Development of a morphological model for territorial development of underground city space
/ 0
- Details
- Category: Environmental Safety, Labour Protection
- Last Updated on 29 June 2019
- Published on 16 June 2019
- Hits: 3638
Authors:
H.I.Haiko, Dr. Sc. (Tech.), Prof., orcid.org/0000-0001-7471-3431, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
I.O.Savchenko, Cand. Sc. (Tech.), orcid.org/0000-0002-0921-5425, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
I.O.Matviichuk, orcid.org/0000-0002-3262-8762, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract:
Purpose. Development and testing of a model that formalizes and supports decision-making process regarding the appropriateness of using territory (geological environment) for urban underground construction.
Methodology. Modified morphological analysis of urbanized territories, expert evaluation method.
Findings. A morphological model and a tool set for evaluating construction sites for underground construction were tested; morphological tables were constructed; expert estimate scales for alternative values of construction site parameters were justified. Cross-consistency matrices of influence factors and parameter alternatives were evaluated. Evaluation of two sites for underground construction in Kyiv was performed using the developed model.
Originality. For the first time, a morphological model of territorial development for underground city planning was designed and tested on real construction sites in Kyiv. The modified morphological analysis method was applied for risk estimation of urban development of underground space. Systemic characteristics of urban territories were obtained, which show the favorability of a site for underground construction.
Practical value. Evaluation of the prospect of underground construction on the pre-project stage, capabilities for risk management of urban underground city space development, diminishing of the potential for project flaws caused by neglecting certain factors or specifics of a geological environment and technogenic impacts, convenient form of information generation as tables, charts or graphs.
References.
1. National Research Council of the National Academies (2013). Underground Engineering for Sustainable Urban Development. Washington: The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/14670.
2. Vähäaho, I. (2014). Underground space planning in Helsinki. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 6(5), 387-398. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.05.005.
3. Babets, D. V., Sdvyzhkova, О. О., Larionov, M. H., & Tereshchuk, R.M. (2017). Estimation of rock mass stability based on probability approach and rating systems. Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 2(158), 58-64.
4. Gayko, G. I., & Kril, T. V. (2015). Typization of geological environment of urbanized territories when developing underground space. In ХІV international scientific-practical conference “Modern information technologies of managing ecological safety, natural resource usage, emergency measures” (pp. 173-180), Kyiv. Retrieved from http://journals.uran.ua/geoeco/article/download/39-51/133440.
5. Zgurovsky, M. Z., & Pankratova, N. D. (2015). System analysis: problems, methodology, applications (2nd ed.). Kyiv: Naukova dumka.
6. Gorelova, G. V., & Pankratova, N. D. (Eds). (2015). Innovative development of socioeconomic systems based on foresight and cognitive modeling methodologies. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.
7. Pankratova, N. D., & Malafeeva, L. Yu. (2014). Knowledge information model of the scenario analysis. Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, 46(2), 56-66. DOI: 10.1615/JAutomatInfScien.v46.i2.50.
8. Tsyganok, V., Kadenko, S., Andriychuk, O., & Roik, P. (2017). Usage of multicriteria decision-making support arsenal for strategic planning in environmental protection sphere. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 24(5-6), 227-238. DOI: 10.1002/mcda.1616.
9. Pankratova, N. D., & Nedashkovskaya, N. I. (2014). Hybrid Method of Multicriteria Evaluation of Decision Alternatives. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 50(5), 701-711. DOI: 10.1007/s10559-014-9660-2.
10. Nedashkovskaya, N. I. (2015). Method for evaluation of the uncertainty of the paired comparisons expert judgements when calculating the decision alternatives weights. Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, 47(10), 69-82. DOI: 10.1615/JAutomatInfScien.v47.i10.70.
11. Resin, V. I., & Popkov, Yu. S. (2013). Development of large cities under conditions of transitional economy. System approach. Moscow: Bookhouse “LIBROKOM”.
12. Kartosiya, B. A. (2015). Developing underground space of large cities. New tendencies. Mining information-analytical bulletin (scientific technical journal), 1, 615-629.
13. Pankratova, N., Gayko, G., Kravets, V., & Savchenko, I. (2016). Problems of Megapolises Underground Space System Planning. Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, 48(4), 32-38. DOI: 10.1615/JAutomatInfScien.v48.i4.40.
14. Pankratova, N. D., Savchenko, I. O., Gayko, G. I., & Kravets, V. G. (2018). Evaluating Perspectives of Urban Underground Construction Using Modified Morphological Analysis Method. Problems of Control and Informatics, 5, 91-102.
15. Ritchey, T. (n.d.). Futures Studies using Morphological Analysis. Adapted from an Article for the UN University Millennium Project: Futures Research Methodology Series, Version 3.0 Retrieved from http://swemorph.com/pdf/futures.pdf.
Archive