Features of master’s degree programs in Ukraine: formation of administrative competencies
/ 1
- Details
- Category: Economy and Management
- Last Updated on 20 March 2019
- Published on 04 March 2019
- Hits: 2540
Authors:
O.Novak, Cand. Sc. (Pedag.), orcid.org/0000-0003-3187-1872, Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University, Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
L.Levchenko, Cand. Sc. (Philos.), Assoc. Prof., orcid.org/0000-0002-9919-9018, Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University, Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
I.Levchenko, Dr. Sc. (Histor.), Assoc. Prof., orcid.org/0000-0001-9652-8755, Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University, Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
O.Kostenko, Cand. Sc. (Histor.), Assoc. Prof., orcid.org/0000-0003-0831-9158, Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University, Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract:
Purpose. To examine the relevance of master’s programs in higher education institutions of the USA, the European Union and Ukraine. Taking the example of administrative competencies formation in the Master of Education programs, to compare the relevance of majors and competencies for the Master of Education degree in the USA, Europe and Ukraine. Based on the results achieved, to recommend the sequence of modernization of master’s programs in Ukraine in accordance with the standards of the European Higher Education Area.
Methodology. The authors used the comparative analysis method, which made it possible to compare the features of administrative competencies formation in master’s programs in the United States, the European Union and Ukraine. The logical method of scientific knowledge allowed the authors to draw conclusions that justify the need for further modernization of master’s programs in Ukraine in accordance with standards of the European Higher Education Area.
Findings. The authors have examined comparison of meanings, which are embedded in the phrase “administrative competences” in Ukraine, the USA and states of the European Union. The authors have concluded that in the Ukrainian educational system understanding of administrative competencies and need for their formation in university graduates differs little from their understanding in the USA and the European Higher Education Area. In examining master’s degree programs in the USA and the State of the European Union, the authors have found that education is differentiated not only between states, as well as within states. The authors have concluded that modernization of the Ukrainian educational system in accordance with the standards of the European Higher Education Area does not threaten Ukrainian identity, and, instead, develops it. By comparing administrative competencies formation in the Master of Education programs in higher education institutions of the USA, Europe and Ukraine, the authors have found significant differences between these programs. The authors have developed recommendations for modernization of the Master of Education programs in accordance with the standards of the European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.
Originality. The authors have proved the irrelevance of majors and competencies for the Master of Education degree in Ukraine in comparison with the USA and the States of the European Union. Taking the example of administrative competencies formation in the Master of Education programs in the higher education institutions of the USA, Europe and Ukraine, the authors have found that 1) in Ukraine master’s programs are not divided into “research” and “professional”, as is adopted in the USA and the states of the European Union; 2) the Master of Education programs in Ukraine provide mastering of majors which do not correspond to the classification adopted in the European Higher Education Area. The authors have recommended modernizing the Master of Education program in Ukraine in accordance with the standards of the European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Namely: 1) to divide master’s programs into research and professional; 2) to standardize the Master of Education programs, and retain the following majors: curriculum and instruction; counseling; school psychology; administration.
Practical value. The research ensures consistency of modernization of master’s programs in Ukraine in accordance with the standards of the European Higher Education Area. The results of the research can be used for administrative competencies formation in the Master of Education programs in accordance with the standards of the European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.
References.
1. Feeney, S. and Hogan, J., 2017. A Path Dependence Approach to Understanding Educational Policy Harmonisation: The Qualifications Framework in The European Higher Education Area. High Educ Policy, 30, pp. 279–298. DOI: 10.1057/s41307-016-0019-3.
2. Aleksandrova, N., 2016. Cross-Cultural Competence of Specialists Engaged in International Business, Economic Relationships and Management: Content and Structure (With a view to business challenges). Future Human Image [pdf], 3(6), pp. 1–15. Available at: <http://www.fhijournal.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2016/09/3-6-2016-01-Aleksandrova.pdf> [Accessed 23 September 2017].
3. Dodonova, V., 2014. The Postnonclassical Horizons of Social Management. Philosophy and Cosmology, 13, pp. 233‒244.
4. Gaievska, O., 2015. Generally Civilized Context of Governing the Social Organization of the World. Philosophy and Cosmology, 15, pp. 182‒197.
5. Kyrychok, A., 2017. The Main Determinants of Improvement of Model of Educational Training of Specialists in the Field of PR Based on Competency Approach. Future Human Image, 7, pp. 71‒85.
6. Ryabovol, L., 2017. The Professional Training of Law and History Teachers as a Research Subject. Future Human Image, 8, pp. 140‒148.
7. Ursul, A. and Ursul, T., 2018. Environmental Education for Sustainable Development. Future Human Image, 9, pp. 115‒125. DOI: 10.29202/fhi/9/12.
8. Svyrydenko, D. and Yatsenko, O., 2018. Dialectics of Nominal and Real Power in the Ukrainian and World Politics. Ukrainian Policymaker, 2, pp. 33‒40. DOI: 10.29202/up/2/5.
9. Bazaluk, O., Svyrydenko, D. and Terepyshchyi, S., 2017. Structural-Functional Models of Integration and Reintegration of Ukrainian Educational Landscape. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 5, pp. 163‒168.
10. Naumenko, R., 2018. Philosophy of Public Governance: Manpower Policy of Modern Ukraine in the Context of Globalization. Philosophy and Cosmology, 20, pp. 106‒112. DOI: 10.29202/phil-cosm/20/9.
11. Bazaluk, O., 2017. Plato’s and Isocrates’ Traditions in the Development of Educational Theories in the History of Culture. Annals of the University of Craiova – Philosophy Series, 40(2), pp. 5‒18.
12. Kieliszek, Z., 2018. National Identity as an Important Topic of the Research of the Man in the Future: “Opening” the Potential of the Fichtean Concept of National Identity. Philosophy and Cosmology, 20, pp. 83‒91. DOI: 10.29202/phil-cosm/20/7.
13. Lavrysh, Y., 2018. Implementation of Transformative Sustainability Learning into Engineering Curricular. Future Human Image, 9, pp. 63‒73. DOI: 10.29202/fhi/9/6.
14. Rudenko, S., Sapenko, R., Bazaluk, O. and Tytarenko, V., 2018. Management Features of International Educational Projects Between Universities of Poland and Ukraine. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 2, pp. 142‒147. DOI: 10.29202/nvngu/2018-2/21.
15. Bazaluk, O., 2017. The Theory of War and Peace, Geophilosophy of Europe. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
16. Bazaluk, O., 2018. The Feature Transformations of the Basic Meanings of Greek Paideia in the Educational Theories in the Middle Ages. Schole, 12.1, pp. 243‒258. DOI: 10.21267/AQUILO.2018.12.10428.
17. Pavlova, O., 2018. Politically-Technological Potential of Cultural Practices in Ukrainian Perspective. Ukrainian Policymaker, 2, pp. 20‒26. DOI: 10.29202/up/2/3.
18. The U.S. Department of Education, 2018. Laws & Guidance. Overview [online]. Available at: <https://www2.ed.gov/policy/landing.jhtml?src=pn> [Accessed 11 July 2018].
19. Carnegie Mellon University, 2018. Masters of Educational Technology and Applied Learning Science (METALS) [online]. Available at: <https://metals.hcii.cmu.edu/> [Accessed 14 July 2018].
20. Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University, 2018. Supplementary to Protocol No. 3 of meeting of the competition committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine [online]. Available at: <https://drive.google.com/file/d/ 10WSkYTI2LDDXFx97Tlk9OEO0oUJkziRl/view> [Accessed 20 September 2018].
Archive