Науковий вісник НГУ

Representation of enterprise capital assets usage efficiency in the balanced scorecard

User Rating:  / 0

Details

Category: Economy

Last Updated on Wednesday, 19 March 2014 20:44

Published on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 20:14

Hits: 3452

Authors:

S.B. Dovbnia, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, National Metallurgical Academy of Ukraine, Head of the Department of Economy of Industry, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine

Abstract:

Purpose. To improve the structure of balanced scorecard taking into account features and problems of domestic industrial enterprises and to substantiate the index set that represents the condition and usage efficiency of capital assets.

Originality. We have developed the concept of the balance and improved the balanced scorecard and the methods of its formation. It has been determined that balance of the system is achieved by reaching the balance in the following fields: between the factors of internal environment and those of external environment; between lag indicators and lead indicators; between indices characterizing different aspects of enterprise activity, including: production, marketing, usage of primary resources, personnel, management system and others; between indices of different hierarchy levels of an enterprise; between financial and nonfinancial indices. The analysis of the traditional structure of balanced scorecard and its indices shows the lack of indicators representing the usage efficiency of capital assets.

Findings. As a result of the research the improved methods of balanced scorecard formation have been developed. These methods suppose to introduce the component of “Operating Activities” which consists of the following units: “Raw Materials”, “Capital Assets”, “Management of Operating Processes”. The composition of indices for every additional block has been substantiated.

Practical value. The improved structure of balanced scorecard is of practical value as it precisely reflects the specificity of industrial enterprises and allows us to evaluate the condition of capital assets promptly and correctly, to determine the efficiency of their usage, to analyze actions on capital assets renewals and also to provide efficient resources allocation corresponding to the strategy of the enterprise. The usage of the given system at industrial enterprises will allow providing validity of strategy formation and will increase the efficiency of its fulfillment.

References:

1.     Каплан Роберт С. Сбалансированная система показателей. От стратегии к действию / Роберт С. Каплан, Дейл П. Нортон // Пер. с англ. – М.: ЗАО „Олимп – Бизнес“, 2003. – 304с.

Robert S. Kaplan and Dale P. Norton (1996), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business Press Books.

2.     Энди Нили. Призма эффективности. Карта сбалансированных показателей для измерения успеха в бизнесе и управления им / Нили Энди, Адамс Крис, Кеннерли Майк // Пер. с англ. – Днепропетровск: Баланс-Клуб, 2003. – 398с.

Neely, A., Adams, C. and Kennerley, M.(2002), The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success, Financial Times Prentice Hall.

3.     Нивен Пол Р. Сбалансированная система показателей – шаг за шагом: Максимальное повышение эффективности и закрепление полученных результатов / Пол Р. Нивен // Пер. с англ. – Днепропетровск: Баланс-Клуб, 2003. – 328с.

Paul R. Niven(2006), Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results, Wiley; 2 edition.

4.     Фелпс Боб. Умные показатели: Система измерений эффективности как важный элемент менеджмента / Боб Фелпс // Пер. с англ. – Днепропетровск: Баланс-Клуб, 2003. – 312с.

Phelps, B. (2003), Smart Business Metrics: Measure What Really Counts and Manage What Makes the Difference (Financial Times Series), Financial Times / Prentice Hall; 1 edition.

5.     Недосекин А. Система Сбалансированных Показателей: плюсы, минусы, проблемы внедрения / Недосекин А. // Менеджмент & Менеджер– 2003. – №4. – С. 86–93.

Nedosekin,A. (2003), “The balanced scorecard: pluses, minuses, problems of introduction”,Management & Manager,no.4, pp. 86–93.

6.     Хорват Петер. ССП как средство управления предприятием / Хорват Петер // Проблемы теории и практики управления– 2004. – №1. – С. 45–52.

Horvat,P. (2004), “SSP as means by a management by an enterprise”,Problems of Theory and Practice of Management, no.1, pp. 45–52.

7.     Аронова Л. Р. Сбалансированная система показателей:мировые стандарты и российский опыт / Аронова Л. Р. // Менеджмент & Менеджер– 2006. – №7. – С. 106–113.

Aronova,L.P. (2006), “The Balanced Scorecardworld standards and Russian experience”,Management & Manager,no.7, pp. 106–113.

01_2013_dovbnia
2014-03-19  436.12 KB  2089

• < Prev
• Next >