Petrographic research on stone tools from the megalithic cult site of Tokivske-1

User Rating:  / 0
PoorBest 

Authors:

I. S. Nikitenko, Cand. Sc. (Geol.), Assoc. Prof., orcid.org/0000-0003-4207-2427, National Mining University, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

O. V. Starik, Cand. Sc. (History), Dnipropetrovsk National Historical Museum named after D. I. Yavornytskyi, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

M. L. Kutsevol, Cand. Sc. (Geol.), Assoc. Prof., orcid.org/0000-0001-8718-2748, National Mining University, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

S. V. Shevchenko, Cand. Sc. (Geol.), Assoc. Prof., orcid.org/0000-0003-3994-1927, National Mining University, Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract:

Purpose. Determination of the stone raw materials resource base used by the populations of various historical epochs, who left their monuments in the territory of the stationary megalithic cult site in the village of Tokivske, Apostolove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Ukraine.

Methodology. The research was performed using the method of comparative petrographic analysis of stone artefacts and rocks from natural exposures in thin sections.

Findings. Twelve artefacts were analyzed: eight of the Bronze Age, one of the Early Iron Age (Scythian Culture) and one of the 17th–18th centuries, as well as two undated artefacts. As a result of petrographic analysis, they were divided into groups according to the stone materials from which they were produced: granites, metabasites, quartzites and quartz, schists, metasandstones and sandstones. Among the Bronze Age artefacts seven have local provenance from the village of Tokivske and the neighboring village of Sholokhove where a stone-processing workshop might have existed. The one imported tool is an amphibolite grinder, most likely brought from the middle section of the river Bazavluk. Concerning stone items of other epochs, a metasandstone plummet, dated to the 17th–18th centuries, apparently originated from Kryvyi Rih. The provenances of the remaining artefacts are somewhat ambiguous.

Originality. For the first time the archaeological finds from the megalithic stationary cult site Tokivske-1 were studied using mineralogical and petrographic analysis, and the probable sites of the stone mining for their production were determined.

Practical value. The obtained data indicates sites where ancient stone-processing workshops existed, being useful information for archaeological exploration. Also, the gathered information can be used for writing general works on archaeology and the history of mining.

References.

1. Starik, O. and Proshnychenko, M., 2013. Archaeological exploration in the village Tokivske, Apostolove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. Archaeology & Fortification of the Middle Dniester area. Collected materials of the 3rd All-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference. Kamianets-Podilskyi, pp. 56–60 [online]. Available at: <http://muzeum.in.ua/files/%D0%97%D0% B1%D1%96%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA_2013.pdf > [Accessed 28 January 2017].

2. Burton, M. M., Muniz, A. A., Abbott, P. L., Kimbrough, D. L., Haproff, P. J., Gehrels, G. E. and Pecha, M., 2014. Sourcing sandstone cobble grinding tools in southern California using petrography, U-Pb geochronology, and Hf isotope geochemistry. Journal of Archaeological Science, 50, pp. 273–287.

3. Giustetto, R., Perrone, U. and Compagnoni, R., 2016. Neolithic polished greenstone industry from Castello di Annone (Italy): minero-petrographic study and archaeometric implications. European Journal of Mineralogy, 28, pp. 889–905. 

4. Miletić, S., Kramar, S., Lux, J., Šmuc, A. and Zupančič, N., 2016. Provenance analysis of Roman stone artefacts from sedimentary rocks from the archaeological site near Mošnje, NW Slovenia. Geologija, 59/1, pp. 35–54.

5. Nikitenko, I. S. and Lysenko, S. D., 2014. Results of the mineralogical and petrographic analysis of stone goods from the burial ground Malopolovetskoye-3 and the settlement Malopolovetskoye-2A (Kiev Region). Stratum Plus, 2, pp. 333–345.

6. Nikitenko, I. S. and Kutsevol, M. L., 2016. On raw materials of Neolithic stone hoes from the Dnieper rapids area. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 4, pp. 5–12.

7. Dorofeev, V. N., Brovender, Yu. M., Gajko, G. I., 2003. Ancient mines in Seversky Donets Basin. Gornyi Zhurnal, 11, pp. 72–73. Available at: http://www.rudmet.ru/journal/1086/article/17857/ [Accessed 28 April 2017].

8. Ponomarenko, O., Kurylo, S. and Kovalenko, O., 2014. Main morphological types of zircon crystals from two-feldspar granitoids of Middle-Dnieper megablock of the Ukrainian Shield. Mineralogical Review, 1(64), pp. 80–89.

9. Stepaniuk, L. M., Kurylo, S. I. and Kotvitska, I. M., 2016. Possible sources of original magmas of two-feldspar granites and conditions of magma generation (on the example of the Middle Dnieper megablock of USh). Mineralogical Journal, 3(38), pp. 81–91.

10. Sukach, V., Kurylo, S. and Grinchenko, O., 2016. Tonalite-throndemite-granodiorite (TTG) associations of the Middle Dnieper Archean craton. Visnyk Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geology, 1(72), pp. 20–27.

11. Sukach, V. V., 2015. Petrogenesis of Auly series amphibolites in Bazavluchok river basin, Middle Dnipro megablock of the Ukrainian Shield. Mineralogical Journal, 1(37), pp. 69–85.

12. Kostenko, M. M., 2016. Geotectonic zoning of Ukrainian Shield as the basis of tectonic, stratigraphic and of other constructions. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats UkrDHRI, 3, pp. 144–163.

13. Klochko, L. S., 2016. Anklets in suits of Scythia population (in the Forest-Steppe Left Bank Dnipro region). Pratsi Tsentru pamiatkoznavstva,29, pp. 94–101.

14. Paranko, I. S. and Matischuk, O. A., 2014. On the issue of stratification of Skelevatka suite of Kryvyi Rih series. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats UkrDHRI, 1, pp. 140–149.

15. Romashko, O. V., 2016. Archaeological essay. In: N. H. Pershina, ed., 2016. Monuments of History and Culture of Apostolovskyi Raion. Dnipro: Zhurfond, pp. 6–40.

 повний текст / full article



Tags: ancient miningstone materialsstone toolsBronze AgeScythian cultureCossacksTokivske