National Academy of Management, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


повний текст / full article



Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2021, (5): 170 - 175

https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-5/170



Abstract:



Purpose.
Substantiation of choice of the model of digitalization of domestic transitive economy and society, the implementation of which should prevent the development of negative consequences and strengthen the cumulative effect of positive factors.


Methodology.
Operationally, research was conducted based on the key provisions by economic theory and political economy, modern concepts of property, power and wage labor. Special research methods were used: grouping and systematization, logical generalization of major characteristics of the global digitalization of national economies. To achieve the purpose, general scientific methods of research on processes and phenomena were used, namely: methods of analysis and synthesis to create a methodological apparatus for studying the effects of digitalization on the social structure and economy of different countries. The application of the system-structural approach allowed developing and comparing models of digitalization of Ukrainian economy.


Findings.
Digitization is revealed in three aspects: process, result and factor of social and economic changes of the countries which are at different levels of development. Each of the aspects emphasizes the importance of digitalization in the transformations of economic sectors, significant changes in the economic, socio-cultural, institutional and legal systems of society. It is proved that digitalization exacerbates the issues of accelerated reindustrialization of industry on the basis of technological innovations, immediate solution of a complex of unemployment and employment problems, the emergence of new forms by non-economic exploitation. If ignoring the solution of the problems mentioned, a negative effect is inevitable: intellectual and technical backwardness, raw material orientation of the economy, critical disharmony of society, and others. The comparison of digitalization models showed that the implementation of the model of updating a range of industries can ensure the development of the digital sector and digital economy in Ukraine.


Originality.
The originality of the study is to find a model of digitalization that will be most conducive to progressive changes in the economy. One of such models is the model of complex renewal of industries under the conditions of Ukraines integration into the European digital market, which will ensure reindustrialization of production, stabilize the employment market, harmonize the social structure of society, and so on.


Practical value.
The results of the study can be used by government officials, scientists and business leaders in the process of adjusting the concept of digital economy and applying the proposed models of its implementation in accordance with the realities of the transitional state of all spheres of Ukrainian society.



Keywords:
transitive model of economy, digital employment, digitalization consequences, digitalization models

References.


1. Digitalizationis the revolution happening today. The Games for Business learning platform (n.d.). Retrieved from https://digital-transformation.gamesforbusiness.com/#solution.

2. Pugachevska, K.Y., & Pugachevska, K.S. (2018). Digitalization of the economy as a factor in increasing the countrys competitiveness. Market infrastructure, (25), 39-45.

3. Dobrova, T.G. (2017). Reproduction of industrial potential - a strategic task of economic policy of Ukraine. Strategic guidelines for the development of the economy of Ukraine: materials of the International scientific-practical conference, (pp. 24-27), Odessa, October 6-7, 2017. Retrieved from http://dspace.pdpu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/dspace. pdpu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/4594.

4. Posnova, T.V. (2019). Creative human capital as a factor of innovative economic development. Economic space, (141), 172-182.

5. Bilyk, O.I. (2019). The impact of the digital economy on reducing the negative effects of social risk. Problems of economics and management, (4), 8-16.

6. Matviychuk, L.O. (2018). Digital Economics: Theoretical Aspects. Bulletin of Zaporizhzhia National University. Economic sciences, 4(40), 116-127.

7. Geyts, V.M., & Gritsenko, A.A. (Eds.) (2019). Objective preconditions and imperatives of becoming a medium class in the context of overcoming the contradictions between efficiency and justice. Socio-class transformations and formation of a new quality of education as components of the reconstructive development of the economy of Ukraine: a monographic collection. Kyiv: NAS of Ukraine, SI Institute of Economics and predictions NAS of Ukraine, (pp. 6-25). Retrieved from http://ief.org.ua/docs/scc/11.pdf .

8. Pyshchulina, O. (2019). Two sides of digital technologies: digital dictatorship or preservation of stability. Retrieved from https://razumkov.org.ua/statti/dvi-storony-tsyfrovykh-tekhnologii-tsyfrova-dyktatura-abo-zberezhennia-stiikosti.

9. Sosnin, O. (2020). Digitalization as a new reality of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://lexinform.com.ua/dumka-ksperta/tsyfrovizatsiya-yak-nova-realnist-ukrayiny/.

10. Project Digital Agenda of Ukraine 2020 (Digital Agenda 2020) Conceptual framework (version 1.0) Priority areas, initiatives, projects of digitalization of Ukraine until 2020 (2020). Kyiv: Hi-tech office Ukraine. Retrieved from https://ucci.org.ua/uploads/files/58e78ee3c3922.pdf .

11. Audit of the economy of Ukraine 2030. Retrieved from https://nes2030.org.ua/docs/doc-audit.pdf.

12. Ukraine 2030E a country with a developed digital economy (n.d.). Retrieved from https://strategy.uifuture.org/kraina-z-rozvinutoyu-cifrovoyu-ekonomikoyu.html.

13. Papava, V.G. (2015). The necroeconomics of post-Soviet post-industrialism and the model of economic development of Georgia and Russia. Journal of Business and Economics, 6(5), 976-983.

14. Ukraines integration into the European Unions Digital Single Market: challenges, opportunities and barriers. December 3, 2019, Brussels. Report of the Ukrainian side of the EU-Ukraine Civil Society Platform (n.d.). Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MVXHW- v2q4BNoeg5Rkwsh3DzZQU6F_msyBRZEmbAYpw/edit.

15. Yavorskiy, P., Taran, S., Shepotylo, O., & Gamanyuk, O. (n.d.). Integration of Ukraine into the EU digital single market. Potential benefits. Consolidated report. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KDj_kQ7tkYnxtBP5jaxCzPr4PEadAYod/view.

 

Visitors

7575710
Today
This Month
All days
1937
98196
7575710

Guest Book

If you have questions, comments or suggestions, you can write them in our "Guest Book"

Registration data

ISSN (print) 2071-2227,
ISSN (online) 2223-2362.
Journal was registered by Ministry of Justice of Ukraine.
Registration number КВ No.17742-6592PR dated April 27, 2011.

Contacts

D.Yavornytskyi ave.,19, pavilion 3, room 24-а, Dnipro, 49005
Tel.: +38 (056) 746 32 79.
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
You are here: Home Archive by issue 2021 Content №5 2021 Digitization as a means of implementing changes in the transitive model of power-property-labor relations in Ukraine